Pummeled at Grand Gulf

     In one of the opening operations of General U.S. Grant’s Vicksburg campaign, the gunboat U.S.S. Tuscumbia along with several other gunboats under the command of Admiral David D. Porter attacked the Confederate riverside fortifications at Grand Gulf on April 29, 1863. The chief engineer, working in the 108-degree heat of the engine room, recalled that the vessel was struck 82 times during the engagement.

“It is impossible to count the shells that exploded in her,” Engineer John W. Hartupee wrote. “Her upper work is a complete wreck. No man could have lived on her deck for a minute. It is believed here that we were under the heaviest fire ever known to naval warfare. The Rebels concentrated all their fire upon us for at least two hours. More than half the time during the fight we were not more than 50 yards from the muzzles of 30 guns and some of these guns were 100-lb Parrott guns which throw projectiles with greater force than any gun now in use. But all would not do as they could not penetrate the iron sides of the Tuscumbia. We received more shots than all the other vessels combined, but our plating proved perfectly invulnerable against all efforts to penetrate it,” he concluded proudly.

The Tuscumbia had been in service less than two months when it went into action at Grand Gulf. Its first action had taken place a few weeks prior when the vessel ran past the guns of Vicksburg on the night of April 16-17. A 915-ton vessel built by Joseph Brown’s firm in Cincinnati, Ohio, the gunboat measured 178 feet long, 75 feet abeam, and drew seven feet of water. Manned by a crew of 130 officers and men while armed with three 11” and two 9” Dahlgren smoothbores, the Tuscumbia had five engines which gave it a top speed of ten knots.

John Hartupee’s letter describing the engagement at Grand Gulf originally saw publication in the May 30, 1863 edition of the Princeton Clarion published in Princeton, Indiana.

 

The 915-ton gunboat U.S.S. Tuscumbia was launched December 2, 1862 at Joseph Brown's yard in Cincinnati, Ohio and commissioned into service March 12, 1863 at New Albany, Indiana. The gunboat promptly steamed south on the Ohio and Mississippi rivers to support Grant's campaign to take Vicksburg. The Tuscumbia took a beating from Rebel batteries at Grand Gulf but despite taking 82 hits and being disabled, the vessel afloat and was ready for duty mere days after the engagement. 

 

On board gunboat Tuscumbia

Lying off Grand Gulf, Mississippi

May 4, 1863

          Believing you would like to hear from the Tuscumbia and those on board, I will write you a few lines. In the first place I will give you a short extract from the engineer’s log belonging to this vessel.

April 29, 1863: Received orders to raise steam and prepare for action and got underway at 7:15 a.m. Engagement opened at 10 o’clock by the gunboats Pittsburg, Carondelet, Louisville, and Mound City on the lower batteries. The gunboat Lafayette entered the engagement and opened fire on the middle battery while the gunboats Benton and Tuscumbia enter the engagement. We engage the upper battery and open a brisk fire with our 11-inch guns at 400 yards. The engagement becomes general and a shell enters the forward porthole, exploding in the turret killing three men and wounding eleven. Engines working well with steam at 120 lbs pressure; First Engineer Perry South and Third Assistant Engineer Benjamin Bull on the engines.

At 11 o’clock, the engines are working well with steam at 115 lbs pressure and thermometer at 105 degrees in the engine room. A shell entered the upper pilot house wounding Joseph McCammant, pilot. Hog chains all shot away but one; a shell entered the port side passing through the cylinder timbers and setting the vessel on fire. The fire was soon extinguished and First Assistant Engineer Joseph Hillard and Third Assistant Engineer William Millegan at engines.

At noon, the engines are working well with steam pressure at 120 lbs and the thermometer at 107 degrees. Two shells entered our port side exploding between the cylinder timbers tearing Perry South’s engine room to fragments. No one was hurt. A shell entered our port side exploding in the after turret, killing two men and wounding nine. Second Assistant Engineer Homan and Third Assistant Oliver Cough at engines.

