A Buckeye at Pea Ridge

Over the past 18 years, I have read through thousands of issues of Ohio's Civil War era newspapers searching out soldiers' correspondence, but recently I came across an unusual account that I thought would merit a blog post. In the first year of the war, most of Ohio's soldiers served either in the Shenandoah Valley or in Kentucky and Tennessee, but a few served in the far west, some serving in units from out of state. This extraordinary letter is from one of those few: Sergeant Moses T. Anderson of Holmes County, who was serving in Company B of the 59th Illinois Infantry. Letters from soldiers serving from out of state are not unusual, but battle accounts from engagements fought west of the Mississippi River have proven few and far between, at least in Ohio's newspapers, and that's what makes Anderson's letter special.

Anderson's letter, published in the April 10, 1862 issue of the Holmes County Farmer, recounts his regiment's experience at the important Battle of Pea Ridge, Arkansas which was fought March 7-8, 1862. The 59th Illinois, originally known as the 9th Missouri, fought as part of Colonel Julius White's Second Brigade composed of just two regiments and an artillery battery: the 37th Illinois, 59th Illinois, and Battery B, 2nd Illinois Light Artillery under Captain Peter Davidson. White's brigade formed a part of Brigadier General Jefferson C. Davis' division- Davis had already gained some notoriety for being part of the Fort Sumter garrison that took part in the war's opening moments in April 1861. But it was on the field of Pea Ridge, that Davis cemented his reputation for hard fighting with his conduct of the engagement on the first day of the battle at Leetown.

Kurz & Allison print depicting the Battle of Pea Ridge


Camp Halleck, Benton Co., Arkansas

March 22, 1862

                The telegraph has informed you long ere this of the great battle that has recently been fought in this vicinity. I propose to give you a few particulars of that hard contested and memorable engagement and the part a “humble soger boy” of gallant “little Holmes” here in said contest. From the time our gallant boys first trod the sacred soil of this state (February 17th) to the 5th inst., nothing worthy of note occurred to disturb the usual quietness of camp life. That evening we retired, everything as quiet as usual. About midnight we were awakened and ordered to cook three days’ rations as the enemy was advancing upon us with a very large force. As we had frequently been before, as we thought, just on the eve of a battle and were deceived, we naturally supposed that this would also prove a delusion, but notwithstanding this, obeyed the order strictly. During the night a part of General Curtis’ division returned (we were then camped on Little Sugar Creek) from Cross Hollows, where they had been encamped about ten miles south of us. They had to leave in such haste that they were compelled to destroy part of their tents, provisions, etc. to prevent them from falling into the hands of the enemy.

Major General Franz Sigel
General Sigel’s division was left near Bentonville to offer them fight, and if possible, to draw them on to attack the main force. To accomplish the latter they had an easy task, as it seems they had not only previously determined to attack us, but were perfectly confident of an easy victory.  General Sigel fought against fearful odds that day. At times, they had him surrounded and whole companies of his men taken prisoners. Thus the battle raged most of the day. In the evening, he retreated to the main body. That day and night large details of men from each company were being engaged in felling trees, and building fortifications on the hillside to the north of Sugar Creek.

The second day (March 7), cannonading commenced about 10 o’clock to the northeast of us distant two or three miles. It kept advancing and was soon heard north and northwest of us. It was then evident that they had us surrounded, but the beauty of it was that we whipped them after they had obtained their desired advantage. Our division (General Davis’) took position behind our fortifications. We did not remain there long, as it was evident they were not going to attack us there. We then moved in a northwesterly direction. As we passed along we could hear them fighting off to our right.
Map of the battle near Leestown- the 59th Illinois fought in the woods to the right of the Federal batteries on this map.

At Leetown, a small village about a half mile south of our battleground where our hospitals were, we threw off our knapsacks and pushed on at the double quick. We passed our battery (Captain Davidson’s Illinois Battery) on our left in the northeast corner of a cornfield. We marched on west a few rods further and then filed right into the woods where the brush was so thick we could scarcely make our way through it. We marched in that direction a short distance and then formed a line of battle facing to the west.
Brigadier General Jefferson C. Davis' fine combat record during
the Civil War is marred by his murderous altercation with
General William Nelson in Louisville in September 1862.

