Running the Gauntlet: the 57th Ohio at the Battle of Atlanta

The fight for Degress' battery at the Battle of Atlanta on July 22, 1864 marks one of the most poignant moments of that hard-fought battle. A desperate charge on the part of the Confederates swirled around the guns and forced back two brigades of General Morgan L. Smith's division of the 15th Army Corps. Among those troops was First Lieutenant James Dixon of the 57th Ohio who was right in the middle of the fight for the battery, and recalled some of the details of the hand-to-hand fight that ensued. "A Rebel officer with a red sash jumped upon the rocks and demanded the surrender of a lieutenant working the battery," he wrote. "The lieutenant rushed towards him with sword drawn, intending to strike him, but was met by a Minie ball from the gun of a Rebel soldier and fell dead by the works. A Rebel attempted to spike one of the guns and Bill Gibson of Co. D knocked him down with the butt of his musket. There was a general row. Bullets were flying in every direction. When the boys shot, they were as apt to kill friend as foe."

Dixon's account of Atlanta was originally published in a Bellefontaine, Ohio newspaper in August 1864. 

Knowing that a few words concerning the 57th O.V.V.I. will be interesting to those of the readers of your paper who have friends or relatives, or both, in the regiment and matters for once being pretty quiet in our front, I take the responsibility of writing a few lines for their satisfaction. 

15th Army Corps badge as worn by members of the 57th O.V.V.I. during the Atlanta campaign. The story of how the corps badge was devised goes back to the meeting of the troops of the Army of the Tennessee with those of the 11th and 12th Corps of the Army of the Potomac. Upon being asked why all of the AoP men had stars and crescent moons on their headgear, the inquirer was told that those devices were corps badges. The Army of Tennessee vet supposedly tapped his cartridge box and said "This is the only corps badge I've ever needed." Without a doubt, the 15th Army Corps had some of the hardest fighting units in the western army and the Battle of Atlanta proved to be the tightest spot they were in during the campaign. 

          Early in the morning of July 22nd the pickets reported “no enemy visible in our front.”  General Morgan L. Smith, our division commander ordered his command into line, and calling for his horse, mounted it, remarking at the time that there was a “race for Atlanta.”  The skirmish line was ordered forward and the troops followed by the flank along the road.  We had not marched more than a quarter of a mile, when two or three 12-pound shells whizzed by us, which, by the direction they came, satisfied us they were of Confederate origin, and were unmistakable evidence that there were yet a few rebellious individuals in that vicinity.  We went up to the works which the enemy had evacuated during the night, and five or six regiments of our division were deployed along them, the others lying a few rods in the rear, in reserve. 

The capture of DeGress' battery at Atlanta on the afternoon of July 22, 1864. The 57th Ohio was right in the thick of the fight for the guns. 

          Our brigade was on the south side of the railroad and the Second Brigade on the north side.  The skirmishers, who had advanced half a mile in front of the works, became engaged with the enemy's pickets, and the 111th Illinois Volunteers was sent out to their support.  An hour or two later Captain George McClure was sent out with 30 men as a support.  The Pioneer Corps came up and the boys went to work attacking the Rebel works, which were of little account to us as they faced the wrong way.  At about 10 a.m., the enemy pounced furiously upon the 16th and 17th corps.  The 16th corps was on the extreme left of our line, and its left rested at Decatur, three miles in the rear of where we were.  It had an open field fight.  The 17th corps, which was between the 16th and ours, occupied the works abandoned by the enemy.  It seems from what I can learn that there was a gap between the 16th and 17th corps, through which the enemy passed and flanked around in the rear of the 17th corps. 

General Giles A. Smith

General Giles A. Smith, our old brigade commander, who was assigned to, and had taken command of a division in the 17th corps a day before the battle, came riding up to our regiment the day after the fight, and we flocked around him, glad to see the hero safe (we had heard that he was killed) and to hear what he had to say.  He told us that his division jumped the works at least six times-that they would drive the enemy out of gunshot range on one side, climb the works, and give them a turn on the other.  Said they would try to close in on him on both sides at once; but on account of the bad roads and inequalities of the ground they could not do it.

