Rashness to Remain Longer: With McLean’s Buckeyes at Chinn Ridge

    For the men of the 75th Ohio, the Second Battle of Bull Run was prefaced by a confusing week of marches and countermarches and on the first day of battle, they weren't engaged at all, enjoying the rare opportunity of watching a battle. Corporal Joseph Harris of Co. C described the experience as "the wicked hissing of 50 shells belched forth from as many cannon on each side, bursting here and there, carried death and destruction in their wake. Volley after volley of musketry continued without intermission nearly all day while the dense clouds of smoke placed before our eyes the stern reality of the raging battle. The 75th, although not actually engaged, was where the shells fell fast and thick but fortunately only one man was wounded that day. " 

    But the following day, August 30th, the 75th Ohio would be tasked with holding a critical piece of ground at Chinn Ridge and Harris would get a belly full of fighting. "To our dismay there appeared to our left regiment after regiment of the enemy in solid column," he wrote. "For some time, our officers were uncertain if it was McDowell’s army or the enemy as at a distance their uniforms appeared as ours. It was stated that they had their uniforms purposely to deceive us. The men insisted on firing on them, and we were soon made aware that it was the enemy by the terrible volleys they poured into us both of bullets and canister."

     The 75th Ohio was attached to Colonel Nathaniel McLean's all-Ohio brigade during the battle consisting of the 25th, 55th, 73rd, and 75th regiments along with Battery K of the 1st Ohio Light Artillery. Corporal Harris's account of Second Bull Run originally saw publication in a September 1862 issue of the Eaton Register. 


Upton’s Hill near Washington, D.C.

September 15, 1862

          Now that the excitement of the week’s battles has quieted down, I thought a short history of the part the 75th Ohio, particularly Co. C, played would not be uninteresting. We marched to the Rapidan, then the Rappahannock, skirmished many days before the Battle of Bull Run but on Wednesday preceding, Sigel’s corps left Warrenton in the direction of Manassas Junction where Jackson was reported to be. About 5 that evening, we came upon a part of the enemy and took several prisoners who were straggling behind. The cannons were placed into position that night and the infantry was also placed in line of battle; the expectation was that there would be an attack during the night or early next morning. But then the enemy was moving toward the old Bull Run battlefield and before the sun arose above the eastern horizon, we were on the move in pursuit.

          We continued until 1 p.m. without stopping even to get our breakfast or dinner when we halted, about faced, and took the backtrack. Our officers said that Pope had gotten in front of the enemy and was driving them back on another road and that we were to go back and take the pike which leads to Washington which we had left in the morning for the purpose of hemming in the enemy on both ends of the road. We marched back about four miles when the order was given to countermarch and again, we were retracing our steps. We marched forward some four or five miles when we turned to the left on a byroad running north almost parallel with the road we came. Skirmishers were deployed, cannonading was heard in front and on Thursday evening the 28th commenced the second battle of Bull Run.

General Nathaniel McLean

          We arrived within a mile of the scene of conflict that evening and the 75th Ohio took its position in support of DeBeck’s battery which fired a few shells. The cannonading was kept up until it became too dark to be effective, but the infantry was engaged till long after darkness came. The morning of the 29th dawned beautifully and with it a renewal of the conflict. The wicked hissing of 50 shells belched forth from as many cannon on each side, bursting here and there, carrying death and destruction in their wake. Volley after volley of musketry continued without intermission nearly all day while the dense clouds of smoke placed before our eyes the stern reality of the raging battle. The day was ours. We had driven them from their positions and held the ground they had occupied in the morning. The 75th, although not actually engaged, was where the shells fell fast and thick but fortunately only one man was wounded that day. We rested on the hard-fought battlefield that night without being disturbed.

    Saturday about noon it was reported that the enemy had received large reinforcements, but it was also reported that a large group of McClellan’s army was coming to reinforce us. Our forces began moving up about 2 p.m. Sigel’s corps was left of center with McLean’s brigade the extreme left of his corps. On our left was McDowell’s corps. About 3, the enemy made their appearance on our right. We were then fronting in that direction. The 75th fired three or four volleys into them which made a terrible havoc in their ranks, and they retreated every man for himself behind a ridge and we saw nothing more in that direction. To our dismay there appeared to our left regiment after regiment of the enemy in solid column. For some time, our officers were uncertain if it was McDowell’s army or the enemy as at a distance their uniforms appeared as ours. It was stated that they had their uniforms purposely to deceive us. The men insisted on firing on them, and we were soon made aware that it was the enemy by the terrible volleys they poured into us both of bullets and canister.

We were not prepared for this. McDowell, who should have met this body of the enemy, fell back without ever firing a gun and the result was our little brigade was left with the alternative of either falling back or engaging the enemy 10 to 1. We chose the latter and although the brigade was woefully mixed up through such a change of circumstances, we actually held the enemy in check for more than an hour in a perfect shower of bullets, grape, and canister and every man for himself. Such desperate valor and veteran coolness amid such confusion is rarely shown against such terrible odds as was exhibited by Colonel McLean’s little brigade that day. The only thing that saved us from being annihilated was that the enemy fired too high and too low, and not because they did not fire often enough, they being in such numbers that their volleys were perfectly deafening. The advantage gained by our thus holding the enemy in check was such that if it had been otherwise, the fortunes of the day would have been far worse.

