Moving Upon the Tender Places of the Confederacy: General Hazen on the Atlanta Campaign

In the aftermath of the three Confederate offensives to defend Atlanta in late July 1864, General William B. Hazen, then leading the Second Brigade of the Third Division of the Fourth Army Corps (Army of the Cumberland), wrote this extraordinary letter to a friend back in Ohio. The Atlanta campaign had just passed its bloodiest period, but Hazen believed that the true battlefront was not in Georgia: it was at the ballot box back in Ohio. One of the nation’s foremost fighting generals saw that the true power for ending the rebellion rested in the hands of the civilians, not the army. “Our first great battle must be at the ballot box and the war power must be sustained at all hazards,” he opined. Hazen believed that by August 1864, the army could not win or lose the war: that result depended on the civilians.

 

"Our first great battle must be at the ballot box and the war power must be sustained at all hazards," General Hazen wrote in August 1864. Hazen felt that Lincoln's defeat would be worth "50 Manassas" victories. 

Yet Hazen and his comrades had ample work before them. John Bell Hood and his legions of the Army of Tennessee, battered and bruised but still standing, stood behind stout entrenchments around Atlanta. The next month would decide the fate of the campaign, and although General Hazen and his brigade had seen plenty of hard fighting since the Atlanta campaign began in May, more fighting was still to come. Hazen felt confident at the end result, looking at it as a matter of attrition and leadership. The change in Confederate commanders to Hood was welcomed by Hazen, who judged that Hood had half the military ability of the departed Joseph E. Johnson. “We are losing some good officers and men but I wish all could understand how vitally this campaign is striking the rebellion,” Hazen wrote. “Did you read Governor [Joseph] Brown’s proclamation calling out the militia and detailed men? There was no blossoming palmetto about that, but a plain and open groan, showing clearly how deep the travels of our army are moving down upon the tender places of the Confederacy.  

Just a few weeks after writing this letter, Hazen left the Army of the Cumberland for a promotion to division commander in the 15th Army Corps of the Army of the Tennessee where he remained for the rest of the war.

 

Near Atlanta, Georgia

August 2, 1864

          You are, without doubt, at home as I would like to be for a short time. The campaign is running into its fourth month with scarcely a day but a large part of the command is under fire. My losses in killed and wounded are already over a thousand, but this is no fair proportion of the losses of our army as the fates have as usually put me in warm places.

          Will the people keep up their pluck and fight the thing out? It all depends on their steadfastness of purpose. If Richmond does not fall sooner, the army of the West will finally make its way to the back door. If none of the eastern Rebel army comes here, we will wear this one out before the close of the season and it is but a matter of time when the entire force of the enemy must waste away. Will the people hold out?

Johnston’s veteran army by his official report of June 25th contained 46,628 arms bearing men including 6,631 of Wheeler’s Cavalry [A report of June 30th shows a total of 62,747 men of all arms in the Army of Tennessee]. They have lost since that time 5,000 prisoners and in their three assaults upon our works since arriving in front of the place at least 20,000 men. [Official reports indicate losses of 2,500 at Peach Tree Creek, 5,500 at Atlanta, and 3,000 at Ezra Church, or roughly 11,000 men] They have received from Mississippi 3,500 men with Stephen D. Lee and are receiving from Governor [Joseph] Brown’s proclamation about 8,000 militia. This gives them today an army of about 25,000 veterans and 8,000 militia, 33,000 in all.


Union graves on the Peach Tree Creek battlefield north of Atlanta in 1864


These figures are substantially correct. The hope of being reinforced by Kirby Smith is at last given up and after exhausting the militia of Alabama and eastern Mississippi, which may amount to 10,000 more, if they have the power to force them out. I cannot for my life see how the enemy can make up the wastage of their army. I do not pretend to say what our losses have been since leaving Chattanooga, but probably from all causes not less than [blank]. But I know the Rebel army when it was joined by Polk just before the fight at Resaca was 71,000 strong. This included Polk and that beside the additions before mentioned it has received a brigade (Harting’s) of at least 3,000 from Mobile. This gives the enormous loss to them since the campaign began of 52,000 men. What possible chance is there for these 33,000 now before us? These figures may seem like exaggerations, but they are not; they are realities and when it is remembered that the Rebels have lost 12,000 prisoners, have had no less than 12 engagements where from one to three corps have been in battle combined with the ordinary desertions and losses from disease, the 52,000 is readily made up. What will hinder the daily attrition of the next three months from completing the overthrow of the fore before us?