1 p.m.: engines working well with steam at 115 lbs and thermometer at 105 in the engine room. A shell entered our starboard side between the cylinder timbers. Firing from guns very heavy as a second shell enters the starboard side exploding between the cylinder timbers. Perry South and Benjamin Bull at engines.

The Tuscumbia is shown as the second vessel from the left in this depiction of the Battle of Grand Gulf. Admiral Porter's gunboats had a tough time with the heavy Confederate guns which ultimately convinced Grant and Porter to stage the amphibious crossing further downriver at Bruinsburg, Mississippi. After the Confederate defeat at Port Gibson on May 1st, Grand Gulf was effectively flanked and the Confederates abandoned the stronghold. 


2 p.m.: A shell entered the wheelhouse carrying away all the wheel chains. Engines working well with steam at 120 lbs. A shell passing through the pilot house shot away all bell wires and starboard speaking trumpet so we handled the engines by passing orders through the port speaking trumpet. Joseph Hilliard and William Millegan at the engines. The port piston breaking caused by the stern of the vessel dropping but working as well as can be expected.

3 p.m.” Starboard engine in good order but the port engine is out of line but not disabled. Steam at 120 lbs and thermometer at 108 degrees in the engine room. A shell entered the starboard side exploding between the port cylinder timbers thus disabling the port engine by breaking full stroke cam yoke. Started the propeller but could not handle the vessel. We came to anchor by changing the cut off yoke to full stroke yoke; got underway in half an hour and worked the engines full stroke, ready for action again. The engagement ended and we landed opposite Grand Gulf.

The engagement lasted 5-1/2 hours and the Tuscumbia received 82 solid shots and it is impossible to count the shells that exploded in her. Her upper work is a complete wreck. No man could have lived on her deck for a minute. It is believed here that we were under the heaviest fire ever known to naval warfare. The Rebels concentrated all their fire upon us for at least two hours. More than half the time during the fight we were not more than 50 yards from the muzzles of 30 guns and some of these guns were 100-lb Parrott guns which throw projectiles with greater force than any gun now in use. But all would not do as they could not penetrate the iron sides of the Tuscumbia. It is believed that we were under heavier fire than the Keokuk at Charleston. We received more shots than all the other vessels combined, but our plating proved perfectly invulnerable against all efforts to penetrate it.

There was one great blunder committed in building the Tuscumbia and that is in the location of her magazine. To give you an idea of this, I will just say that in action the hatches are necessarily left open. When the shell exploded in her turret, the fire from it burned the boy very badly in the face who was stationed in the door of the magazine to pass powder up. This will be altered before the vessel is pronounced fit for action again.

You must not think that the Tuscumbia is disabled beyond repair. She will soon be ready again and her engines are ready now. All she wants is to raise her wheels and weld her wheel chains and that is a short job. I think you will hear a good account of her yet. We took 490 prisoners and I think from what one of them said when he saw the Tuscumbia that gave them as good as they sent. He said, “There is the damn square box that gave us hell and she does not look as if she was hurt.” Since the fight we have buried three men who died from the wounds received making in all eight killed.

 

Source:

Letter from Acting Chief Engineer John White Hartupee, U.S.S. Tuscumbia, Princeton Clarion (Indiana), May 30, 1863, pg. 2

Comments

Post a Comment

Most Popular Posts

Arming the Buckeyes: Longarms of the Ohio Infantry Regiments

Image
     A common question that comes up in conversation about Civil War Buckeye regiments is "What were they armed with?" We are fortunate in that the state of Ohio kept good records of how the regiments were armed when they went into service, this being especially true for those regiments which went into service in 1861 and 1862. The state adjutant general's reports for 1861 and 1862 have been heavily drawn upon to construct this article, as well as consultation with Phil Spaugy who has done extensive research on how Ohio's troops were armed during the war.      Buckeyes carried a fairly wide variety of weapons into the field, and the below article breaks this down into weapons of both domestic manufacture and imported arms. The early days of the war found the state of Ohio practically bereft of longarms; as an example, when the 1st and 2nd Ohio Volunteer Militia left the state in late April 1861, they left unarmed, being armed at Lancaster, Pennsylvania on t...
Read more

