Beastly Drunk: The Dismissal of Colonel William B. Cassilly 69th Ohio

The sounds of battle still reverberated amongst the hills of middle Tennessee when Colonel Timothy Stanley of the 18th Ohio wrote his official report of the Battle of Stones River. His command, the 29th Brigade of General James S. Negley’s Division consisting of the 19th Illinois, 11th Michigan, 18th Ohio, 69th Ohio, and Battery M, 1st Ohio Light Artillery, had taken part in some of the toughest fighting of the battle in a section of cedar forest now known as the Slaughter Pen. His brigade had suffered heavy casualties in its failed attempt to stem the Confederate tide. He was proud of his men. “They acted with bravery expected of well-disciplined troops fighting in a just cause,” he wrote. “They stood manfully and bravely the appalling fire of a much larger force.” But there was, unfortunately, one exception.

          “Early in the action of this day [December 31, 1862] I discovered that Colonel William B. Cassilly of the 69th Ohio Volunteers was so drunk as to be unfitted for command,” Stanley wrote with scarcely disguised anger. “I ordered him to the rear in arrest.” Stanley placed Major Eli Hickcox in command but in the resulting engagement, Hickcox was injured and command devolved to a pair of captains. The 69th Ohio with its men, “much mortified at the conduct of their Colonel” as reported in the Cadiz Sentinel, “did but little service in the action” wrote Colonel Stanley due to the command confusion engendered by Cassilly’s drunkenness.
Colonel Timothy R. Stanley
18th Ohio Infantry

          “I recommend the dismissal of Colonel Cassilly from the service. I cannot for a moment tolerate or pass over such flagrant conduct. I saw nothing of him after the action, but have learned that he was wounded and had gone to Nashville. A man who will come to the field of battle, having the lives of so many in his keeping, in such a situation, no matter what his social position, is totally unfit for any command,” Stanley concluded. The Cadiz Sentinel, quoting a letter from a member of the 69th Ohio, stated that Cassilly “was stupidly, beastly drunk.”

          Much had been expected from Colonel Cassilly based on his length of time in service and general good conduct. Born in April 1824 in Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, his family had moved to Cincinnati, Ohio by the early 1830s where Cassilly attended the prestigious Woodward School and served several terms on Cincinnati City Council while working as an insurance agent. At the outbreak of the war in April 1861, he joined the 10th Ohio Volunteer Infantry, serving three months as regimental quartermaster. Then he led a Cincinnati contingent of the Benton Cadets in Missouri for another three months before obtaining a commission as lieutenant colonel of the 69th Ohio Infantry in January 1862. While Colonel Cassilly’s defense against this charge doesn’t reside in the Official Records, he did have a card published in the January 23, 1863 issue of the Cincinnati Commercial asking for “a suspension of public opinion on the charge of drunkenness in the late battle of Stones River until I am able to obtain a court of inquiry.” [This never happened.] The colonel then gave his own description of what occurred on the morning of December 31, 1862.
While this map focuses on the regiments of Colonel Frederick Miller's brigade, Stanley's brigade is located just to the left and this portion of the battlefield has been preserved as part of the Stones River National Battlefield. 

          “On the morning of the 31st, my regiment was in the advance of the brigade which was in a thicket of cedars some 200 yards in the rear. We were not informed of our right being turned until the enemy appeared in force on our right flank, when we were ordered back to form with the balance of the  brigade. In returning, as we were ascending a small hill, my horse was shot through the leg. I dismounted to examine his wound and was in doing so, my saddle turned and I was delayed some time in adjusting that and examining the wound of my horse to see if he could carry me. Upon remounting I found that regiment had passed over the hill and out of sight. Just as I took up the reigns to ride after them, I received a wound through the left arm, shattering the bone. I took out my handkerchief to bind it up, when someone rode up and assisted me, after which the person took hold of the bridle of my horse and proposed to lead me off, which I declined. But at the same moment I felt myself growing faint until my head rested on the neck of my horse. I remember no more until I raised my head and found myself on the turnpike road at least a mile if not more from the place where I was wounded. When I came to, the same person was leading my horse and a young man walking along side holding me on. On attempting to rise, I again became faint and fell off when I was put in an ambulance and driven to Nashville.” Interestingly, Cassilly makes no mention (or has no memory) of Colonel Stanley putting him under arrest.

Stanley’s report worked its way up the chain of command, being approved and forward by both Generals Negley and Thomas before arriving at General William Rosecrans’ headquarters. Here an order was promptly cut dismissing Colonel Cassilly from the service effective January 16, 1863. The action of dismissing officers was governed by General Orders No. 4 and  No. 9 issued November 9, 1862 by General Rosecrans headquarters which states that “whenever an order mustering out or dismissing an officer is given from these headquarters, it will be sent through the proper commanders to the commanding officer of the regiment or detachment to which the culprit belongs. It will be the duty of the immediate commander to cause the command to be assembled and the order published to it as soon as practicable. He will cause the culprit to appear in front of the command, uncovered, while the order is read, and after its publication, the Adjutant will strip from him, in presence of the command, his shoulder straps and all other marks of rank; after which he will be conducted by the guards to the lines of the command.”

