Following Glory: Two New Yorkers Recall the Charge on Battery Wagner

Much historical attention has been focused on the efforts of the 54th Massachusetts in being the initial regiment of the assault upon Battery Wagner on July 18, 1863; however, today’s post dives into the story of the Federal regiments that followed the 54th in the assault column. A total of two brigades took part in the assault- the leading brigade under General George C. Strong was led by the 54th Massachusetts, followed by the 6th Connecticut, then the 48th New York, all of which managed to climb the ramparts, but the remainder of Strong’s brigade (the 9th Maine, 3rd New Hampshire, and 76th Pennsylvania) became pinned down by Confederate artillery fire and did not get into the fort.

          The ‘second wave’ of the assault column was Colonel Haldimand Putnam’s four-regiment brigade consisting of his own 7th New Hampshire, the 100th New York, and two Buckeye regiments, the 62nd Ohio and 67th Ohio both of whose stories at Battery Wagner have been previously covered on the blog. Putnam’s men had no better success than General Strong’s men and suffered heavy casualties trying to push the assault over the hump. Shortly after midnight, the exhausted Federals fell back leaving hundreds of their dead and wounded strewn along the ramparts.

          Today’s post will feature accounts from a pair of New Yorkers who took part in the ill-fated assault: William W. Watkins of the 48th New York and William H. Mason on Co. C of the 100th New York. Watkins, wounded and captured during the assault, called it simply “a short work of death.” Both letters originally saw publication in New York state newspapers and appear courtesy of the New York State Military Museum and Veterans Research Center.

 

Lieutenant Colonel James M. Green of the 48th New York was killed in action at Battery Wagner on July 18, 1863 "while driving his knife into a Secesh gunner" as William Watkins relates in his account. Green, a native of Brooklyn, initially led Co. F of the 48th as captain before being promoted successively to major in June 1862 then lieutenant colonel at the end of the year. In early 1863, he posed for the image above while the regiment was stationed at Fort Pulaski, Georgia.
(Liljenquist Family Collection, Library of Congress)

Private William W. Watkins, Co. B, 48th New York:

          This morning, the 48th New York came into camp, wet through, and completely used up after all these days and nights of excitement and hard work. They had one ration of whiskey and received a few hours sleep when the regiment was ordered to move to the front in line of battle. The batteries and naval ships had already opened fire and were directing their fire on Fort Wagner when suddenly Fort Sumter and other well-known Rebel strongholds were all speaking by the cannon’s loud voice.

          It was a grand sight for us to witness. About 5 or 6 p.m., we received a ration of whiskey having had but little to eat during the day; all around us as far as we could see was one swarm of shells flying and exploding. As evening grew near, the sea breeze fanned us a little then we started double quick up the beach for Fort Wagner. Cheers were given to the 48th by other regiments, General Strong riding along without hat or cap, noticing us as if it might be for the last time, but it was a brave and honest expression of hope for victory. We heartily cheered the general and on we went, under severe shelling from Sumter from which place we could be seen and our motive understood.

          When within a few yards of Fort Wagner, volley followed volley, and the Minie balls took down our men while in turned we aimed at the heads of the Secesh. A steady battle was not on the work, the shades of night overtook us and the fight grew more desperate. Our men fell but gained steadily, crossing the moat and over the first ditch, and on to the parapet with our colors. Colonel Barton was wounded; Lieutenant Colonel James Green of Troy, N.Y. was killed while driving his knife into a Secesh gunner. General Strong was wounded, too, but on they came to the slaughter.

Lieutenant (later major) James A. Barrett
Co. H, 48th, N.Y.
Wounded at Fort Wagner

          Our men are in close action and two bayonets were run through a Rebel colonel who boldly came out in the night endeavoring to rally his men “to glory” as he remarked. Private Burnett of Co. K took the Rebel’s sword and brought it from the battleground. Now came the tug of war. The 9th Maine played on us the same trick they had previously done on the same ground with the 76th Pennsylvania; it seems hard to go back on any regiment that has anything to do in this war, but so very important to us was the capture of Fort Wagner that any regiment which failed to support the storming party already grasping the prize should receive the worst of censure.

