Not German Poltroons: The 61st Ohio Explains Chancellorsville

Following the unsuccessful conclusion of the Chancellorsville campaign, a number of eastern newspapers (led by Horace Greeley who edited the widely read New York Daily Tribune) laid the blame for the failure to defeat Robert E. Lee's army squarely at the feet of the conduct of the 11th Corps on May 2, 1863. "If the 11th Corps had held its ground, the defeat and destruction of Jackson would have been inevitable, but when they fled, it became necessary to recall Sickles and the whole maneuver was foiled. General Howard who commanded it is a brave and skillful general, but neither his efforts nor those of General Devens and General Schurz could arrest the panic. We trust that swift justice will overtake the regiments that broke; that if it be deemed too rigid to shoot them all, they may at least be decimated and then dissolved.” 

 General Carl Schurz described the effect this type of "publicity" had on his troops, exhausted and bloodied after a hard campaign. "“Every newspaper that fell into our hands told the world the frightful story of the unexampled misconduct of the 11th Corps, how the ‘cowardly Dutchmen’ of that corps had thrown down their arms and fled at the first fire of the enemy, how my division led in the disgraceful flight without firing a shot, how these cowardly Dutch like a herd of frightened sheep had overrun the whole battlefield and come near stampeding other brigades or divisions, in short, the whole failure of the Army of the Potomac was owing to the scandalous poltroonery of the 11th Corps. We procured whatever newspapers we could obtain- newspapers from New York, Washington, Philadelphia, Boston, Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago, Milwaukee- the same story everywhere. I was thunderstruck." 
Major General Carl Schurz
Commanding Third Division, XI Corps

 Major General Oliver O. Howard, soon after his return to camp, couldn’t help but notice the damaging news coverage and the pronounced effect it had on the men of his command. He issued the following general order touching upon the recent disaster at Chancellorsville and expressing his confidence in the men:

 Headquarters, Eleventh Army Corps, May 10, 1863
General Orders No. 9
As your commanding general, I cannot fail to notice a feeling of depression on the part of a portion of this corps. Some obloquy has been cast upon us on account of the affair of Saturday May 2. I believe that such a disaster might have happened to any other corps of this army and I do no mistrust my command. Every officer who failed to do his duty by not keeping his men together and not rallying them when broken is conscious of it and must profit by the past.

 I confidently believe that every honorable officer and every brave man earnestly desires and opportunity to advance against the enemy and to demonstrate to the army and to the country that we are not wanting in principle or patriotism. Your energy, sustained and directed under the Divine blessing, shall yet place the Eleventh Corps ahead of them all.
O.O. Howard, Major General, commanding

 While the eastern newspapers howled at the cowardly Germans of the 11th Corps, the native-born Ohioans of the corps took to the pages of their local newspapers to make the case that they were being made the scapegoats for command negligence on the part of Hooker and Howard. Today's blog post features two accounts from soldiers serving in the 61st Ohio Volunteer Infantry that make this point. 

 The 61st, along with the 82nd Illinois,  68th and 157th New York, and the 74th Pennsylvania, formed Brigadier General Alexander Schimmelfennig's First Brigade of Carl Schurz's Third Division. The 82nd Illinois, 68th New York, and 74th Pennsylvania were predominantly German in character, while the 61st Ohio was composed of typically Anglo-Saxon farmers, shop keepers, and mechanics from throughout Ohio. The two letters aim to put the 61st Ohio in a better light than its brigade mates, claiming that the Buckeyes held their ground while its German neighbors fled. 

On May 2, 1863, the brigade line lay along the Plank Road to the east of General Charles Devens' First Division, Devens' Division being the right flank of the corps and the Army of the Potomac. The 74th Pennsylvania lay to the west of the 61st Ohio, the 68th New York to the east, while the 82nd Illinois and 157th New York lay behind the line in reserve. It is worth noting that the brigade line faced south; when Jackson's flank attack struck Devens from the west, the line was completely flanked and as Devens' units fell back along the Plank Road, the panic spread quickly to the rest of the units caught up in the maelstrom. As Colonel John C. Lee of the 55th Ohio stated, the "rank and file of the 11th Corps are no more to be blamed for the rout than the pins in a bowling alley for falling when struck by the ball.”
Colonel Stephen J. McGroarty, 61st Ohio Volunteer Infantry

