A Glorious Conclusion: the Surrender of Vicksburg
To mark my 100th blog post
regarding the Civil War, I wanted to put something together regarding one of
the most poignant events of the war, the surrender of Vicksburg,
Mississippi on July 4, 1863. Widely regarded (with Gettysburg) as the turning
point of the conflict, many of the veterans of both Grant’s and Pemberton’s armies
penned memoirs and reminiscences of the events leading up to the surrender. For
this post, I’d like to share the memories of a few soldiers of the 32nd
Ohio who were eyewitnesses to the negotiations and eventual surrender of the
city, interspersed with accounts from Generals Grant and Pemberton.
Sergeant Henry
G. Lehmann Co. H, 32nd Ohio had just finished some clerical work for
Colonel Benjamin Potts and was about to commence sharpshooting on the Rebels
when he spied two Rebel horsemen approaching with a white flag. “Turning to the
colonel, I shouted, ‘There comes a white flag!’ He replied, ‘Order the men to
cease firing.’ I at once jumped over our works, running and walking rapidly,
met the two officers bearing the white flag near an oak tree which was about
halfway between our line and that of the Rebels. One of the officers said to
me, ‘Where is the commanding officer of this line of works?’ I turned pointing
to where I had just left the colonel when I saw that he was coming halfway
between where we then were and our works and replied, ‘There he comes now.’ By
the time the colonel came to us, a great number of our boys who had sprung over
our works now came up. The colonel, noticing this, ordered all of us to our
places in the trenches. The Rebel officers were taken charge of by the officer
of the day (Captain William M. Morris, Co. D, 32nd O.V.I.), blindfolded, and
conducted to General Andrew J. Smith’s headquarters. White flags appeared upon
the Rebel works in our front and hostilities ceased. The Rebel officers who
bore the white flag were General John S. Bowen, a division commander, and
Colonel L.M. Montgomery of Pemberton’s staff.”
General
Pemberton employed a bit of clever strategery in sending General Bowen on this
mission. Bowen, a former Missouri neighbor of General Grant, was dying of
dysentery and perhaps it was hoped that the sight of an old friend in obvious
physical distress would soften Grant’s hand against the Confederates.
Regardless, General Bowen bore the following dispatch from General Pemberton
addressed to General Grant: “I have the honor to propose to you an armistice of
x hours with a view to arrange terms of capitulation of Vicksburg. To this end,
if agreeable to you, I will appoint three commissioners to meet a like number,
to be named by yourself, at such place and hour today as you may find
convenient. I make this proposition to save further effusion of blood, which
must otherwise be shed to a frightful extent, feeling myself fully able to maintain
my position for a yet indefinite period. This communication will be handed to
you under flag of truce by Major General John S. Bowen.”
It didn’t work. Grant refused to see Bowen,
leaving his old neighbor cooling his heels at Jackson’s headquarters tent. He wrote a note back to Pemberton stating that
his only terms called for the unconditional surrender of Vicksburg and given
that those were the only terms he was interested in discussing, he rejected
Pemberton’s proposal to appoint commissioners to settle the question. He
praised the “endurance and courage” of Pemberton’s army and assured the
Pennsylvania-born commander that all “would be treated with all the respect due
to prisoners of war.” However, he sent a verbal message that said that he would
agree to meet directly with Pemberton to discuss the issue. Bowen returned to
Confederate lines with Grant’s reply, and as Pemberton stated “at the joint
request of my four division commanders” [Bowen, Carter Stevenson, John Forney,
and Martin L. Smith] he agreed to meet with Grant.
Lehmann continues his narrative: “At 3
o’clock in the afternoon, General Ulysses S. Grant and Generals Edward O. Ord, James
B. McPherson, John A. Logan, Andrew J. Smith, and their staff officers came
riding through our lines to the oak tree and were there met by General John C. Pemberton
and the two officers who bore the white flag in the morning. [A quick note
about this oak tree from Grant’s Memoirs:
“Our place of meeting was on a hillside within a few hundred feet of the Rebel
lines. Nearby stood a stunted oak tree which was made historical by the event.
It was but a short time before the last vestige of its body, root, and limb had
disappeared, the fragments taken as trophies.”] This meeting was nearly
opposite the right of the regiment in plain view and close enough I could
almost hear the conversation going on. After introductions and handshaking
Grant and Pemberton withdrew a little to one side on the slope next to the
enemy, lighted cigars, and entered into a conference. Presently Grant and
Pemberton arose, and the conference was ended. The white flags still remained
upon the Rebel works and hostilities ceased to await the result of the
correspondence with reference to acceptance of the terms offered by General
Grant.”