          A reporter for the Chicago Tribune stated that Colonel Cassilly was spared this humiliation because of the wound he sustained in the battle. “Colonel Cassilly stood fair as an officer and gentleman in the army” and it was speculated that his social standing also mitigated against the full enforcement of Order No. 9. [General Rosecrans, being a Cincinnati resident, may have known Cassilly personally.] Cassilly returned home to Cincinnati, his postwar years spent selling insurance and serving on city council. He was a proud member of the Woodward Club and died July 24, 1888 at age 64. Colonel Cassilly is buried at Spring Grove Cemetery in Cincinnati, his stone making no mention of his Civil War services with the 10th and 69th Ohio regiments or the Benton Cadets. Regardless, for Colonel Cassilly, the Civil War was over and his name is largely remembered in that context not for deeds of valor on the battlefield, but for his affinity with the bottle.

          For a nice wartime image of Colonel Cassilly, I recommend checking out David Holcomb’s article on “Hard Drinking Colonels” from Military Images magazine.

Comments

Post a Comment

Most Popular Posts

Arming the Buckeyes: Longarms of the Ohio Infantry Regiments

Image
     A common question that comes up in conversation about Civil War Buckeye regiments is "What were they armed with?" We are fortunate in that the state of Ohio kept good records of how the regiments were armed when they went into service, this being especially true for those regiments which went into service in 1861 and 1862. The state adjutant general's reports for 1861 and 1862 have been heavily drawn upon to construct this article, as well as consultation with Phil Spaugy who has done extensive research on how Ohio's troops were armed during the war.      Buckeyes carried a fairly wide variety of weapons into the field, and the below article breaks this down into weapons of both domestic manufacture and imported arms. The early days of the war found the state of Ohio practically bereft of longarms; as an example, when the 1st and 2nd Ohio Volunteer Militia left the state in late April 1861, they left unarmed, being armed at Lancaster, Pennsylvania on t...
Read more

Bullets for the Union: Manufacturing Small Arms Ammunition During the Civil War

Image
       Civil War bullets are perhaps the most common item collected from the era; the two armies expended bullets by the millions during the four years’ conflict and spent or deformed bullets of all shapes and sizes have made fascinating and affordable collectibles since the guns went silent in 1865.       I recently acquired a display piece featuring 35 different types of small arms ammunition used during the Civil War, including everything from a small .28 caliber ball up to a .69 caliber three-ring Minie and it triggered some questions: how did the Federal army obtain its small arms ammunition during the war? Where did the lead come from to make the bullets, and where and how was the ammunition manufactured? This post seeks to answer those questions. A typical .58 caliber 3-ring Minie bullet   “Whenever the blasts of war blow in the ears of men who trade in the implements of destruction, they are apt to experience more joy than the true ...
Read more

Dressing the Rebels: How to Dye Butternut Jeans Cloth

Image
     In the early days of the Civil War,  the Southern states found themselves with an abundance of cotton but a shortage of cloth with which to make army uniforms. The trade in cloth prior to the war had largely been to send raw cotton or wool north to New England (or Great Britain) where it was converted into usable cloth; but now that trade was broken and the Southern states were thrown upon their own resources in their efforts to properly clothe the Confederate army.  This collection of Confederate enlisted men's frock coats and shell jackets gives some indication of the variety of shades of butternut worn during the war. All of them are shades of yellow brown, some heavier on the yellow and some heavier on the brown. The blue used around the collar or as rank insignia indicates that the soldier was in the infantry. Surviving Confederate uniforms are considered rather rare and command quite a healthy price in the collecting market. For an in-depth study of h...
Read more

The Wizard of Oz and the Civil War

Image
T he 1939 film The Wizard of Oz has delighted viewers for 85 years and ranks as a personal favorite, especially during the Halloween season. While watching it with the family the other night, I wondered if there were any connections between the film and the Civil War. Not surprisingly, the answer is yes and those connections touch both the blue and the gray.           Interestingly both “witches” in the film not only had Civil War ancestors but had connections with Civil War soldiers from Ohio. Margaret Hamilton, the “Wicked Witch of the West,” was born in Cleveland, Ohio on December 9, 1902, to attorney Walter Jones Hamilton and his wife Mary Jane Adams; Margaret’s grandfather was Judge Edwin Timothy Hamilton. Judge Hamilton had served as a private in Co. D of the 84 th Ohio Infantry during the summer of 1862. The 84 th Ohio, a three months’ regiment, served nearly the whole of its service attached to the Railroad District in western Ma...
Read more