          We found the fort was arched with caves and holes in the earth, entrenchments and ditches all filled with the enemy waiting for us. There were sand heaps of great thickness, palmetto logs, cotton bales, iron, and being regularly casemated it will take much naval power to reduce it.

          Our men were being taken prisoners and we in turn took some Rebels prisoners. It was a hand-to-hand fight. I was taken prisoner but escaped the same night. On my way back to our lines, a shell from Sumter exploded within two or three feet of my face and from that instant I have not been able to write until today (July 29th). I didn’t know anything until the next day at about 11 o’clock when I was brought off the battlefield by two privates of another regiment who, in the excitement of the hour, took me to be a Rebel.

          The 100th New York, by some mistake, fired into our regiment and did much injury to the 48th. Glass bottles, nails, hand grenades, buckshot, and small pigeon shot were used against us; and it can be proved that chain shot was used as a piece was brought off by our men. It was a short work of death. But few of the old 48th volunteers are now left. But the Rebels say the 48th did not fight like men but like tigers and also that no short contest since the war started has equaled the desperate charge on the night of the 18th at Fort Wagner.

          Could the regiments but have had light to see and work harmoniously, the fort would have been ours but as strong a place as it is, and dark as it was that night, it is no wonder that large a number were killed and wounded.

 

Casualties sustained at Fort Wagner advanced George H. Stowits from second lieutenant to first lieutenant of Co. K of the 100th New York. Promoted to captain and transferred to Co. A on October 23, 1864, he was wounded four days later in the fighting on Darbytown Road during the Petersburg campaign. 

Private William H. Mason, Co. C, 100th New York:

          On July 18th at daylight, we fell back from the picket line to the rifle pits. The Rebs commenced shelling us as soon as they could see to which our gunboats answered rapidly. Around the middle of the forenoon, our batteries opened and the ironclads commenced moving up and at 11:55 the first shot was fired from the iron fleet, the wooden blockaders keeping up a smart fire at long range.  Moultrie kept almost perfect silence during the day. The bombardment continued from land and water until about 5 o’clock when it appeared that the fort had been silenced.

          The columns then commenced moving to take it by storm. Fort Sumter shelled our troops as they advanced until we got to within close range of Fort Wagner then the Rebs poured in a murderous fire of grape, canister, and musketry, besides throwing hand grenades. Regiment after regiment charged on the fort, each one retreating in good order in their turn except the 9th Maine which broke and ran in a confused mass through the lines of the 6th Connecticut, 7th New Hampshire, and the 100th New York. The 54th Massachusetts led the charge and did well with the exception of a few panic-stricken men.

          Not more than half of any regiment in the charge came out unhurt. We had almost 4,000 men in the field with no artillery against 1,500 men behind breastworks, pits, and bomb-proofs. It was dark when the fight commenced and it lasted about three hours. Our retreating, battle-worn, and wounded troops were fired into and cut down by our own drunken artillerymen of the 1st U.S. and 5th Rhode Island who answered the groans of the wounded with “Go to the front you cowardly dogs, or we will blow your brains out!”

          Our regiment went in with 15 officers and 509 enlisted men; the next morning the assembly was beat to ascertain our loss. All we could muster was five officers and 225 men.

 Sources:

Letter from Private William W. Watkins, Co. B, 48th New York, Brooklyn City News (New York), August 1863

Letter from Private William H. Mason, Co. C, 100th New York Volunteer Infantry, Buffalo Morning Express (New York), July 29, 1863, pg. 2

Comments

Post a Comment

Most Popular Posts

Arming the Buckeyes: Longarms of the Ohio Infantry Regiments

Image
     A common question that comes up in conversation about Civil War Buckeye regiments is "What were they armed with?" We are fortunate in that the state of Ohio kept good records of how the regiments were armed when they went into service, this being especially true for those regiments which went into service in 1861 and 1862. The state adjutant general's reports for 1861 and 1862 have been heavily drawn upon to construct this article, as well as consultation with Phil Spaugy who has done extensive research on how Ohio's troops were armed during the war.      Buckeyes carried a fairly wide variety of weapons into the field, and the below article breaks this down into weapons of both domestic manufacture and imported arms. The early days of the war found the state of Ohio practically bereft of longarms; as an example, when the 1st and 2nd Ohio Volunteer Militia left the state in late April 1861, they left unarmed, being armed at Lancaster, Pennsylvania on t...
Read more