Bullets for the Union: Manufacturing Small Arms Ammunition During the Civil War

Image
       Civil War bullets are perhaps the most common item collected from the era; the two armies expended bullets by the millions during the four years’ conflict and spent or deformed bullets of all shapes and sizes have made fascinating and affordable collectibles since the guns went silent in 1865.       I recently acquired a display piece featuring 35 different types of small arms ammunition used during the Civil War, including everything from a small .28 caliber ball up to a .69 caliber three-ring Minie and it triggered some questions: how did the Federal army obtain its small arms ammunition during the war? Where did the lead come from to make the bullets, and where and how was the ammunition manufactured? This post seeks to answer those questions. A typical .58 caliber 3-ring Minie bullet   “Whenever the blasts of war blow in the ears of men who trade in the implements of destruction, they are apt to experience more joy than the true ...
Read more

Dressing the Rebels: How to Dye Butternut Jeans Cloth

Image
     In the early days of the Civil War,  the Southern states found themselves with an abundance of cotton but a shortage of cloth with which to make army uniforms. The trade in cloth prior to the war had largely been to send raw cotton or wool north to New England (or Great Britain) where it was converted into usable cloth; but now that trade was broken and the Southern states were thrown upon their own resources in their efforts to properly clothe the Confederate army.  This collection of Confederate enlisted men's frock coats and shell jackets gives some indication of the variety of shades of butternut worn during the war. All of them are shades of yellow brown, some heavier on the yellow and some heavier on the brown. The blue used around the collar or as rank insignia indicates that the soldier was in the infantry. Surviving Confederate uniforms are considered rather rare and command quite a healthy price in the collecting market. For an in-depth study of h...
Read more

The Wizard of Oz and the Civil War

Image
T he 1939 film The Wizard of Oz has delighted viewers for 85 years and ranks as a personal favorite, especially during the Halloween season. While watching it with the family the other night, I wondered if there were any connections between the film and the Civil War. Not surprisingly, the answer is yes and those connections touch both the blue and the gray.           Interestingly both “witches” in the film not only had Civil War ancestors but had connections with Civil War soldiers from Ohio. Margaret Hamilton, the “Wicked Witch of the West,” was born in Cleveland, Ohio on December 9, 1902, to attorney Walter Jones Hamilton and his wife Mary Jane Adams; Margaret’s grandfather was Judge Edwin Timothy Hamilton. Judge Hamilton had served as a private in Co. D of the 84 th Ohio Infantry during the summer of 1862. The 84 th Ohio, a three months’ regiment, served nearly the whole of its service attached to the Railroad District in western Ma...
Read more

The Vaunted Enfield Rifle Musket

Image
     The English-made Model 1853 .577 caliber Enfield Rifle Musket was widely regarded as the best infantry arm in the world at the outbreak of the Civil War in April 1861. Favorable international press describing its efficiency in the Crimean War and in suppressing the Indian rebellion led to the widespread desire of American infantrymen (both Federal and Confederate) to be armed with these accurate and well-made arms. The lock plate of this well-worn P1853 Enfield rifle musket produced in 1862 shows the typical markings of a British-made weapon that made it through the Federal blockade.  ( Army of Tennessee Relics ) Enfield-pattern weapons were imported into the states by the tens and hundreds of thousands during the war years; one estimate stated that the Federal government purchased 500,000 while the Confederates purchased another 400,000. The Confederate government dispatched Captain Caleb Huse to Europe in April 1861 to purchase weapons and Huse focused on se...
Read more