From a
distance, the conference may have appeared neat and tidy, but it was a tense
meeting that had a visibly upset Pemberton running headlong into a triumphant
and stubborn Grant. Lehmann’s statement that he saw Grant and Pemberton go
aside in a private conference was correct: what they discussed was not the
surrender terms, however. They foisted that messy job on their trusted aides:
Grant chose Generals McPherson and A.J. Smith while Pemberton again called upon
Bowen and Colonel Montgomery to work out the details. Pemberton wrote that he
and Grant spent their time “conversing only upon topics that had no relation to
the important subject that brought us together.” After some discussion, the
group of “commissioners” rejoined Grant and Pemberton with a proposal that
apparently Grant rejected initially, but agreed to send over his own proposal
later that evening. The terms Grant proposed were largely those assembled by
the “commissioners,” and these were accepted by Pemberton who ordered the
surrender of the Confederate garrison on July 4, 1863.
Major General U.S. Grant |
Sergeant Lehmann described the way the
Confederates surrendered the city of July 4th. “Along toward morning, word had
come to us in the trenches that if the terms offered by General Grant were
accepted, the ‘Johnnies’ would march outside their lines at 9 A.M., stack arms
in front of their works, and march back inside as prisoners of war. At last we
saw the head of their columns coming and soon they had marched outside, stacked
their guns, and placed their flags upon the gun stacks and returned inside
their works as prisoners. To us it was a glorious sight and we felt that our
long and weary marches through rain, mud, and sunshine, hard fighting,
ceaseless watching by day and by night, exposure to disease and death, were now
at an end.”
Sergeant William Pitt Chambers of Co. B, 46th
Mississippi was among the humiliated Confederate troops who marched out and
stacked arms. He remembered “at an early hour we were informed that terms of
capitulation had been agreed upon, and about 10 a.m. we performed the
humiliating task of marching in front of our works and stacking arms in full
view of the enemy, and under the direction of a Federal officer. Some of us
wept as we did this for we realized that this was the end of all our
sacrifices. For this ignoble ending we had fought, had watched, had hungered,
and shed our blood, and many a brave comrade had gone to an untimely grave. To
intensify the humiliation of the men was the suspicion, to many it was a
conviction that Pemberton had been false to the flag under which he fought.”
General Pemberton surrendered 2,166 officers,
27,230 men, 172 cannons, and roughly 60,000 stands of small arms. He also
sacrificed his standing in the Confederacy, one historian going so far to state
that Pemberton became the most reviled man in Confederate gray due to the
widespread impression that, as Chambers states above, the Northern-born
Pemberton had purposely betrayed the South by surrendering Vicksburg.
Private William M. McLain of Co. B, 32nd
Ohio summed up his feelings about the significance of Vicksburg in a letter
written to the Urbana Citizen &
Gazette on July 4, 1863. “I doubt not but you have had a good time today,
but I’ll guarantee that not one heart among you throbbed more joyously than
mine when I saw the little white flags stuck on all the forts and the graybacks
crawling out to stack arms. I had seen some such a sight once before but then
they surrounded me and their significance included me. [McLain is referring to
the surrender of Harper’s Ferry the previous September in which the 32nd
Ohio, along with the entire Federal garrison, was surrendered to the
Confederates.] Now like the Irish officer at Champion Hills who surrounded and
captured 20 Rebels (see St. Louis
Republican), I surrounded them, and their significance pointed me to a rift
in the war clouds. I seemed to see in them the beginning of the end, and need I
say that I felt proud of the gallant Grant, proud of the fighting Jack Logan,
proud (a little) of myself, proud of every private in the Army of the
Tennessee, proud of the noble dead who are ‘sleeping sweetly sleeping till the
final reveille,’ in the now quiet valleys that we so lately filled, proud that
they fell defending a land worthy of their bravest defense. This is (in homely
but expressive terms) the biggest 4th of July that I have ever spent.”
References:
Battles and Leaders
of the Civil War, Vol. III
Baumgartner, Richard A., editor. Blood & Sacrifice: The Civil War Journal of a Confederate Soldier.
[Sergeant William Pitt Chambers] Huntingdon: Blue Acorn Press, 1994
Grant, Ulysses S. Personal
Memoirs of U.S. Grant, New York: Penguin Books, 1999
Lehmann, Henry G. Reminiscences
of a Soldier, 1861-65. Np, nd
McLain, William M., Urbana
Citizen & Gazette, July 23, 1863, pg. 2
Comments
Post a Comment