Bullets for the Union: Manufacturing Small Arms Ammunition During the Civil War

Image
       Civil War bullets are perhaps the most common item collected from the era; the two armies expended bullets by the millions during the four years’ conflict and spent or deformed bullets of all shapes and sizes have made fascinating and affordable collectibles since the guns went silent in 1865.       I recently acquired a display piece featuring 35 different types of small arms ammunition used during the Civil War, including everything from a small .28 caliber ball up to a .69 caliber three-ring Minie and it triggered some questions: how did the Federal army obtain its small arms ammunition during the war? Where did the lead come from to make the bullets, and where and how was the ammunition manufactured? This post seeks to answer those questions. A typical .58 caliber 3-ring Minie bullet   “Whenever the blasts of war blow in the ears of men who trade in the implements of destruction, they are apt to experience more joy than the true ...
Read more

Dressing the Rebels: How to Dye Butternut Jeans Cloth

Image
     In the early days of the Civil War,  the Southern states found themselves with an abundance of cotton but a shortage of cloth with which to make army uniforms. The trade in cloth prior to the war had largely been to send raw cotton or wool north to New England (or Great Britain) where it was converted into usable cloth; but now that trade was broken and the Southern states were thrown upon their own resources in their efforts to properly clothe the Confederate army.  This collection of Confederate enlisted men's frock coats and shell jackets gives some indication of the variety of shades of butternut worn during the war. All of them are shades of yellow brown, some heavier on the yellow and some heavier on the brown. The blue used around the collar or as rank insignia indicates that the soldier was in the infantry. Surviving Confederate uniforms are considered rather rare and command quite a healthy price in the collecting market. For an in-depth study of h...
Read more

The Wizard of Oz and the Civil War

Image
T he 1939 film The Wizard of Oz has delighted viewers for 85 years and ranks as a personal favorite, especially during the Halloween season. While watching it with the family the other night, I wondered if there were any connections between the film and the Civil War. Not surprisingly, the answer is yes and those connections touch both the blue and the gray.           Interestingly both “witches” in the film not only had Civil War ancestors but had connections with Civil War soldiers from Ohio. Margaret Hamilton, the “Wicked Witch of the West,” was born in Cleveland, Ohio on December 9, 1902, to attorney Walter Jones Hamilton and his wife Mary Jane Adams; Margaret’s grandfather was Judge Edwin Timothy Hamilton. Judge Hamilton had served as a private in Co. D of the 84 th Ohio Infantry during the summer of 1862. The 84 th Ohio, a three months’ regiment, served nearly the whole of its service attached to the Railroad District in western Ma...
Read more

The Vaunted Enfield Rifle Musket

Image
     The English-made Model 1853 .577 caliber Enfield Rifle Musket was widely regarded as the best infantry arm in the world at the outbreak of the Civil War in April 1861. Favorable international press describing its efficiency in the Crimean War and in suppressing the Indian rebellion led to the widespread desire of American infantrymen (both Federal and Confederate) to be armed with these accurate and well-made arms. The lock plate of this well-worn P1853 Enfield rifle musket produced in 1862 shows the typical markings of a British-made weapon that made it through the Federal blockade.  ( Army of Tennessee Relics ) Enfield-pattern weapons were imported into the states by the tens and hundreds of thousands during the war years; one estimate stated that the Federal government purchased 500,000 while the Confederates purchased another 400,000. The Confederate government dispatched Captain Caleb Huse to Europe in April 1861 to purchase weapons and Huse focused on se...
Read more