 Private Henry B. Nichols, Co. K, 61st Ohio Volunteer Infantry
Published in the Wyandot Pioneer, June 12, 1863
Near Brook’s Station, Va.
May 27, 1863

          Editor of the Pioneer:
          Once more I make an attempt to write you a few lines, feeling confident that many readers of your paper would gladly hear from us. There has been many attempts made in some papers which have had but little to do in reference to our corps, which they proclaim did not act exactly right in the Battle of Chancellorsville. It was also sketched by A.R. Waud in Harpers’ Weekly whom, I have no doubt, received his information by hearsay or probably got a bird’s eye view on a hasty retreat. We doubt that the said gentleman remained in those parts long enough to sketch an ox, which he has by some means so gloriously pictured out. If the said artist would get his shoulder at the butt end of a musket, he may find a better chance to display some of his loyalty. Pictures don’t put down the rebellion.
 
Alfred R. Waud sketch used to produce the print in Harper's Weekly that drew Nichols' ire. Note the ox front and center. "If the said artist would get his shoulder at the butt end of a musket, he may find a better chance to display some of his loyalty. Picture's don't put down the rebellion," Nichols grumped in a letter sent to the Wyandot Pioneer.
          The New York Herald and Washington Chronicle seem to have but little to do. I wonder if they ever saw a hard tack, things men misrepresent very much. However, they may be posted for something to write. Let me state that the 68th New York was the very first to run, and the 74th Pennsylvania next. This is not the first time the 68th New York done the like. At the Battle of Cross Keys they done some very tall walking. Some of them I believe went into the state of New York before they halted. How does the Herald like such fighting? Would it not be better to look at home affairs before opening out so large, because one or two regiments didn’t stand up to the rack, should the whole corps stand the blunt?
 
Bad Behavior of the Eleventh Corps
          We are aware than when the right or left wing is in the act of being turned, that it is a mighty unhealthy place, and men are few that would not wish to be out, yet where our duty calls us, there we intend to be. And if we are among the unlucky who fall, it is not to be done again. Although our force was small and we had no entrenchments, not a man left until he was ordered back by the commanding officers, except the two regiments I have mentioned and when they left all was confusion. Had the Rebs come when we expected, we should have been ready for them, but they came when we least expected and when our breastworks done but little good. There are many here from Wyandot County in the 55th and 61st Ohio regiments. I wish we had as many more instead of some regiments I know of…

          Major General Howard is beloved by his men for his bravery, and as a good officer, he is worthy of the office he fills. However, he has but one arm which makes it rather inconvenient should he have an occasion to the dry knocks with the Rebs, he will find regiments at his service. I will except one or two regiments for they undoubtedly would be out of hearing.

          The wounded of the late battle across the Rappahannock are getting along fine. I passed through the hospitals a few days ago and they are in good spirits. Many of them will start for home as soon as they are able to travel whilst others only slightly wounded are returning to their regiments and are again ready for the next move. I might mention many from Wyandot County who were taken prisoners, but no doubt your readers have heard from them before this reaches you. They are in Maryland paroled, waiting to be exchanged. Many regiments have left this corps, their time having expired and are now homeward bound marching to the tune of “The girl I left behind me.”

Yours,
H.B. Nichols

Captain Henry R. Bending
Co. I, 61st O.V.I.



Letter from J.M. Reynolds, member of the band of the 61st Ohio Volunteer Infantry
Published in the Wyandot Pioneer, May 29, 1863

Headquarters, 61st Regt. Ohio Vols., Camp near Stafford Courthouse, Virginia

May 16, 1863

Captain Joseph McCutchen, sir,
          You have no doubt ere this, heard and read a great deal in regard to the recent ten days’ campaign south of the Rappahannock. I suppose our Wyandot County friends have formed various and conflicting opinions in regard to the conduct of the 11th Corps to which our regiment is attached. Having been with the army on the whole march and witnessed with my own eyes every moment of the battle, I believe it due to the public to state the facts as they transpired and leave the consequences and results to the public opinion, which, when truthfully made upon solid and substantial facts, is never wrong.

