A Dutchman at Belmont

The Battle of Belmont, Missouri is perhaps best remembered as being General Ulysses S. Grant’s first battle in the Civil War, a battle devoid of strategic intention, an engagement which stemmed from Grant’s desire “to do something” against the growing Confederate presence in Columbus, Kentucky. “I did not see how I could maintain discipline or retain the confidence of my command if we should return to Cairo without an effort to do something,” he recalled in his Memoirs. Gathering a force totaling a little over 3,000 men and escorted by a pair of gunboats, Grant set out from Cairo aboard steamboats intending to give the Rebs a sharp rap on the nose.

The general had received intelligence that indicated that the Confederates had crossed a small force over the Mississippi from Columbus to Belmont, Missouri. Grant’s idea was to swoop down on this Confederate detachment, rough it up, tear up its camps, then high tail it back to the steamboats before the larger Confederate force at Columbus had time to react. Things didn’t work out according to plan, and the Confederates, after initially being driven out of their camps, ended up driving Grant’s force back to the boats with a loss of nearly 500 Federals. But Grant’s men gave a good account of themselves, inflicting 642 casualties. The battle was ultimately indecisive and all things considered, a Confederate victory. But it showed that Grant was a commander who would fight.

For Otho Klemm, Belmont marked his first battle in the Civil War, too. The German-born Klemm moved from Toledo, Ohio to Chicago, Illinois just before the war and joined Battery B of the 1st Illinois Light Artillery on July 25, 1861. He served a three-year term of enlistment with the battery, mustering out July 23, 1864. This battery was known by a number of names but at this time was called Taylor’s Battery as it was led by Captain Ezra Taylor. Taylor’s Battery served in the Army of the Tennessee throughout the war, seeing action at Belmont, Fort Donelson, Shiloh, and numerous others engagements throughout the western theater. At Belmont, the battery was attached to Brigadier General John McClernand’s First Brigade which consisted of the 27th Illinois, 30th Illinois, 31st Illinois, two companies of Illinois cavalry, and Taylor’s battery.

Klemm’s account appeared in the November 30, 1861 issue of the Daily Toledo Herald & Times on page two.


Battle of Belmont, Missouri, November 7, 1861

Bird’s Point, Mo., Nov. 10, 1861
My Dear Theo,      
Your kind favor of the 4th, I just received with pleasure, the day we left this point for the never to be forgotten battle of Belmont.  This is the first opportunity I have had to relieve your anxiety in regard to our safety. It is quite difficult for me to fix my mind on anything for the present than that eventful day November 7, 1861.  I will give you my description of the bloodiest battle that has ever been fought in Missouri!

On the evening of the 6th we embarked with our whole battery, consisting of six pieces on the steamer Chancellor, there were three other boats, which had about 3,500 Infantry from here and Cairo.  We all left under great cheering and all of us aching for a fight.  We had it and “more too.”

We disembarked the next morning at 7 o’clock on the Missouri side near Belmont, under the fire of the enemy’s heavy guns from the fortifications of Columbus across the river and a masked battery at the same place, which was very well answered by our two gunboats.  About 9 o’clock all the troops were in sight of the Rebels, and then commenced one of the bloodiest battles I ever heard of. The Rebels had about 500 men and two batteries of artillery, one being the celebrated Watson Light Artillery of New Orleans.  Two of our pieces were firing upon the guns of the enemy as fast as possible, while the other four threw a perfect hail of canister, shells and spherical case, which must have done an awful execution, as it tore up the ranks of Infantry and killed about all the cannoneers at their guns.  One fellow, we found hammer and spike in hand, ready to spike his gun.  They fought most desperately to gain a victory, but our infantry and artillery was a little too much for them to stand.
Captain Ezra Taylor
Battery B, 1st Illinois Light Artillery

After cleaning out the masked battery of rifled guns and Watson’s battery, we advanced slowly and steadily on to their camp, which was furnished and fixed up far better than any camp in out army, they appeared to have plenty of gold and silver.  I understood the regiments we fought, were the flower of [General Albert S.] Johnston’s army, which may account for their being so much superior in looks and arms.--  We captured two cannons, a number of muskets and a quantity of Maynard and Enfield rifles and some awful looking knives, which gave us a good chance to see for ourselves.