We immediately advanced upon the enemy. We had not proceeded many steps when the butternuts (that is what the boys call the enemy, as they are all dressed in clothes colored with the walnut) were seen in the brush. Immediately a desperate volley was sent into the Rebel ranks and nobly did we continue the same advancing upon them, and they returning the same upon us. Thus the battle raged with great destruction and fury for some time, causing immense slaughter (as we have since learned) on their side and considerable on ours. Our officers, seeing that we could gain some advantage by falling back a few rods, ordered us to do so which we did, and advanced upon them again. After fighting with great gallantry for some time, we again fell back and rallied a third time, and continued to let fly our messengers of death at them for some time and then retired again. (This is an account of what our regiment the 59th Illinois did.) This was a desperate engagement. The air seemed literally filled with leaden hail. The bullets flew around us, cutting of the branches of bushes, whizzing by our ears and cutting or clothes. It reminded me of a hailstorm. My only astonishment is that so many escaped. The loss of our regiment is as follows: Major Philip S. Post, Second Lieutenant James A. Beach (Co. I), and Sergeant Major John Ford Smith wounded. The entire loss is 11 killed and 53 wounded. Our company had one killed, one mortally wounded, two severely and one slightly wounded. The second mentioned stood in front of me and as we retired I assisted him off the battlefield. He has since died.
Colonel Julius White would garner a promotion to brigadier
for his role at Pea Ridge and would transfer east, where he gained
 a court martial for his role in the surrender of Harper's Ferry.
Acquitted of any wrong doing, he served as a divisional commander with
Burnside's 9th Corps in Knoxville and at Petersburg.

The Indiana brigade took position in rear of our battery, concealed from the enemy by the timber. They thinking the battery unprotected, charged upon it and took it, planting their contemptible rag of a flag upon it and gave three hearty cheers over their seeming victory. Their joy was of short duration, for just as they were ready to haul away their rich prize, the gallant Hoosiers poured a deadly fire into their ranks, causing many of their men to bite the dust and the rest to retreat in great dismay and confusion, closely pursued by the brave Hoosiers “remembering Buena  Vista.” Thus they were routed. We searched in vain for them, but they had fled and were perfectly satisfied with Suckers and Hoosiers.

General Davis says our division composed of five regiments greatly cut down by disease, discharges, etc., fought against 10,000 of their “picked men” being Ben McCulloch’s crack regiments from Mississippi, Louisiana, Texas, Arkansas, and Indians, and that we killed the proud, chivalric, and ubiquitous Ben McCulloch, McIntosh (leader of the Indians), and a General Reeves. This opinion is corroborated by Rebel officers we have captured. They also admit that General Slack was killed and Generals Price and Reines wounded. As a matter of fact, we know nothing certain about these reports, but as it is the admissions of their officers and from other evidence we believe them to be true.

General Curtis’ division was on the right, ours in the center, and General Sigel’s on the left. The third day our brigade was in the battlefield before sunrise and took position along a cornfield fence in a meadow. Our battery was in our rear and to our right. They opened upon the enemy and continued firing for some time without receiving a reply. Presently the enemy opened fire and paid them a few visits in the shapes of balls and shells, then forsook them and paid the remainder of their compliments (if such they might be called) to us. At first they shot far beyond us, but kept getting closer until finally their balls came ploughing up the ground just a few feet in the rear of us, and came near killed our brigadier and colonel (White and Fredericks). In fact, the latter (Lieutenant Colonel Calvin H. Fredericks) was so stunned by a ball that he had to be taken off the field. Our officers perceiving the imminent danger and that we were powerless in that situation, ordered us to retreat across the meadow and form a line in the edge of the woods along the meadow fence. While making that memorable retreat, the enemy was firing upon us with two or three batteries but it seems a miracle that none were hurt.

In the meantime, our battery had changed its position and was now planted on our right. For a time it had to contend with a number of the enemy’s batteries. After our other batteries came to her assistance, I presume such desperate cannonading is seldom seen in a field fight. It was kept up about 1 1/2 hours. I presume it got to be too hot work for the enemy as they stopped. When in our second position the enemy was firing over us all the time. I suppose no proof is needed to convince the reader that I have heard more melodious sounds than the sharp whistling sound of the bullet and deep growling sound of the cannon ball and that I should prefer lounging on a sofa to that of lying in such close proximity to where cannon balls alight.

