Disaster for the 71st Indiana at “the Richmond Races”

In the middle of August 1862, the 71st Indiana Volunteer Infantry mustered into service and was immediately dispatched to Kentucky to guard that state against a rumored Confederate invasion. Two weeks later, the regiment took part in a disastrous battle outside the town of Richmond, Kentucky and suffered heavily. The initial reports from Kentucky were frightening: “According to the statements of the letters which we have, the regiment is almost entirely destroyed and captured,” reported the Daily Wabash Express of Terre Haute, Indiana. “It is painful to contemplate the misfortune of the gallant men composing that regiment. It has cast a general gloom over this whole community. The regiment is almost a total loss, but we hope, however, that the loss in killed may not prove so great as the circumstances lead us to suppose at present.”[1]

 

Richmond Battlefield


          As news slowly trickled in, Terre Haute residents mourned to learn that their fellow townsman, Colonel Melville D. Topping, numbered among the slain of Richmond. “Much against his wishes and with sad forebodings, Colonel Topping obeyed the order to lead his undisciplined and scarcely armed men to find and fight three times their number of Rebels under General Kirby Smith. By a forced march they were hurried with blistered feet and weary into the battlefield at Richmond. Manfully they contested that field for two days. He was pierced through a body by a musket ball. Knowing his wound to be mortal, he refused to have any other soldier quit his post to care for him- his only anxiety was for the cause he loved. His orderly, however, procured a wagon and brought him off from the field and received his parting messages. He asked his officers if he had done his duty. The reply was “You have done nobly.” Said he, “Then I am satisfied to die. Tell my wife my last thoughts are of her and my children.” On the way to town, he expired.”[2]

 


          On September 8th, more than 200 men from the 71st Indiana arrived home in Terre Haute on parole and finally the whole story could be told. It was an exceedingly unpleasant tale of dauntless courage, inept leadership, and even brutality. “It is quite certain that General [Mahlon] Manson disobeyed orders in taking his forces into an engagement at that time,” wrote the Express. “The regiments under his command were composed entirely of undisciplined troops who were perfectly ignorant of military duty. The officers of the regiments with few exceptions were as green as the private soldiers and in many instances more so. The troops had been drilled but a short time and had learned little of the movements of an army when in battle. They were totally unfit for an engagement with veteran troops unless it was absolutely necessary, which was not the case in this instance.”[3]  Captain Edward B. Allen of Co. B later reported that it was not until the “morning of the 29th the regiment for the first time since its organization was exercised in battalion drill which consisted of loading and firing by company and by file, the advancing in battle line.”[4]

 

Relics belonging to General Mahlon Manson at Richmond Battlefield

Both General Manson and General William “Bull” Nelson were criticized for their brutality with their own troops. One local reverend went to the battlefield to find his wounded son and learned that General Nelson had struck his son down with his sword. “It is reported and corroborated by everyone with whom we have spoken that after he was wounded and retiring to the hospital he was met by General Nelson and ordered back. In his endeavor to explain, Nelson struck him a blow with his sword, knocking him down and cutting a severe gash in his head.”[5] General Manson was charged with being a brute and a fool. “His conduct from the first to the last was most detestable and his name will go down in posterity loaded with the execrations of the people of this state,” opined the Express. “Our troops did not go into Kentucky to be slaughtered, murdered, and devoured through the crimes of the commanding General.”[6]

 

It is clear that the Battle of Richmond should not have been fought; it was positively against General Nelson’s orders and the battle proved a bloody disaster for the Union Army. Orderly Sergeant Isaac M. Brown of Co. H of the 71st Indiana wrote the following account of the battle in an article published in 1885. On August 25, 1862, the regiment had been in service for a week and was camped at Nicholasville, Kentucky. “During and up to this time the regiment knew but little if anything about drill-not ten men in a company could even go through the manual of arms. In this condition, we received orders to pack our knapsacks and be ready to enter upon a forced march at 4 p.m. to Richmond, a point we were ordered to reach by sun-up the next morning, the distance being 25 miles. The point was reached on time but a more fatigued looking set of men, none of us had ever seen before,” he wrote.