          While the fight was going on at the left, all the reserve regiments of our corps were sent there.  At half past 12 p.m., the fight had about ceased and the cheer after cheer that went up from our boys proclaimed them to be the victors.  The enemy shelled our boys so they passed through an open field on their way to reinforce the left, and of course knew that the line was weak, and I suppose Hood thought, “now is my chance.”  At 1 p.m. the pickets in front of our division saw two battle lines approaching, and gradually fell back, followed by the enemy’s skirmishers.  Captain McClure formed his men in the rear of the 111th Illinois, which had dug a rifle trench.  When the Rebels came within short range the boys poured a withering fire into them, and repulsed them in front, but as there were no troops on either side of the 111th, that regiment was flanked on the right and left.  Its commander ordered the men to fall back to the main line, which they did the best way they could, every man for himself, and Hood’s old corps for them all.  Many were shot down and many more were captured.  Ten of the boys of our company failed to get in and were probably taken prisoner.  I do not think any of them were killed, as we were over the ground the next morning and did not recognize any of the dead as having belonged to our company.

Captain George McClure, Co. A

          On came the Rebels and our division, the Second, the Fourth and part of the First, were soon pouring a terrible fire into them.  There is a deep cut in the railroad where it passes through the line of works.  There were two guns of Battery A, 1st Illinois Artillery, between the right of our regiment and the railroad, and four guns of the same battery on the north side between the 47th Ohio and the railroad-the battery and railroad occupying eight or ten rods of our front.  We repulsed the Rebels in front of our regiment, but they poured through the deep cut, and got over the works on the north side of the railroad between the guns.  If we had had a few more men-a company or two to guard the railroad cut, and a few placed between the guns, matters would have stood quite differently. 

As it was the enemy poured through the cut and over the works at the guns by hundreds, and the first thing we knew they were firing down our lines and into our backs. Affairs for a while were quite exciting-Battery A boys stood by their guns and continued firing until there were about as many Rebels as Yankees around them.  A Rebel officer with a red sash jumped upon the works and demanded the surrender of a lieutenant working the battery.  The lieutenant rushed towards him with sword drawn, intending to strike him, but was met by a Minie ball from the gun of a Rebel soldier, and fell dead by the works.

          A Rebel attempted to spike one of the guns, and Bill Gibson, of Co. D, knocked him down with the butt of his musket.  There was a general row. Bullets were flying in every direction.  When our boys shot they were as apt to kill friend as foe.  Three of the boys of our company were here killed dead and lay within a few steps of each other-Sergeant Wilson Wiser; privates Thomas Parrish and Abraham Harris; the two first veterans—three were mortally wounded-William Timbers, William Kenney and James Martin-all veterans and all now dead; two were badly wounded, John Elstan and George W. Martin-and one severely, Joseph Slusser.  “Surrender!” was the war cry of every Rebel soldier, and a great many of our men did surrender, but the most of us ran the gauntlet, leaving Batteries A and H in the enemy’s hands, and got to the works we had left that morning, where we reformed as well as we could.  The 116th and 127th Illinois, and the 6th Missouri of our brigade, at this time came up from Decatur (where they had gone to reinforce the 16th corps, but got there too late to take part in the fight.)  We were ordered to retake the works.

One of the 83 men of the 57th Ohio who were captured during the Battle of Atlanta on July 22nd was Captain Alvah Stone Skilton of Co. I. "The enemy was able to get possession of part of Battery A of the 1st Illinois Light Artillery," he wrote. "They were soon able to form a line of battle in the rear of the regiment and owing to our position in the line, many men of Co. I were taken prisoner including Captain John Underwood and myself. We were sent to Atlanta to the Provost Marshal's office, registered, and marched to East Point at about 11 p.m. Nearly all of my company was taken with me as well as a number from Co. H, 83 men in all captured from the 57th O.V.V.I."

          Part of the First Division, which occupied the works on the right or ours had not yet been engaged.  They changed front to the left and swept down on the inside of the works, while we charged directly in front.  After considerable charging and rough and tumble fighting we were successful—respecting the works—all of Battery H’s guns and two of Battery A’s, the enemy getting away with the other four on the north side of the rail road.  And thus the fighting on that day ended-dear enough for our small company-six are now dead, three in the hospital wounded and 17 missing.  We miss them all.  To the relatives of the dead, we can but extend our heart-felt sympathies.  “I know that my wound is mortal and that I am going to die,” said James Martin to one of the boys, a short time before he died, “but,” he added, “I die in a good cause.”  Yes, he died in a good cause, and that should be a great satisfaction to those that have husbands, sons, or brothers, to fall in this war, to know that they fell while battling for their country’s very existence.

          I was at the hospital on the 27th and saw John Elstan, Joseph Slusser, and George Martin.  Joseph was shot in the shoulder and was walking around—guess he thinks he has a “soft thing,” as his time will be out by the time he is ready for duty.  John was shot twice, once through the right arm, and once through the side, his arm was amputated, and he had to keep his bed, but if one was to judge by his continence and conversation whether there was anything the matter with him or not, the decision would be that he was “playing off.”  Little George was shot through the side and it was thought he would hardly get well, but I hear today that he is improving rapidly.