We kept driving them towards the river and were almost sure the day was ours, when they received reinforcements from Columbus, which gave them new courage and our exhausted troops were too tired to make a bold stand, besides the most of them had shot away all their ammunition.  To show you, how we fought; each Infantry man received forty rounds and we had when we started 1,100 rounds and only brought about 300, you can have an idea, what shooting was done on our side not speaking of the enemy’s heavy guns, which threw 120-lb. slugs, made to sink our gunboats.  When they fired, the ground fairly trembled; they also used chain shot, which tore down trees two feet in diameter, like pipe stems.  The first introduction I had was a rail fence torn down close by me and then the shell burst and cut off a limb of a big tree 60 feet from the fence.  The firing was kept up for 4½ hours without intermission and the noise sounded like heavy thunder.

Now for the retreat- it beggars all description.  We drew of two of the enemy’s guns, with our two limbers, leaving caissons with the enemy.  We tried to protect the rear with our six guns as well as we could.  Twice I was almost forced to stop clear behind, and made up my mind I would stay with the “Secesh” but fortunately for me, our guns were ordered to make another stand about a mile and a half from the battle field, which gave me a chance to catch up and ride.  I was very thankful; you may be assured.

It was very hard to see the poor wounded fellows lying along the road, some with their arms, others with their legs shot off and many with their heads all crushed in, without being able to give them any assistance.  One poor fellow begged to be killed, as he was suffering the most excruciating pain, one of our men stepped up to him and pierced him through the heart.  I gave one man a drink of water, who had a ball pass through his shoulder, then through his jaw and out by the cheekbone, you can see by that the enemy had very fine arms.
 
General Ulysses S. Grant
After traveling on the retreat three miles through woods, which were the means of saving a large number from being killed we came up to our boats, which I can assure you we hailed with delight.  We jerked our guns aboard as fast as possible and had everything aboard except one baggage wagon, when the cry came the Secesh are down on us.  You should have seen the excitement on the boats; we cut the rope and made off the shore as quick as possible.  We had just shoved off when then commenced to fire on us and we received the fire of about 100 Infantry and the way the glass and splinters flew, was a caution.  Our gunboats then opened upon them, as well as three of our guns aboard the boat and the way they were slaughtered was awful.  As we understood the next day, when our boat returned, which went down to bring our wounded and bury our dead.  Our men saw the bodies piled in some places four deep.  The Rebels were awful crusty and hardly treated our men civilly.

They said they buried about 500 men that day and were not near done.  They refused to exchange prisoners.  I understood they intended to send them to New Orleans, as they expected another attack on Belmont and Columbus very soon.  The Rebels sent word they would like to meet our battery on friendly terms and swore dire vengeance against us on the battlefield and they would never rest until they broke us up.  Our field officers praised us very highly and acknowledged that had it not been for us many more would never have returned.  Last night we received three cheers from the whole brigades which I assure you this quite an honor.  The greatest wonder is that only three of our men were wounded- considering we were exposed to the hottest firing for 4 ½ hours. They all say our battery is immortalized –as for the Infantry they fairly worship us and have given us the name of “Taylor’s devils.”  I hope, that the next time we have an engagement we will come out as sound as this.

Affectionately,
Otho Klemm

Comments

Post a Comment

Most Popular Posts

Arming the Buckeyes: Longarms of the Ohio Infantry Regiments

Image
     A common question that comes up in conversation about Civil War Buckeye regiments is "What were they armed with?" We are fortunate in that the state of Ohio kept good records of how the regiments were armed when they went into service, this being especially true for those regiments which went into service in 1861 and 1862. The state adjutant general's reports for 1861 and 1862 have been heavily drawn upon to construct this article, as well as consultation with Phil Spaugy who has done extensive research on how Ohio's troops were armed during the war.      Buckeyes carried a fairly wide variety of weapons into the field, and the below article breaks this down into weapons of both domestic manufacture and imported arms. The early days of the war found the state of Ohio practically bereft of longarms; as an example, when the 1st and 2nd Ohio Volunteer Militia left the state in late April 1861, they left unarmed, being armed at Lancaster, Pennsylvania on their way to
Read more