The 75th Ohio was one of the few Ohio regiments fully equipped with Enfield Rifle Muskets when they entered service in October 1861. 

When it became known that the enemy was trying to flank us on the left, we held them long enough to throw our forces to the left in order to check their further advance and we only left our position when it was rashness to remain longer. Co. C improved on the valor it showed at McDowell; not a man shrinking from the post of danger. Every man regretted the confusion we were thrown into over which we had no control, but to make up for this, it seemed that each one considered it his bound duty to fight the enemy till the bitter end rather than give up our position to a haughty and insulting enemy. At least such was the spirit of Co. C and indomitable bravery was shown by every member. The enemy flanking us on the left with such a large force turned the fortune of the day against us. We were defeated but not routed. The long train of ammunitions and provision wagons and our whole force fell back to Centreville that night and next morning in good order without losing hardly a wagon. On Sunday, men were detailed to bury the dead and gather up the wounded who had been left on the field.

         

Source:

Letter from Corporal Joseph Harris, Co. C, 75th Ohio Volunteer Infantry, Eaton Register (Ohio), September 1862

Comments

Post a Comment

Most Popular Posts

Arming the Buckeyes: Longarms of the Ohio Infantry Regiments

Image
     A common question that comes up in conversation about Civil War Buckeye regiments is "What were they armed with?" We are fortunate in that the state of Ohio kept good records of how the regiments were armed when they went into service, this being especially true for those regiments which went into service in 1861 and 1862. The state adjutant general's reports for 1861 and 1862 have been heavily drawn upon to construct this article, as well as consultation with Phil Spaugy who has done extensive research on how Ohio's troops were armed during the war.      Buckeyes carried a fairly wide variety of weapons into the field, and the below article breaks this down into weapons of both domestic manufacture and imported arms. The early days of the war found the state of Ohio practically bereft of longarms; as an example, when the 1st and 2nd Ohio Volunteer Militia left the state in late April 1861, they left unarmed, being armed at Lancaster, Pennsylvania on t...
Read more

Bullets for the Union: Manufacturing Small Arms Ammunition During the Civil War

Image
       Civil War bullets are perhaps the most common item collected from the era; the two armies expended bullets by the millions during the four years’ conflict and spent or deformed bullets of all shapes and sizes have made fascinating and affordable collectibles since the guns went silent in 1865.       I recently acquired a display piece featuring 35 different types of small arms ammunition used during the Civil War, including everything from a small .28 caliber ball up to a .69 caliber three-ring Minie and it triggered some questions: how did the Federal army obtain its small arms ammunition during the war? Where did the lead come from to make the bullets, and where and how was the ammunition manufactured? This post seeks to answer those questions. A typical .58 caliber 3-ring Minie bullet   “Whenever the blasts of war blow in the ears of men who trade in the implements of destruction, they are apt to experience more joy than the true ...
Read more

Dressing the Rebels: How to Dye Butternut Jeans Cloth

Image
     In the early days of the Civil War,  the Southern states found themselves with an abundance of cotton but a shortage of cloth with which to make army uniforms. The trade in cloth prior to the war had largely been to send raw cotton or wool north to New England (or Great Britain) where it was converted into usable cloth; but now that trade was broken and the Southern states were thrown upon their own resources in their efforts to properly clothe the Confederate army.  This collection of Confederate enlisted men's frock coats and shell jackets gives some indication of the variety of shades of butternut worn during the war. All of them are shades of yellow brown, some heavier on the yellow and some heavier on the brown. The blue used around the collar or as rank insignia indicates that the soldier was in the infantry. Surviving Confederate uniforms are considered rather rare and command quite a healthy price in the collecting market. For an in-depth study of h...
Read more

The Wizard of Oz and the Civil War

Image
T he 1939 film The Wizard of Oz has delighted viewers for 85 years and ranks as a personal favorite, especially during the Halloween season. While watching it with the family the other night, I wondered if there were any connections between the film and the Civil War. Not surprisingly, the answer is yes and those connections touch both the blue and the gray.           Interestingly both “witches” in the film not only had Civil War ancestors but had connections with Civil War soldiers from Ohio. Margaret Hamilton, the “Wicked Witch of the West,” was born in Cleveland, Ohio on December 9, 1902, to attorney Walter Jones Hamilton and his wife Mary Jane Adams; Margaret’s grandfather was Judge Edwin Timothy Hamilton. Judge Hamilton had served as a private in Co. D of the 84 th Ohio Infantry during the summer of 1862. The 84 th Ohio, a three months’ regiment, served nearly the whole of its service attached to the Railroad District in western Ma...
Read more