Captain John Underwood of Co. C was also captured at Atlanta


Comments

Post a Comment

Most Popular Posts

Arming the Buckeyes: Longarms of the Ohio Infantry Regiments

Image
     A common question that comes up in conversation about Civil War Buckeye regiments is "What were they armed with?" We are fortunate in that the state of Ohio kept good records of how the regiments were armed when they went into service, this being especially true for those regiments which went into service in 1861 and 1862. The state adjutant general's reports for 1861 and 1862 have been heavily drawn upon to construct this article, as well as consultation with Phil Spaugy who has done extensive research on how Ohio's troops were armed during the war.      Buckeyes carried a fairly wide variety of weapons into the field, and the below article breaks this down into weapons of both domestic manufacture and imported arms. The early days of the war found the state of Ohio practically bereft of longarms; as an example, when the 1st and 2nd Ohio Volunteer Militia left the state in late April 1861, they left unarmed, being armed at Lancaster, Pennsylvania on t...
Read more

Bullets for the Union: Manufacturing Small Arms Ammunition During the Civil War

Image
       Civil War bullets are perhaps the most common item collected from the era; the two armies expended bullets by the millions during the four years’ conflict and spent or deformed bullets of all shapes and sizes have made fascinating and affordable collectibles since the guns went silent in 1865.       I recently acquired a display piece featuring 35 different types of small arms ammunition used during the Civil War, including everything from a small .28 caliber ball up to a .69 caliber three-ring Minie and it triggered some questions: how did the Federal army obtain its small arms ammunition during the war? Where did the lead come from to make the bullets, and where and how was the ammunition manufactured? This post seeks to answer those questions. A typical .58 caliber 3-ring Minie bullet   “Whenever the blasts of war blow in the ears of men who trade in the implements of destruction, they are apt to experience more joy than the true ...
Read more

Dressing the Rebels: How to Dye Butternut Jeans Cloth

Image
     In the early days of the Civil War,  the Southern states found themselves with an abundance of cotton but a shortage of cloth with which to make army uniforms. The trade in cloth prior to the war had largely been to send raw cotton or wool north to New England (or Great Britain) where it was converted into usable cloth; but now that trade was broken and the Southern states were thrown upon their own resources in their efforts to properly clothe the Confederate army.  This collection of Confederate enlisted men's frock coats and shell jackets gives some indication of the variety of shades of butternut worn during the war. All of them are shades of yellow brown, some heavier on the yellow and some heavier on the brown. The blue used around the collar or as rank insignia indicates that the soldier was in the infantry. Surviving Confederate uniforms are considered rather rare and command quite a healthy price in the collecting market. For an in-depth study of h...
Read more

The Wizard of Oz and the Civil War

Image
T he 1939 film The Wizard of Oz has delighted viewers for 85 years and ranks as a personal favorite, especially during the Halloween season. While watching it with the family the other night, I wondered if there were any connections between the film and the Civil War. Not surprisingly, the answer is yes and those connections touch both the blue and the gray.           Interestingly both “witches” in the film not only had Civil War ancestors but had connections with Civil War soldiers from Ohio. Margaret Hamilton, the “Wicked Witch of the West,” was born in Cleveland, Ohio on December 9, 1902, to attorney Walter Jones Hamilton and his wife Mary Jane Adams; Margaret’s grandfather was Judge Edwin Timothy Hamilton. Judge Hamilton had served as a private in Co. D of the 84 th Ohio Infantry during the summer of 1862. The 84 th Ohio, a three months’ regiment, served nearly the whole of its service attached to the Railroad District in western Ma...
Read more

The Vaunted Enfield Rifle Musket

Image
     The English-made Model 1853 .577 caliber Enfield Rifle Musket was widely regarded as the best infantry arm in the world at the outbreak of the Civil War in April 1861. Favorable international press describing its efficiency in the Crimean War and in suppressing the Indian rebellion led to the widespread desire of American infantrymen (both Federal and Confederate) to be armed with these accurate and well-made arms. The lock plate of this well-worn P1853 Enfield rifle musket produced in 1862 shows the typical markings of a British-made weapon that made it through the Federal blockade.  ( Army of Tennessee Relics ) Enfield-pattern weapons were imported into the states by the tens and hundreds of thousands during the war years; one estimate stated that the Federal government purchased 500,000 while the Confederates purchased another 400,000. The Confederate government dispatched Captain Caleb Huse to Europe in April 1861 to purchase weapons and Huse focused on se...
Read more