In front of Atlanta with the 68th Ohio

Image
  The arrow corps badge of the 17th Army Corps was worn by many members of the 68th Ohio in the latter days of the war.       Private Edward A. Bigelow of Co. F of the 68th Ohio Volunteer Infantry wrote this brief account of the Battle of Atlanta just two days afterwards to his father back home in Henry County, Ohio. The regiment formed a part of Colonel Robert K. Scott's three regiment all-Ohio brigade consisting of the 20th, 68th, and 78th regiments, being designated the Second Brigade of the Third Division of Frank Blair's 17th Army Corps. Bigelow's letter originally appeared in the Napoleon Press newspaper and was copied in the Toledo Daily Commercial which was providential as no known copies exist today of the wartime Napoleon Press.  
Read more

Charging Battery Robinett: An Alabama Soldier Recalls the Vicious Fighting at Corinth

Image
W riting 30 years after the Battle of Corinth, James A. McKinstry of the 42 nd Alabama recalled his experiences storming Battery Robinett with Colonel William P. Rogers of the 2 nd Texas and expressed guilt that it was perhaps his action that brought about the colonel’s demise. “On seeing a line of Federals approaching, and before giving the situation a thought, I immediately raised my gun and fired full into the breast of a Federal sergeant, who was in front of the column, and only a short distance from us.  'Twas then that Captain George Foster shouted, "Cease firing, men! cease firing!" and waved his handkerchief, then I realized the true situation. 'Twas too late! That fatal volley had been turned on our little band from the muzzles of 1,500 muskets. I was still standing just as I was when I fired my last shot, and within a few feet of Colonel Rogers, when a Minie ball went crashing through my left hip and turned me half round; another went tearing through my ...
Read more

Cook & Brother of New Orleans

Image
    The lockplate of a New Orleans-made Cook & Brother Enfield rifle produced in 1862 shows the fine craftsmanship that became the hallmark of the maker throughout the Civil War. Note the stars and bars flag at left, an emblem used on C&B's production throughout the war and the Cook & Brother, N.O. 1862 markings. Earlier production weapons at New Orleans had the flag located just above the maker's name while later weapons produced in Athens, Georgia would have a modified flag and Athens on the plate followed by the serial number.        In the spring of 1861, two English-born businessmen, Ferdinand and Francis Cook of New Orleans, perceived the need for the South to have its own domestic production of firearms and  set out to prove "that rifles could made here as well as in Yankee land or in Europe." The brothers  elected to produce copies of the British Model 1853 .577 caliber Enfield rifle as this was considered the benchmark longarm...
Read more

I Want to See a Battle: A Hoosier at Shiloh

Image
W riting in his diary, Private Manius Buchanan of the 29 th Indiana recalled the eagerness with which his regiment marched towards Savannah, Tennessee with the sounds of the battle of Shiloh ringing in their ears.           “The forced march was kept up until 2 p.m. when we were halted until 4 p.m,” he noted. “The rest was really needed, but the continual question is ‘Why are we stopped here?’ The sound of battle increased in volume and anxiety to be up and doing grows more intense. As I am weak from a late sickness, I am urged to fall to the rear; but no, in common with all, I want to see a battle and fear this will be my only chance.” The regiment would go into action the following afternoon, and of the four neighborhood boys who had enlisted together in Co. B, only Buchanan escaped unscathed. One afternoon's exposure to the horrors of battle was all it took to satisfy this Hoosier's desire to see the elephant. “I wanted to see a battl...
Read more

An Interview with Forrest in May 1864

Image
  “The noise of battle is the only music that ravishes the senses of Forrest.” I t was May 1864. Back east, the Army of Northern Virginia and the Army of the Potomac were locked in the deadly dance of the Overland Campaign while in Georgia, General William Tecumseh Sherman's army squared off against General Joseph E. Johnston and the Army of the Tennessee in the campaign for Atlanta.       Based in relatively quiet northern Mississippi, General Nathan Bedford Forrest bided his time waiting for a Federal advance from Memphis. Earlier in the month, General Samuel Sturgis led a brief campaign into Mississippi but Forrest was sure Sturgis would venture out again. In the meantime, he tried to keep his reorganized command intact despite persistent demands from his superiors that he return the absentees and deserters who inflated his ranks (nearly 1,000 in number) to their original commands.      Around this same time,  an old acquaintance from Me...
Read more