 

“In the afternoon of the 26th, we marched out on a hill south of Richmond and went into camp. Here we had a good view of the road leading to Rogersville, a small place at the foot of Big Hill, at which point General Kirby Smith with his Rebel forces was camped. On the 28th, we had a little skirmish with a squadron of his cavalry, but no damage was done on either side, only we captured a small piece of artillery thrown out as bait. In the afternoon of the 29th, we advanced on the road leading to Big Hill to within three-quarters of a mile of the enemy’s camp. Company H held the post of honor on picket, being nearest to the enemy. I was on duty the entire night putting on reliefs and being anxious to see that the enemy should not advance without due warning. Six mounted men from General Munday’s Kentucky cavalry were placed in advance of our post with orders to fire and fall back slowly if attacked. About 4 a.m. on the morning of the 30th, the enemy fired upon those videttes and they came back on our post as fast as their horses could bring them, and one of the men lost his gun in his hurry to get back. I halted them and ordered them to return to their post, threatening to report them if they did not. They had not more than reached their former position when about 40 shots were fired into them by the enemy and the cavalry again came back on the run.”

Field hospital at Mount Zion Church

 

“Company H was in line to do its duty on the approach of the enemy. I ordered two of the cavalrymen to report to General Manson’s headquarters and inform him that the enemy was advancing in force. During this suspense, my captain John J. Starnes took four men and advanced about 100 yards down the road and the enemy fired a pretty heavy volley into this squad and Corporal William Irvin of Co. H fell dead. This was the first blood spilled in the battle of Richmond. It was barely day light when this took place. Finally, all the forces under General Manson and General Charles Cruft were taking the positions assigned to them on the double quick. The ball opened and there were nearly two hours of continual firing of artillery and musketry before the line began to fall back. The distance from Rogersville to Richmond is called seven miles and I do not think there is a half-mile in that distance where our men did not take a stand. Colonel Topping was killed near the brick church about one mile from Richmond. I passed him during a heavy fire from the enemy. He was lying on his back with his hands folded across his breast a little below where the fatal ball entered. Major William Conklin was killed a short distance south of the church and our quartermaster lost an arm. There was no general stampede until we had to give way at the graveyard in the suburbs of Richmond and this took place at sundown.”[7]

 

Command of the 71st Indiana devolved to the senior surviving captain Edward Allen of Co. B who described the closing moments of the battle. “The confusion appeared to be so great that, but little attention prevailed among the men as to which company or regiment they fought in as they had already become greatly fatigued and exhausted for want of water and food- weak and tired, they fell into line wherever it was most convenient. The battle here was a severe artillery duel and briskly contrasted by musketry by the Second Brigade. The battle here lasted about one hour when it was found the enemy was flanking us on both wings and the column gave way and retreated on the road to Richmond. When the head of the retreating column had arrived within one mile of Richmond and in great confusion, it was met by General Nelson who was just then reaching the army from Lexington. He ordered us to again form a line of battle to meet the approaching enemy. But a small portion of the army was rallied by him at that point and the stand made was of very brief duration. I took no part in this last engagement as my command had become very much scattered. Indeed, the organization of nearly all the regiments seemed to have become broken and the army was drifting along with its parts entirely at the mercy of chance,” Captain Allen noted.[8]


 

Sergeant Brown continued his narrative: “I was captured on the Nicholasville pike nearly eight miles from Richmond about 9 o’clock by men under Captain John Starnes of the 1st Tennessee Cavalry, and he was one of my own cousins. We were taken back to Richmond the next morning and put in the courthouse yard. About noon a Rebel officer gave orders for all first sergeants to make a roll call of the men belonging to their company and report to General Kirby Smith for endorsement so that rations might be issued. I found General Smith sitting at a desk in a large wholesale grocery house he had taken possession of and from that stock two days’ rations were given us,” Brown wrote.[9]  Captain Allen managed to escape and the following day he gathered six commissioned officers and 217 enlisted men, all that remained of the nearly 1,000 men who took the field at Richmond and listed 26 men killed, another 131 wounded. The balance of the regiment was captured then paroled a few days later. The 71st Indiana returned to the state then would reorganize and serve the remainder of the war as the 6th Indiana Cavalry.


[1] “From the 71st Regiment,” Daily Wabash Express (Indiana), September 3, 1862, pg. 2

[2] “Col. Topping,” Daily Wabash Express (Indiana), September 17, 1862, pg. 2

[3] “The 71st Regiment,” Daily Wabash Express (Indiana), September 5, 1862, pg. 2

[4] “Report of the engagement of the 71st Regiment at Richmond, Ky.,” Daily Wabash Express (Indiana), September 23, 1862, pg. 2

[5] “The 71st Regiment,” Daily Wabash Express (Indiana), September 8, 1862, pg. 3

[6] “The 71st Regiment,” September 5, 1862, op. cit.