We had one more skirmish that morning which ended one of the greatest, if not the greatest, battles ever fought west of the Mississippi. Their loss in killed and wounded in upwards of 3,000, ours is about 1,000. We have taken from 500-1,000 prisoners and from 1,000-2,000 stand of arms. Considering that they outnumbered us two to one and that they had us surrounded and then we had to fight them on ground of their choosing (as we had to make the attack) and in their favorite method (bushwhacking), and also considering the relative losses in both men and officers, it is truly a great victory. But as my letter is already too long, I shall close for the present.


www.columbianarsenal.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Most Popular Posts

Arming the Buckeyes: Longarms of the Ohio Infantry Regiments

Image
     A common question that comes up in conversation about Civil War Buckeye regiments is "What were they armed with?" We are fortunate in that the state of Ohio kept good records of how the regiments were armed when they went into service, this being especially true for those regiments which went into service in 1861 and 1862. The state adjutant general's reports for 1861 and 1862 have been heavily drawn upon to construct this article, as well as consultation with Phil Spaugy who has done extensive research on how Ohio's troops were armed during the war.      Buckeyes carried a fairly wide variety of weapons into the field, and the below article breaks this down into weapons of both domestic manufacture and imported arms. The early days of the war found the state of Ohio practically bereft of longarms; as an example, when the 1st and 2nd Ohio Volunteer Militia left the state in late April 1861, they left unarmed, being armed at Lancaster, Pennsylvania on t...
Read more

Bullets for the Union: Manufacturing Small Arms Ammunition During the Civil War

Image
       Civil War bullets are perhaps the most common item collected from the era; the two armies expended bullets by the millions during the four years’ conflict and spent or deformed bullets of all shapes and sizes have made fascinating and affordable collectibles since the guns went silent in 1865.       I recently acquired a display piece featuring 35 different types of small arms ammunition used during the Civil War, including everything from a small .28 caliber ball up to a .69 caliber three-ring Minie and it triggered some questions: how did the Federal army obtain its small arms ammunition during the war? Where did the lead come from to make the bullets, and where and how was the ammunition manufactured? This post seeks to answer those questions. A typical .58 caliber 3-ring Minie bullet   “Whenever the blasts of war blow in the ears of men who trade in the implements of destruction, they are apt to experience more joy than the true ...
Read more

Dressing the Rebels: How to Dye Butternut Jeans Cloth

Image
     In the early days of the Civil War,  the Southern states found themselves with an abundance of cotton but a shortage of cloth with which to make army uniforms. The trade in cloth prior to the war had largely been to send raw cotton or wool north to New England (or Great Britain) where it was converted into usable cloth; but now that trade was broken and the Southern states were thrown upon their own resources in their efforts to properly clothe the Confederate army.  This collection of Confederate enlisted men's frock coats and shell jackets gives some indication of the variety of shades of butternut worn during the war. All of them are shades of yellow brown, some heavier on the yellow and some heavier on the brown. The blue used around the collar or as rank insignia indicates that the soldier was in the infantry. Surviving Confederate uniforms are considered rather rare and command quite a healthy price in the collecting market. For an in-depth study of h...
Read more

The Wizard of Oz and the Civil War

Image
T he 1939 film The Wizard of Oz has delighted viewers for 85 years and ranks as a personal favorite, especially during the Halloween season. While watching it with the family the other night, I wondered if there were any connections between the film and the Civil War. Not surprisingly, the answer is yes and those connections touch both the blue and the gray.           Interestingly both “witches” in the film not only had Civil War ancestors but had connections with Civil War soldiers from Ohio. Margaret Hamilton, the “Wicked Witch of the West,” was born in Cleveland, Ohio on December 9, 1902, to attorney Walter Jones Hamilton and his wife Mary Jane Adams; Margaret’s grandfather was Judge Edwin Timothy Hamilton. Judge Hamilton had served as a private in Co. D of the 84 th Ohio Infantry during the summer of 1862. The 84 th Ohio, a three months’ regiment, served nearly the whole of its service attached to the Railroad District in western Ma...
Read more

The Vaunted Enfield Rifle Musket

Image
     The English-made Model 1853 .577 caliber Enfield Rifle Musket was widely regarded as the best infantry arm in the world at the outbreak of the Civil War in April 1861. Favorable international press describing its efficiency in the Crimean War and in suppressing the Indian rebellion led to the widespread desire of American infantrymen (both Federal and Confederate) to be armed with these accurate and well-made arms. The lock plate of this well-worn P1853 Enfield rifle musket produced in 1862 shows the typical markings of a British-made weapon that made it through the Federal blockade.  ( Army of Tennessee Relics ) Enfield-pattern weapons were imported into the states by the tens and hundreds of thousands during the war years; one estimate stated that the Federal government purchased 500,000 while the Confederates purchased another 400,000. The Confederate government dispatched Captain Caleb Huse to Europe in April 1861 to purchase weapons and Huse focused on se...
Read more