In front of Atlanta with the 68th Ohio

Image
  The arrow corps badge of the 17th Army Corps was worn by many members of the 68th Ohio in the latter days of the war.       Private Edward A. Bigelow of Co. F of the 68th Ohio Volunteer Infantry wrote this brief account of the Battle of Atlanta just two days afterwards to his father back home in Henry County, Ohio. The regiment formed a part of Colonel Robert K. Scott's three regiment all-Ohio brigade consisting of the 20th, 68th, and 78th regiments, being designated the Second Brigade of the Third Division of Frank Blair's 17th Army Corps. Bigelow's letter originally appeared in the Napoleon Press newspaper and was copied in the Toledo Daily Commercial which was providential as no known copies exist today of the wartime Napoleon Press.  
Read more

Charging Battery Robinett: An Alabama Soldier Recalls the Vicious Fighting at Corinth

Image
W riting 30 years after the Battle of Corinth, James A. McKinstry of the 42 nd Alabama recalled his experiences storming Battery Robinett with Colonel William P. Rogers of the 2 nd Texas and expressed guilt that it was perhaps his action that brought about the colonel’s demise. “On seeing a line of Federals approaching, and before giving the situation a thought, I immediately raised my gun and fired full into the breast of a Federal sergeant, who was in front of the column, and only a short distance from us.  'Twas then that Captain George Foster shouted, "Cease firing, men! cease firing!" and waved his handkerchief, then I realized the true situation. 'Twas too late! That fatal volley had been turned on our little band from the muzzles of 1,500 muskets. I was still standing just as I was when I fired my last shot, and within a few feet of Colonel Rogers, when a Minie ball went crashing through my left hip and turned me half round; another went tearing through my ...
Read more

Cook & Brother of New Orleans

Image
    The lockplate of a New Orleans-made Cook & Brother Enfield rifle produced in 1862 shows the fine craftsmanship that became the hallmark of the maker throughout the Civil War. Note the stars and bars flag at left, an emblem used on C&B's production throughout the war and the Cook & Brother, N.O. 1862 markings. Earlier production weapons at New Orleans had the flag located just above the maker's name while later weapons produced in Athens, Georgia would have a modified flag and Athens on the plate followed by the serial number.        In the spring of 1861, two English-born businessmen, Ferdinand and Francis Cook of New Orleans, perceived the need for the South to have its own domestic production of firearms and  set out to prove "that rifles could made here as well as in Yankee land or in Europe." The brothers  elected to produce copies of the British Model 1853 .577 caliber Enfield rifle as this was considered the benchmark longarm...
Read more

I Want to See a Battle: A Hoosier at Shiloh

Image
W riting in his diary, Private Manius Buchanan of the 29 th Indiana recalled the eagerness with which his regiment marched towards Savannah, Tennessee with the sounds of the battle of Shiloh ringing in their ears.           “The forced march was kept up until 2 p.m. when we were halted until 4 p.m,” he noted. “The rest was really needed, but the continual question is ‘Why are we stopped here?’ The sound of battle increased in volume and anxiety to be up and doing grows more intense. As I am weak from a late sickness, I am urged to fall to the rear; but no, in common with all, I want to see a battle and fear this will be my only chance.” The regiment would go into action the following afternoon, and of the four neighborhood boys who had enlisted together in Co. B, only Buchanan escaped unscathed. One afternoon's exposure to the horrors of battle was all it took to satisfy this Hoosier's desire to see the elephant. “I wanted to see a battl...
Read more

An Interview with Forrest in May 1864

Image
  “The noise of battle is the only music that ravishes the senses of Forrest.” I t was May 1864. Back east, the Army of Northern Virginia and the Army of the Potomac were locked in the deadly dance of the Overland Campaign while in Georgia, General William Tecumseh Sherman's army squared off against General Joseph E. Johnston and the Army of the Tennessee in the campaign for Atlanta.       Based in relatively quiet northern Mississippi, General Nathan Bedford Forrest bided his time waiting for a Federal advance from Memphis. Earlier in the month, General Samuel Sturgis led a brief campaign into Mississippi but Forrest was sure Sturgis would venture out again. In the meantime, he tried to keep his reorganized command intact despite persistent demands from his superiors that he return the absentees and deserters who inflated his ranks (nearly 1,000 in number) to their original commands.      Around this same time,  an old acquaintance from Me...
Read more