[7] “Battle of Richmond, Ky.,” The Columbus Republic (Indiana), December 10, 1885, pg. 2

[8] Allen’s report, op. cit.

[9] “Battle of Richmond, Ky.,” op. cit.

Comments

Post a Comment

Most Popular Posts

Arming the Buckeyes: Longarms of the Ohio Infantry Regiments

Image
     A common question that comes up in conversation about Civil War Buckeye regiments is "What were they armed with?" We are fortunate in that the state of Ohio kept good records of how the regiments were armed when they went into service, this being especially true for those regiments which went into service in 1861 and 1862. The state adjutant general's reports for 1861 and 1862 have been heavily drawn upon to construct this article, as well as consultation with Phil Spaugy who has done extensive research on how Ohio's troops were armed during the war.      Buckeyes carried a fairly wide variety of weapons into the field, and the below article breaks this down into weapons of both domestic manufacture and imported arms. The early days of the war found the state of Ohio practically bereft of longarms; as an example, when the 1st and 2nd Ohio Volunteer Militia left the state in late April 1861, they left unarmed, being armed at Lancaster, Pennsylvania on t...
Read more

Bullets for the Union: Manufacturing Small Arms Ammunition During the Civil War

Image
       Civil War bullets are perhaps the most common item collected from the era; the two armies expended bullets by the millions during the four years’ conflict and spent or deformed bullets of all shapes and sizes have made fascinating and affordable collectibles since the guns went silent in 1865.       I recently acquired a display piece featuring 35 different types of small arms ammunition used during the Civil War, including everything from a small .28 caliber ball up to a .69 caliber three-ring Minie and it triggered some questions: how did the Federal army obtain its small arms ammunition during the war? Where did the lead come from to make the bullets, and where and how was the ammunition manufactured? This post seeks to answer those questions. A typical .58 caliber 3-ring Minie bullet   “Whenever the blasts of war blow in the ears of men who trade in the implements of destruction, they are apt to experience more joy than the true ...
Read more

Dressing the Rebels: How to Dye Butternut Jeans Cloth

Image
     In the early days of the Civil War,  the Southern states found themselves with an abundance of cotton but a shortage of cloth with which to make army uniforms. The trade in cloth prior to the war had largely been to send raw cotton or wool north to New England (or Great Britain) where it was converted into usable cloth; but now that trade was broken and the Southern states were thrown upon their own resources in their efforts to properly clothe the Confederate army.  This collection of Confederate enlisted men's frock coats and shell jackets gives some indication of the variety of shades of butternut worn during the war. All of them are shades of yellow brown, some heavier on the yellow and some heavier on the brown. The blue used around the collar or as rank insignia indicates that the soldier was in the infantry. Surviving Confederate uniforms are considered rather rare and command quite a healthy price in the collecting market. For an in-depth study of h...
Read more

The Wizard of Oz and the Civil War

Image
T he 1939 film The Wizard of Oz has delighted viewers for 85 years and ranks as a personal favorite, especially during the Halloween season. While watching it with the family the other night, I wondered if there were any connections between the film and the Civil War. Not surprisingly, the answer is yes and those connections touch both the blue and the gray.           Interestingly both “witches” in the film not only had Civil War ancestors but had connections with Civil War soldiers from Ohio. Margaret Hamilton, the “Wicked Witch of the West,” was born in Cleveland, Ohio on December 9, 1902, to attorney Walter Jones Hamilton and his wife Mary Jane Adams; Margaret’s grandfather was Judge Edwin Timothy Hamilton. Judge Hamilton had served as a private in Co. D of the 84 th Ohio Infantry during the summer of 1862. The 84 th Ohio, a three months’ regiment, served nearly the whole of its service attached to the Railroad District in western Ma...
Read more

The Vaunted Enfield Rifle Musket

Image
     The English-made Model 1853 .577 caliber Enfield Rifle Musket was widely regarded as the best infantry arm in the world at the outbreak of the Civil War in April 1861. Favorable international press describing its efficiency in the Crimean War and in suppressing the Indian rebellion led to the widespread desire of American infantrymen (both Federal and Confederate) to be armed with these accurate and well-made arms. The lock plate of this well-worn P1853 Enfield rifle musket produced in 1862 shows the typical markings of a British-made weapon that made it through the Federal blockade.  ( Army of Tennessee Relics ) Enfield-pattern weapons were imported into the states by the tens and hundreds of thousands during the war years; one estimate stated that the Federal government purchased 500,000 while the Confederates purchased another 400,000. The Confederate government dispatched Captain Caleb Huse to Europe in April 1861 to purchase weapons and Huse focused on se...
Read more