The Vaunted Enfield Rifle Musket

Image
     The English-made Model 1853 .577 caliber Enfield Rifle Musket was widely regarded as the best infantry arm in the world at the outbreak of the Civil War in April 1861. Favorable international press describing its efficiency in the Crimean War and in suppressing the Indian rebellion led to the widespread desire of American infantrymen (both Federal and Confederate) to be armed with these accurate and well-made arms. The lock plate of this well-worn P1853 Enfield rifle musket produced in 1862 shows the typical markings of a British-made weapon that made it through the Federal blockade.  ( Army of Tennessee Relics ) Enfield-pattern weapons were imported into the states by the tens and hundreds of thousands during the war years; one estimate stated that the Federal government purchased 500,000 while the Confederates purchased another 400,000. The Confederate government dispatched Captain Caleb Huse to Europe in April 1861 to purchase weapons and Huse focused on se...
Read more

In front of Atlanta with the 68th Ohio

Image
  The arrow corps badge of the 17th Army Corps was worn by many members of the 68th Ohio in the latter days of the war.       Private Edward A. Bigelow of Co. F of the 68th Ohio Volunteer Infantry wrote this brief account of the Battle of Atlanta just two days afterwards to his father back home in Henry County, Ohio. The regiment formed a part of Colonel Robert K. Scott's three regiment all-Ohio brigade consisting of the 20th, 68th, and 78th regiments, being designated the Second Brigade of the Third Division of Frank Blair's 17th Army Corps. Bigelow's letter originally appeared in the Napoleon Press newspaper and was copied in the Toledo Daily Commercial which was providential as no known copies exist today of the wartime Napoleon Press.  
Read more

Charging Battery Robinett: An Alabama Soldier Recalls the Vicious Fighting at Corinth

Image
W riting 30 years after the Battle of Corinth, James A. McKinstry of the 42 nd Alabama recalled his experiences storming Battery Robinett with Colonel William P. Rogers of the 2 nd Texas and expressed guilt that it was perhaps his action that brought about the colonel’s demise. “On seeing a line of Federals approaching, and before giving the situation a thought, I immediately raised my gun and fired full into the breast of a Federal sergeant, who was in front of the column, and only a short distance from us.  'Twas then that Captain George Foster shouted, "Cease firing, men! cease firing!" and waved his handkerchief, then I realized the true situation. 'Twas too late! That fatal volley had been turned on our little band from the muzzles of 1,500 muskets. I was still standing just as I was when I fired my last shot, and within a few feet of Colonel Rogers, when a Minie ball went crashing through my left hip and turned me half round; another went tearing through my ...
Read more

Cook & Brother of New Orleans

Image
    The lockplate of a New Orleans-made Cook & Brother Enfield rifle produced in 1862 shows the fine craftsmanship that became the hallmark of the maker throughout the Civil War. Note the stars and bars flag at left, an emblem used on C&B's production throughout the war and the Cook & Brother, N.O. 1862 markings. Earlier production weapons at New Orleans had the flag located just above the maker's name while later weapons produced in Athens, Georgia would have a modified flag and Athens on the plate followed by the serial number.        In the spring of 1861, two English-born businessmen, Ferdinand and Francis Cook of New Orleans, perceived the need for the South to have its own domestic production of firearms and  set out to prove "that rifles could made here as well as in Yankee land or in Europe." The brothers  elected to produce copies of the British Model 1853 .577 caliber Enfield rifle as this was considered the benchmark longarm...
Read more

I Want to See a Battle: A Hoosier at Shiloh

Image
W riting in his diary, Private Manius Buchanan of the 29 th Indiana recalled the eagerness with which his regiment marched towards Savannah, Tennessee with the sounds of the battle of Shiloh ringing in their ears.           “The forced march was kept up until 2 p.m. when we were halted until 4 p.m,” he noted. “The rest was really needed, but the continual question is ‘Why are we stopped here?’ The sound of battle increased in volume and anxiety to be up and doing grows more intense. As I am weak from a late sickness, I am urged to fall to the rear; but no, in common with all, I want to see a battle and fear this will be my only chance.” The regiment would go into action the following afternoon, and of the four neighborhood boys who had enlisted together in Co. B, only Buchanan escaped unscathed. One afternoon's exposure to the horrors of battle was all it took to satisfy this Hoosier's desire to see the elephant. “I wanted to see a battl...
Read more

An Interview with Forrest in May 1864

Image
  “The noise of battle is the only music that ravishes the senses of Forrest.” I t was May 1864. Back east, the Army of Northern Virginia and the Army of the Potomac were locked in the deadly dance of the Overland Campaign while in Georgia, General William Tecumseh Sherman's army squared off against General Joseph E. Johnston and the Army of the Tennessee in the campaign for Atlanta.       Based in relatively quiet northern Mississippi, General Nathan Bedford Forrest bided his time waiting for a Federal advance from Memphis. Earlier in the month, General Samuel Sturgis led a brief campaign into Mississippi but Forrest was sure Sturgis would venture out again. In the meantime, he tried to keep his reorganized command intact despite persistent demands from his superiors that he return the absentees and deserters who inflated his ranks (nearly 1,000 in number) to their original commands.      Around this same time,  an old acquaintance from Me...
Read more