          It is needless to saw much of our march over the river. We arrived on the ground near where the battle was fought on the 30th of last month at 6 p.m. Here we encamped for the night. Next morning, which was Saturday, we were ordered into line of battle, our corps being the extreme right wing of the army but little skirmishing was going on all day in the woods in front of our lines. All the news we received during the day was that the enemy was retreating towards Gordonsville. We expected to follow them as soon as the facts could be ascertained. No one dreamed of anything but an easy and decisive victory and a perfect success. The officers and men of our regiment were, without exception, so far as I could discover, in better spirits than I ever saw them before.
 
General Oliver O. Howard's 11th Corps Headquarters flag
          The right wing was defended by the First Division; the 74th Pennsylvania of our brigade was on the right of our brigade and the 61st were in front facing south. Between 3 and 4 o’clock we heard considerable skirmishing near us on our right, and supposed it was nothing more than playing with a few of the enemy’s cavalry. Not expecting an attack from that quarter but being prepared to receive them should they make their appearance in front, we were ready to give them such as reception as they would remember during the war.

But in a moment as it were without the slightest notice, with the exception of a little skirmishing spoken of above, as we were standing in line in the road, the balls came whistling down the road parallel with our lines. At almost the same moment, or immediately after, the 74th Pennsylvania which was stationed on the right of our brigade came rushing through our ranks and over us. The other regiments from the First Division, who had been stationed to guard the flank, were seen flying in every direction. The enemy of not less than 20,000 came rushing after at full speed, carrying their cartridges in their pockets with no load save their gun, without coat, cartridge box, knapsack, or anything of the sort, firing and yelling as they ran. 
General Alexander Schimmelfennig

During the confusion and the complete surprise, the 61st Ohio stood as firm as a rock, the ground in front of us plowed up by shells, our artillery flying through our ranks without firing a shot. The artillerymen had been picked off by the Rebel sharpshooters. Colonel McGroarty rallied his regiment, and every officer and man was in his proper place and never budged an inch until the command came to fall back. This was done in good order by taking a near road which had been cut that morning by the order of General Schimmelfennig of our brigade.

11th Corps position along the Plank Road on the evening of May 2, 1863

The public mind may be already full of false rumors in regard to the recent conduct of the 11th Corps, but the matter must be righted. There are hundreds of Ohio troops in the 11th Corps of the Army of the Potomac. I have witnessed the conduct of these troops on other occasions. No man lives who dare stand up and charge them with cowardice. Speaking not for myself, but for them. I am not a soldier in the ranks, neither am I an officer. I am a member of the band, but I have had the luck to be in every battle the regiment has ever been in, sharing with them the honor of success and sympathizing with them in all our reverses. Are the officers or the men of a single regiment to blame for our surprise? Was it not the business of the commanding generals to see to it that our right wing was properly supported?

On whom then does the blame rest? General Hooker was in command of the army, General Howard in command of the corps, Carl Schurz of the division, and Schimmelfennig of the brigade. Let the facts be ascertained and let the blunder rest where it belongs. One thing is certain: there is no blame to be attached to any regiment from Ohio. The 61st Ohio I have been with for 12 months and they have been in many warm places. They never yet were known to flinch and this was the hottest place we ever yet were in, but I never knew officers or men so cool or determined and willing to do their duty. All our field officers were present: Colonel McGroarty, Lieutenant Colonel H. Brown, Major Becket, Adjutant Williams, and all acted nobly. So it was also with our line officers and all the men. They never exhibited more bravery or more heroism than on this occasion. Our regiment lost 130 men killed, wounded, and missing. Hue B. Thatcher is one of the missing, but the Little Sandusky boys came out all right.

Yours respectfully,
J.M. Reynolds

Comments

Post a Comment

Most Popular Posts

Arming the Buckeyes: Longarms of the Ohio Infantry Regiments

Image
     A common question that comes up in conversation about Civil War Buckeye regiments is "What were they armed with?" We are fortunate in that the state of Ohio kept good records of how the regiments were armed when they went into service, this being especially true for those regiments which went into service in 1861 and 1862. The state adjutant general's reports for 1861 and 1862 have been heavily drawn upon to construct this article, as well as consultation with Phil Spaugy who has done extensive research on how Ohio's troops were armed during the war.      Buckeyes carried a fairly wide variety of weapons into the field, and the below article breaks this down into weapons of both domestic manufacture and imported arms. The early days of the war found the state of Ohio practically bereft of longarms; as an example, when the 1st and 2nd Ohio Volunteer Militia left the state in late April 1861, they left unarmed, being armed at Lancaster, Pennsylvania on their way to
Read more