In front of Atlanta with the 68th Ohio

Image
  The arrow corps badge of the 17th Army Corps was worn by many members of the 68th Ohio in the latter days of the war.       Private Edward A. Bigelow of Co. F of the 68th Ohio Volunteer Infantry wrote this brief account of the Battle of Atlanta just two days afterwards to his father back home in Henry County, Ohio. The regiment formed a part of Colonel Robert K. Scott's three regiment all-Ohio brigade consisting of the 20th, 68th, and 78th regiments, being designated the Second Brigade of the Third Division of Frank Blair's 17th Army Corps. Bigelow's letter originally appeared in the Napoleon Press newspaper and was copied in the Toledo Daily Commercial which was providential as no known copies exist today of the wartime Napoleon Press.  
Read more

Charging Battery Robinett: An Alabama Soldier Recalls the Vicious Fighting at Corinth

Image
W riting 30 years after the Battle of Corinth, James A. McKinstry of the 42 nd Alabama recalled his experiences storming Battery Robinett with Colonel William P. Rogers of the 2 nd Texas and expressed guilt that it was perhaps his action that brought about the colonel’s demise. “On seeing a line of Federals approaching, and before giving the situation a thought, I immediately raised my gun and fired full into the breast of a Federal sergeant, who was in front of the column, and only a short distance from us.  'Twas then that Captain George Foster shouted, "Cease firing, men! cease firing!" and waved his handkerchief, then I realized the true situation. 'Twas too late! That fatal volley had been turned on our little band from the muzzles of 1,500 muskets. I was still standing just as I was when I fired my last shot, and within a few feet of Colonel Rogers, when a Minie ball went crashing through my left hip and turned me half round; another went tearing through my ...
Read more

Cook & Brother of New Orleans

Image
    The lockplate of a New Orleans-made Cook & Brother Enfield rifle produced in 1862 shows the fine craftsmanship that became the hallmark of the maker throughout the Civil War. Note the stars and bars flag at left, an emblem used on C&B's production throughout the war and the Cook & Brother, N.O. 1862 markings. Earlier production weapons at New Orleans had the flag located just above the maker's name while later weapons produced in Athens, Georgia would have a modified flag and Athens on the plate followed by the serial number.        In the spring of 1861, two English-born businessmen, Ferdinand and Francis Cook of New Orleans, perceived the need for the South to have its own domestic production of firearms and  set out to prove "that rifles could made here as well as in Yankee land or in Europe." The brothers  elected to produce copies of the British Model 1853 .577 caliber Enfield rifle as this was considered the benchmark longarm...
Read more

I Want to See a Battle: A Hoosier at Shiloh

Image
W riting in his diary, Private Manius Buchanan of the 29 th Indiana recalled the eagerness with which his regiment marched towards Savannah, Tennessee with the sounds of the battle of Shiloh ringing in their ears.           “The forced march was kept up until 2 p.m. when we were halted until 4 p.m,” he noted. “The rest was really needed, but the continual question is ‘Why are we stopped here?’ The sound of battle increased in volume and anxiety to be up and doing grows more intense. As I am weak from a late sickness, I am urged to fall to the rear; but no, in common with all, I want to see a battle and fear this will be my only chance.” The regiment would go into action the following afternoon, and of the four neighborhood boys who had enlisted together in Co. B, only Buchanan escaped unscathed. One afternoon's exposure to the horrors of battle was all it took to satisfy this Hoosier's desire to see the elephant. “I wanted to see a battl...
Read more

An Interview with Forrest in May 1864

Image
  “The noise of battle is the only music that ravishes the senses of Forrest.” I t was May 1864. Back east, the Army of Northern Virginia and the Army of the Potomac were locked in the deadly dance of the Overland Campaign while in Georgia, General William Tecumseh Sherman's army squared off against General Joseph E. Johnston and the Army of the Tennessee in the campaign for Atlanta.       Based in relatively quiet northern Mississippi, General Nathan Bedford Forrest bided his time waiting for a Federal advance from Memphis. Earlier in the month, General Samuel Sturgis led a brief campaign into Mississippi but Forrest was sure Sturgis would venture out again. In the meantime, he tried to keep his reorganized command intact despite persistent demands from his superiors that he return the absentees and deserters who inflated his ranks (nearly 1,000 in number) to their original commands.      Around this same time,  an old acquaintance from Me...
Read more