The Vaunted Enfield Rifle Musket

Image
     The English-made Model 1853 .577 caliber Enfield Rifle Musket was widely regarded as the best infantry arm in the world at the outbreak of the Civil War in April 1861. Favorable international press describing its efficiency in the Crimean War and in suppressing the Indian rebellion led to the widespread desire of American infantrymen (both Federal and Confederate) to be armed with these accurate and well-made arms. The lock plate of this well-worn P1853 Enfield rifle musket produced in 1862 shows the typical markings of a British-made weapon that made it through the Federal blockade.  ( Army of Tennessee Relics ) Enfield-pattern weapons were imported into the states by the tens and hundreds of thousands during the war years; one estimate stated that the Federal government purchased 500,000 while the Confederates purchased another 400,000. The Confederate government dispatched Captain Caleb Huse to Europe in April 1861 to purchase weapons and Huse focused on se...
Read more

In front of Atlanta with the 68th Ohio

Image
  The arrow corps badge of the 17th Army Corps was worn by many members of the 68th Ohio in the latter days of the war.       Private Edward A. Bigelow of Co. F of the 68th Ohio Volunteer Infantry wrote this brief account of the Battle of Atlanta just two days afterwards to his father back home in Henry County, Ohio. The regiment formed a part of Colonel Robert K. Scott's three regiment all-Ohio brigade consisting of the 20th, 68th, and 78th regiments, being designated the Second Brigade of the Third Division of Frank Blair's 17th Army Corps. Bigelow's letter originally appeared in the Napoleon Press newspaper and was copied in the Toledo Daily Commercial which was providential as no known copies exist today of the wartime Napoleon Press.  
Read more

Charging Battery Robinett: An Alabama Soldier Recalls the Vicious Fighting at Corinth

Image
W riting 30 years after the Battle of Corinth, James A. McKinstry of the 42 nd Alabama recalled his experiences storming Battery Robinett with Colonel William P. Rogers of the 2 nd Texas and expressed guilt that it was perhaps his action that brought about the colonel’s demise. “On seeing a line of Federals approaching, and before giving the situation a thought, I immediately raised my gun and fired full into the breast of a Federal sergeant, who was in front of the column, and only a short distance from us.  'Twas then that Captain George Foster shouted, "Cease firing, men! cease firing!" and waved his handkerchief, then I realized the true situation. 'Twas too late! That fatal volley had been turned on our little band from the muzzles of 1,500 muskets. I was still standing just as I was when I fired my last shot, and within a few feet of Colonel Rogers, when a Minie ball went crashing through my left hip and turned me half round; another went tearing through my ...
Read more

Cook & Brother of New Orleans

Image
    The lockplate of a New Orleans-made Cook & Brother Enfield rifle produced in 1862 shows the fine craftsmanship that became the hallmark of the maker throughout the Civil War. Note the stars and bars flag at left, an emblem used on C&B's production throughout the war and the Cook & Brother, N.O. 1862 markings. Earlier production weapons at New Orleans had the flag located just above the maker's name while later weapons produced in Athens, Georgia would have a modified flag and Athens on the plate followed by the serial number.        In the spring of 1861, two English-born businessmen, Ferdinand and Francis Cook of New Orleans, perceived the need for the South to have its own domestic production of firearms and  set out to prove "that rifles could made here as well as in Yankee land or in Europe." The brothers  elected to produce copies of the British Model 1853 .577 caliber Enfield rifle as this was considered the benchmark longarm...
Read more

An Interview with Forrest in May 1864

Image
  “The noise of battle is the only music that ravishes the senses of Forrest.” I t was May 1864. Back east, the Army of Northern Virginia and the Army of the Potomac were locked in the deadly dance of the Overland Campaign while in Georgia, General William Tecumseh Sherman's army squared off against General Joseph E. Johnston and the Army of the Tennessee in the campaign for Atlanta.       Based in relatively quiet northern Mississippi, General Nathan Bedford Forrest bided his time waiting for a Federal advance from Memphis. Earlier in the month, General Samuel Sturgis led a brief campaign into Mississippi but Forrest was sure Sturgis would venture out again. In the meantime, he tried to keep his reorganized command intact despite persistent demands from his superiors that he return the absentees and deserters who inflated his ranks (nearly 1,000 in number) to their original commands.      Around this same time,  an old acquaintance from Me...
Read more

I Want to See a Battle: A Hoosier at Shiloh

Image
W riting in his diary, Private Manius Buchanan of the 29 th Indiana recalled the eagerness with which his regiment marched towards Savannah, Tennessee with the sounds of the battle of Shiloh ringing in their ears.           “The forced march was kept up until 2 p.m. when we were halted until 4 p.m,” he noted. “The rest was really needed, but the continual question is ‘Why are we stopped here?’ The sound of battle increased in volume and anxiety to be up and doing grows more intense. As I am weak from a late sickness, I am urged to fall to the rear; but no, in common with all, I want to see a battle and fear this will be my only chance.” The regiment would go into action the following afternoon, and of the four neighborhood boys who had enlisted together in Co. B, only Buchanan escaped unscathed. One afternoon's exposure to the horrors of battle was all it took to satisfy this Hoosier's desire to see the elephant. “I wanted to see a battl...
Read more