Dressing the Rebels: How to Dye Butternut Jeans Cloth

Image
     In the early days of the Civil War,  the Southern states found themselves with an abundance of cotton but a shortage of cloth with which to make army uniforms. The trade in cloth prior to the war had largely been to send raw cotton or wool north to New England (or Great Britain) where it was converted into usable cloth; but now that trade was broken and the Southern states were thrown upon their own resources in their efforts to properly clothe the Confederate army.  This collection of Confederate enlisted men's frock coats and shell jackets gives some indication of the variety of shades of butternut worn during the war. All of them are shades of yellow brown, some heavier on the yellow and some heavier on the brown. The blue used around the collar or as rank insignia indicates that the soldier was in the infantry. Surviving Confederate uniforms are considered rather rare and command quite a healthy price in the collecting market. For an in-depth study of how Confederate jacke
Read more

Bullets for the Union: Manufacturing Small Arms Ammunition During the Civil War

Image
       Civil War bullets are perhaps the most common item collected from the era; the two armies expended bullets by the millions during the four years’ conflict and spent or deformed bullets of all shapes and sizes have made fascinating and affordable collectibles since the guns went silent in 1865.       I recently acquired a display piece featuring 35 different types of small arms ammunition used during the Civil War, including everything from a small .28 caliber ball up to a .69 caliber three-ring Minie and it triggered some questions: how did the Federal army obtain its small arms ammunition during the war? Where did the lead come from to make the bullets, and where and how was the ammunition manufactured? This post seeks to answer those questions. A typical .58 caliber 3-ring Minie bullet   “Whenever the blasts of war blow in the ears of men who trade in the implements of destruction, they are apt to experience more joy than the true warrior, for then comes the harvest of gain.
Read more

The Cannons are Now Silent: The Field of Death of Tupelo

Image
       The smoke of battle had drifted away from the battlefield at Tupelo, Mississippi on the hot afternoon of July 14, 1864, but the carnage of war lay spread across the open fields. “Scattered at intervals over the field of a few yards are dull gray blotches half shaded by grass,” an officer from the 7 th Minnesota Infantry recorded. “These are the Rebel dead. They have fought their last battle and lie generally in attitudes of rest; some of them look as if they had welcomed death. On the faces of two is imprinted a smile. One is a boy of 16 with delicate features, almost girlish in their beauty. His last gaze seems to have been directed toward his hand on the forefinger of which was a ring. A circle of purer white indicates its place; the ring was carried off as a trophy of the field.” The following account of the Battles of Tupelo and Old Town Creek was written by an unknown officer of the 7 th Minnesota Infantry, his account appearing in the August 5 th 1864 edition of the
Read more

The Vaunted Enfield Rifle Musket

Image
     The English-made Model 1853 .577 caliber Enfield Rifle Musket was widely regarded as the best infantry arm in the world at the outbreak of the Civil War in April 1861. Favorable international press describing its efficiency in the Crimean War and in suppressing the Indian rebellion led to the widespread desire of American infantrymen (both Federal and Confederate) to be armed with these accurate and well-made arms. The lock plate of this well-worn P1853 Enfield rifle musket produced in 1862 shows the typical markings of a British-made weapon that made it through the Federal blockade.  ( Army of Tennessee Relics ) Enfield-pattern weapons were imported into the states by the tens and hundreds of thousands during the war years; one estimate stated that the Federal government purchased 500,000 while the Confederates purchased another 400,000. The Confederate government dispatched Captain Caleb Huse to Europe in April 1861 to purchase weapons and Huse focused on securing all the Enfi
Read more