Dressing the Rebels: How to Dye Butternut Jeans Cloth

Image
     In the early days of the Civil War,  the Southern states found themselves with an abundance of cotton but a shortage of cloth with which to make army uniforms. The trade in cloth prior to the war had largely been to send raw cotton or wool north to New England (or Great Britain) where it was converted into usable cloth; but now that trade was broken and the Southern states were thrown upon their own resources in their efforts to properly clothe the Confederate army.  This collection of Confederate enlisted men's frock coats and shell jackets gives some indication of the variety of shades of butternut worn during the war. All of them are shades of yellow brown, some heavier on the yellow and some heavier on the brown. The blue used around the collar or as rank insignia indicates that the soldier was in the infantry. Surviving Confederate uniforms are considered rather rare and command quite a healthy price in the collecting market. For an in-depth study of how Confederate jacke
Read more

Bullets for the Union: Manufacturing Small Arms Ammunition During the Civil War

Image
       Civil War bullets are perhaps the most common item collected from the era; the two armies expended bullets by the millions during the four years’ conflict and spent or deformed bullets of all shapes and sizes have made fascinating and affordable collectibles since the guns went silent in 1865.       I recently acquired a display piece featuring 35 different types of small arms ammunition used during the Civil War, including everything from a small .28 caliber ball up to a .69 caliber three-ring Minie and it triggered some questions: how did the Federal army obtain its small arms ammunition during the war? Where did the lead come from to make the bullets, and where and how was the ammunition manufactured? This post seeks to answer those questions. A typical .58 caliber 3-ring Minie bullet   “Whenever the blasts of war blow in the ears of men who trade in the implements of destruction, they are apt to experience more joy than the true warrior, for then comes the harvest of gain.
Read more

The Cannons are Now Silent: The Field of Death of Tupelo

Image
       The smoke of battle had drifted away from the battlefield at Tupelo, Mississippi on the hot afternoon of July 14, 1864, but the carnage of war lay spread across the open fields. “Scattered at intervals over the field of a few yards are dull gray blotches half shaded by grass,” an officer from the 7 th Minnesota Infantry recorded. “These are the Rebel dead. They have fought their last battle and lie generally in attitudes of rest; some of them look as if they had welcomed death. On the faces of two is imprinted a smile. One is a boy of 16 with delicate features, almost girlish in their beauty. His last gaze seems to have been directed toward his hand on the forefinger of which was a ring. A circle of purer white indicates its place; the ring was carried off as a trophy of the field.” The following account of the Battles of Tupelo and Old Town Creek was written by an unknown officer of the 7 th Minnesota Infantry, his account appearing in the August 5 th 1864 edition of the
Read more

The Vaunted Enfield Rifle Musket

Image
     The English-made Model 1853 .577 caliber Enfield Rifle Musket was widely regarded as the best infantry arm in the world at the outbreak of the Civil War in April 1861. Favorable international press describing its efficiency in the Crimean War and in suppressing the Indian rebellion led to the widespread desire of American infantrymen (both Federal and Confederate) to be armed with these accurate and well-made arms. The lock plate of this well-worn P1853 Enfield rifle musket produced in 1862 shows the typical markings of a British-made weapon that made it through the Federal blockade.  ( Army of Tennessee Relics ) Enfield-pattern weapons were imported into the states by the tens and hundreds of thousands during the war years; one estimate stated that the Federal government purchased 500,000 while the Confederates purchased another 400,000. The Confederate government dispatched Captain Caleb Huse to Europe in April 1861 to purchase weapons and Huse focused on securing all the Enfi
Read more