In front of Atlanta with the 68th Ohio

Image
  The arrow corps badge of the 17th Army Corps was worn by many members of the 68th Ohio in the latter days of the war.       Private Edward A. Bigelow of Co. F of the 68th Ohio Volunteer Infantry wrote this brief account of the Battle of Atlanta just two days afterwards to his father back home in Henry County, Ohio. The regiment formed a part of Colonel Robert K. Scott's three regiment all-Ohio brigade consisting of the 20th, 68th, and 78th regiments, being designated the Second Brigade of the Third Division of Frank Blair's 17th Army Corps. Bigelow's letter originally appeared in the Napoleon Press newspaper and was copied in the Toledo Daily Commercial which was providential as no known copies exist today of the wartime Napoleon Press.  
Read more

Charging Battery Robinett: An Alabama Soldier Recalls the Vicious Fighting at Corinth

Image
W riting 30 years after the Battle of Corinth, James A. McKinstry of the 42 nd Alabama recalled his experiences storming Battery Robinett with Colonel William P. Rogers of the 2 nd Texas and expressed guilt that it was perhaps his action that brought about the colonel’s demise. “On seeing a line of Federals approaching, and before giving the situation a thought, I immediately raised my gun and fired full into the breast of a Federal sergeant, who was in front of the column, and only a short distance from us.  'Twas then that Captain George Foster shouted, "Cease firing, men! cease firing!" and waved his handkerchief, then I realized the true situation. 'Twas too late! That fatal volley had been turned on our little band from the muzzles of 1,500 muskets. I was still standing just as I was when I fired my last shot, and within a few feet of Colonel Rogers, when a Minie ball went crashing through my left hip and turned me half round; another went tearing through my ...
Read more

Cook & Brother of New Orleans

Image
    The lockplate of a New Orleans-made Cook & Brother Enfield rifle produced in 1862 shows the fine craftsmanship that became the hallmark of the maker throughout the Civil War. Note the stars and bars flag at left, an emblem used on C&B's production throughout the war and the Cook & Brother, N.O. 1862 markings. Earlier production weapons at New Orleans had the flag located just above the maker's name while later weapons produced in Athens, Georgia would have a modified flag and Athens on the plate followed by the serial number.        In the spring of 1861, two English-born businessmen, Ferdinand and Francis Cook of New Orleans, perceived the need for the South to have its own domestic production of firearms and  set out to prove "that rifles could made here as well as in Yankee land or in Europe." The brothers  elected to produce copies of the British Model 1853 .577 caliber Enfield rifle as this was considered the benchmark longarm...
Read more

I Want to See a Battle: A Hoosier at Shiloh

Image
W riting in his diary, Private Manius Buchanan of the 29 th Indiana recalled the eagerness with which his regiment marched towards Savannah, Tennessee with the sounds of the battle of Shiloh ringing in their ears.           “The forced march was kept up until 2 p.m. when we were halted until 4 p.m,” he noted. “The rest was really needed, but the continual question is ‘Why are we stopped here?’ The sound of battle increased in volume and anxiety to be up and doing grows more intense. As I am weak from a late sickness, I am urged to fall to the rear; but no, in common with all, I want to see a battle and fear this will be my only chance.” The regiment would go into action the following afternoon, and of the four neighborhood boys who had enlisted together in Co. B, only Buchanan escaped unscathed. One afternoon's exposure to the horrors of battle was all it took to satisfy this Hoosier's desire to see the elephant. “I wanted to see a battl...
Read more

An Interview with Forrest in May 1864

Image
  “The noise of battle is the only music that ravishes the senses of Forrest.” I t was May 1864. Back east, the Army of Northern Virginia and the Army of the Potomac were locked in the deadly dance of the Overland Campaign while in Georgia, General William Tecumseh Sherman's army squared off against General Joseph E. Johnston and the Army of the Tennessee in the campaign for Atlanta.       Based in relatively quiet northern Mississippi, General Nathan Bedford Forrest bided his time waiting for a Federal advance from Memphis. Earlier in the month, General Samuel Sturgis led a brief campaign into Mississippi but Forrest was sure Sturgis would venture out again. In the meantime, he tried to keep his reorganized command intact despite persistent demands from his superiors that he return the absentees and deserters who inflated his ranks (nearly 1,000 in number) to their original commands.      Around this same time,  an old acquaintance from Me...
Read more