Straw Already Threshed: Sherman on Shiloh

Image
  W illiam Tecumseh Sherman was enjoying retired life in New York City when just before Christmas in 1889 he was presented with an article written by John Cockerill, a former drummer boy in the 24 th Ohio who was visiting his father Colonel Joseph Cockerill of the 70 th Ohio of Sherman’s division when the Battle of Shiloh began. Cockerill’s article, originally published in the New York Journalist and later featured in the January 1893 issue of Blue & Gray Magazine, Sherman later pronounced as “the best war story ever written” and the truest account of Shiloh.           On New Year’s Day 1890, General Sherman composed the following letter to his friend Marshall P. Wilder thanking him for sending along Cockerill’s article and giving his own explanation of Shiloh. “This to me is straw already threshed for we have fought this battle on paper several times, a much more agreeable task than to fight with bullets,” he concluded. “When in England some years ago I was gratified to liste
Read more

Federal Arms in the Stones River Campaign

Image
  T he following list, constructed after many years of research, lists unit by unit which type of weapons were carried by the Army of the Cumberland during the Stones River campaign. A number of sources were consulted including state ordnance reports, Federal quarterly ordnance reports (thank you Research Arsenal ), Ken Baumann’s Arming the Suckers, regimental histories and memoirs, captured ordnance reports, and consultation with knowledgeable experts in the field of firearms. Some of this information has been shared on the blog before in “ Rosy’s Heavy Metal: Artillery of the Army of the Cumberland ” or “ Shoulder Arms: How Sheridan’s and Davis’s Divisions Were Armed at Stones River ” but this is the first time the army as a whole has been presented. The overall conclusion I drew from looking at this data is that the Army of the Cumberland in December 1862 was an organization in the midst of transformation as far as arms. Many of the regiments still retained their original issue
Read more

Escape of Captain Henry H. Alban of the 21st Ohio Infantry

Image
Captain Henry H. Alban was among the dozen officers of the 21 st Ohio Volunteer Infantry who were captured on September 20, 1863 at the Battle of Chickamauga. The regiment had held its position atop Snodgrass Hill against repeated Confederate assaults and now battered and without ammunition, with the darkness of evening enveloping the hill, the remainder of that gallant band found themselves at the mercy of the 54 th Virginia. A total of 12 officers and 121 enlisted men surrendered; the regiment’s colors were taken, and the men marched off the field into captivity. Captain Henry Harvey Alban, Co. F, 21st O.V.I. Captain Alban along with the rest went through a series of Confederate prison camps before arriving at Columbia, South Carolina in October 1864. Determined to make an escape, he watched for his chance and one night made his leap for freedom, successfully eluding the local camp guard and setting out along the railroad to head for the mountains of eastern Tennessee and
Read more

Knapsack Compression: Wilbur Hinman recalls the first step of becoming a veteran

Image
L ooking back on his experiences during the war, Captain Wilbur Hinman of the 65 th Ohio (perhaps best known as the author of Si Klegg and His Pard ) recalled that the first road along which his regiment marched was strewn “with debris. A pair of six-mule wagonloads might have been gathered of notions that had been flung aside by a thousand suffering “tenderfeet.” “The average young patriot started for the war with a wheelbarrow load of clothing, a bed quilt or two, books, photograph albums, toilet articles, and gimcracks of every sort,” he wrote. “Neither he nor the good homefolks had the slightest conception of the capacity of a knapsack, nor did they for a moment imagine that before the close of his first day upon the road every pound he carried would seem a hundred.” To the true mark of a veteran soldier was one who “learned to dispense with every unnecessary ounce of weight, and just in the ratio that he did this he increased his efficiency as a soldier. It was of the highest
Read more

Federal Arms in the Chickamauga Campaign

Image
T he ordnance returns of the Army of the Cumberland at the end of September 1863 show the results of a transformational year in weaponry. Since taking command of the army at the end of October 1862, General William S. Rosecrans had repeatedly pestered the War Department to supply his regiments with better firearms both to improve the command’s efficiency as well as expand its striking power. The results speak for themselves: for the infantrymen at the end of September 1863, 90% of them now carried Class I long arms (36,058 out of 39,959), 8.3% carried Class II arms, and a mere 1.5% carried Class III weapons. Most of the foreign-made weapons (except Enfields) were gone, and by and large the army had settled on a single common .58 caliber ammunition, although a few .54 caliber and .69 caliber weapons remained within the ranks. The English-made Enfield rifle musket was by far the most common arm, carried by 56% of the men while the second-most common arm was the .58 caliber M1861 Spring
Read more