Straw Already Threshed: Sherman on Shiloh

Image
  W illiam Tecumseh Sherman was enjoying retired life in New York City when just before Christmas in 1889 he was presented with an article written by John Cockerill, a former drummer boy in the 24 th Ohio who was visiting his father Colonel Joseph Cockerill of the 70 th Ohio of Sherman’s division when the Battle of Shiloh began. Cockerill’s article, originally published in the New York Journalist and later featured in the January 1893 issue of Blue & Gray Magazine, Sherman later pronounced as “the best war story ever written” and the truest account of Shiloh.           On New Year’s Day 1890, General Sherman composed the following letter to his friend Marshall P. Wilder thanking him for sending along Cockerill’s article and giving his own explanation of Shiloh. “This to me is straw already threshed for we have fought this battle on paper several times, a much more agreeable task than to fight with bullets,” he concluded. “When in England some years ago I was gratified to liste
Read more

Federal Arms in the Stones River Campaign

Image
  T he following list, constructed after many years of research, lists unit by unit which type of weapons were carried by the Army of the Cumberland during the Stones River campaign. A number of sources were consulted including state ordnance reports, Federal quarterly ordnance reports (thank you Research Arsenal ), Ken Baumann’s Arming the Suckers, regimental histories and memoirs, captured ordnance reports, and consultation with knowledgeable experts in the field of firearms. Some of this information has been shared on the blog before in “ Rosy’s Heavy Metal: Artillery of the Army of the Cumberland ” or “ Shoulder Arms: How Sheridan’s and Davis’s Divisions Were Armed at Stones River ” but this is the first time the army as a whole has been presented. The overall conclusion I drew from looking at this data is that the Army of the Cumberland in December 1862 was an organization in the midst of transformation as far as arms. Many of the regiments still retained their original issue
Read more

Federal Arms in the Chickamauga Campaign

Image
T he ordnance returns of the Army of the Cumberland at the end of September 1863 show the results of a transformational year in weaponry. Since taking command of the army at the end of October 1862, General William S. Rosecrans had repeatedly pestered the War Department to supply his regiments with better firearms both to improve the command’s efficiency as well as expand its striking power. The results speak for themselves: for the infantrymen at the end of September 1863, 90% of them now carried Class I long arms (36,058 out of 39,959), 8.3% carried Class II arms, and a mere 1.5% carried Class III weapons. Most of the foreign-made weapons (except Enfields) were gone, and by and large the army had settled on a single common .58 caliber ammunition, although a few .54 caliber and .69 caliber weapons remained within the ranks. The English-made Enfield rifle musket was by far the most common arm, carried by 56% of the men while the second-most common arm was the .58 caliber M1861 Spring
Read more

Sergeant Major John H. Wilson of the 54th Massachusetts Volunteers

Image
A long the northern bank of the Maumee River in a quiet cemetery rests the remains of one of the heroes of the Civil War, Sergeant Major John H. Wilson of the 54th Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry. Sergeant Major John H. Wilson had this photo made in June 1864, proudly displaying both his newly won sergeant major stripes upon his shoulders and the brass regimental number "54" on his kepi.      John H. Wilson was born a free man February 1, 1840 in Cincinnati, Ohio. By the time of the Civil War, he was working aboard Ohio River steamboats as a painter. No doubt he witnessed the arrival of dozens of vessels carrying wounded back from the Southern battlefields of Shiloh and Stones River during his time on the river. Learning in the spring of 1863 that Massachusetts was raising a regiment of Negro soldiers, Wilson traveled east and enlisted in Company G, 54 th Massachusetts on April 16, 1863 at Readville, Massachusetts. The company descriptive book lists him as 5' 8”
Read more

In front of Atlanta with the 68th Ohio

Image
  The arrow corps badge of the 17th Army Corps was worn by many members of the 68th Ohio in the latter days of the war.       Private Edward A. Bigelow of Co. F of the 68th Ohio Volunteer Infantry wrote this brief account of the Battle of Atlanta just two days afterwards to his father back home in Henry County, Ohio. The regiment formed a part of Colonel Robert K. Scott's three regiment all-Ohio brigade consisting of the 20th, 68th, and 78th regiments, being designated the Second Brigade of the Third Division of Frank Blair's 17th Army Corps. Bigelow's letter originally appeared in the Napoleon Press newspaper and was copied in the Toledo Daily Commercial which was providential as no known copies exist today of the wartime Napoleon Press.  
Read more