In front of Atlanta with the 68th Ohio

Image
  The arrow corps badge of the 17th Army Corps was worn by many members of the 68th Ohio in the latter days of the war.       Private Edward A. Bigelow of Co. F of the 68th Ohio Volunteer Infantry wrote this brief account of the Battle of Atlanta just two days afterwards to his father back home in Henry County, Ohio. The regiment formed a part of Colonel Robert K. Scott's three regiment all-Ohio brigade consisting of the 20th, 68th, and 78th regiments, being designated the Second Brigade of the Third Division of Frank Blair's 17th Army Corps. Bigelow's letter originally appeared in the Napoleon Press newspaper and was copied in the Toledo Daily Commercial which was providential as no known copies exist today of the wartime Napoleon Press.  
Read more

Charging Battery Robinett: An Alabama Soldier Recalls the Vicious Fighting at Corinth

Image
W riting 30 years after the Battle of Corinth, James A. McKinstry of the 42 nd Alabama recalled his experiences storming Battery Robinett with Colonel William P. Rogers of the 2 nd Texas and expressed guilt that it was perhaps his action that brought about the colonel’s demise. “On seeing a line of Federals approaching, and before giving the situation a thought, I immediately raised my gun and fired full into the breast of a Federal sergeant, who was in front of the column, and only a short distance from us.  'Twas then that Captain George Foster shouted, "Cease firing, men! cease firing!" and waved his handkerchief, then I realized the true situation. 'Twas too late! That fatal volley had been turned on our little band from the muzzles of 1,500 muskets. I was still standing just as I was when I fired my last shot, and within a few feet of Colonel Rogers, when a Minie ball went crashing through my left hip and turned me half round; another went tearing through my ...
Read more

Cook & Brother of New Orleans

Image
    The lockplate of a New Orleans-made Cook & Brother Enfield rifle produced in 1862 shows the fine craftsmanship that became the hallmark of the maker throughout the Civil War. Note the stars and bars flag at left, an emblem used on C&B's production throughout the war and the Cook & Brother, N.O. 1862 markings. Earlier production weapons at New Orleans had the flag located just above the maker's name while later weapons produced in Athens, Georgia would have a modified flag and Athens on the plate followed by the serial number.        In the spring of 1861, two English-born businessmen, Ferdinand and Francis Cook of New Orleans, perceived the need for the South to have its own domestic production of firearms and  set out to prove "that rifles could made here as well as in Yankee land or in Europe." The brothers  elected to produce copies of the British Model 1853 .577 caliber Enfield rifle as this was considered the benchmark longarm...
Read more

I Want to See a Battle: A Hoosier at Shiloh

Image
W riting in his diary, Private Manius Buchanan of the 29 th Indiana recalled the eagerness with which his regiment marched towards Savannah, Tennessee with the sounds of the battle of Shiloh ringing in their ears.           “The forced march was kept up until 2 p.m. when we were halted until 4 p.m,” he noted. “The rest was really needed, but the continual question is ‘Why are we stopped here?’ The sound of battle increased in volume and anxiety to be up and doing grows more intense. As I am weak from a late sickness, I am urged to fall to the rear; but no, in common with all, I want to see a battle and fear this will be my only chance.” The regiment would go into action the following afternoon, and of the four neighborhood boys who had enlisted together in Co. B, only Buchanan escaped unscathed. One afternoon's exposure to the horrors of battle was all it took to satisfy this Hoosier's desire to see the elephant. “I wanted to see a battl...
Read more

An Interview with Forrest in May 1864

Image
  “The noise of battle is the only music that ravishes the senses of Forrest.” I t was May 1864. Back east, the Army of Northern Virginia and the Army of the Potomac were locked in the deadly dance of the Overland Campaign while in Georgia, General William Tecumseh Sherman's army squared off against General Joseph E. Johnston and the Army of the Tennessee in the campaign for Atlanta.       Based in relatively quiet northern Mississippi, General Nathan Bedford Forrest bided his time waiting for a Federal advance from Memphis. Earlier in the month, General Samuel Sturgis led a brief campaign into Mississippi but Forrest was sure Sturgis would venture out again. In the meantime, he tried to keep his reorganized command intact despite persistent demands from his superiors that he return the absentees and deserters who inflated his ranks (nearly 1,000 in number) to their original commands.      Around this same time,  an old acquaintance from Me...
Read more