You will say, perhaps, why not assault so contemptible a foe, and put him out of his misery at once? The art of war here is no longer a chance matter. Both armies convey a full supply of entrenching tools, and no forces on either side ever rest till they have before them a complete line of works strong enough to resist the heaviest field ordnance with obstructions in the front in the wat of abatis, palisades, and entrenchments that puts the matter of an assault quite out of the question. I think the battle of Chickamauga on the left taught both armies the value of these works. No assault by either side on this campaign has been successful. It would surprise you to see how quickly and willing these men construct their works. None appreciate their value more truly.

We are losing some good officers and men but I wish all could understand how vitally this campaign is striking the rebellion. Did you read Governor Brown’s proclamation calling out the militia and detailed men? There was no blossoming palmetto about that, but a plain and open groan, showing clearly how deep the travels of our army are moving down upon the tender places of the Confederacy.  

General John Bell Hood

You know, of course, that Johnston has been relieved by Hood, a man of just half his ability. Gossip has it that his government was dissatisfied with his continued retreating and sought a man who believed their army could check us. Hardee is said to have been of Johnston’s opinion; that the endeavor to hold Atlanta would be the destruction of the army. Hood was then proferred the command and accepted the task. He has commenced well and had already assaulted us three times losing in all 20,000.
          I have never believed that the above was any true reason for the chance, but that Johnston was taken east to assist in planting a column in Pennsylvania. He knows that country thoroughly. It is the theater of his first operations in 1861. Besides, next to Bragg, he is the first general in their army in point of military ability.

The greatest victory for them, greater than 50 Manassases, and the only one that can give them a particle of hope will be the defeat of the war party at the incoming campaign. If they can, by any possibility, keep their army in the field, no matter whether victorious or not, and a little before the election place a strong army upon the soil of a free state with a fair show of sharp diplomacy upon their part, carelessly met by us, then let the question go flat before the people: peace or war? Who can tell what will be the result of our last three years of blood and victory? I fear nothing in Ohio. Our first great battle must be at the ballot box and the war power must be sustained at all hazards.

 

W.B. Hazen

Comments

  1. Dave PowellJuly 27, 2022 at 6:26 AM

    I have long noted the Chickamauga comment. Hazen's experiences on Sept 19 and 20 underlined the need for works: on the 19th his brigade lost 400 men in open field fighting; on the 20th, something like 15-20, while defending behind a rough barricade. He was sold from that moment on.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Most Popular Posts

Arming the Buckeyes: Longarms of the Ohio Infantry Regiments

Image
     A common question that comes up in conversation about Civil War Buckeye regiments is "What were they armed with?" We are fortunate in that the state of Ohio kept good records of how the regiments were armed when they went into service, this being especially true for those regiments which went into service in 1861 and 1862. The state adjutant general's reports for 1861 and 1862 have been heavily drawn upon to construct this article, as well as consultation with Phil Spaugy who has done extensive research on how Ohio's troops were armed during the war.      Buckeyes carried a fairly wide variety of weapons into the field, and the below article breaks this down into weapons of both domestic manufacture and imported arms. The early days of the war found the state of Ohio practically bereft of longarms; as an example, when the 1st and 2nd Ohio Volunteer Militia left the state in late April 1861, they left unarmed, being armed at Lancaster, Pennsylvania on their way to
Read more

Dressing the Rebels: How to Dye Butternut Jeans Cloth

Image
     In the early days of the Civil War,  the Southern states found themselves with an abundance of cotton but a shortage of cloth with which to make army uniforms. The trade in cloth prior to the war had largely been to send raw cotton or wool north to New England (or Great Britain) where it was converted into usable cloth; but now that trade was broken and the Southern states were thrown upon their own resources in their efforts to properly clothe the Confederate army.  This collection of Confederate enlisted men's frock coats and shell jackets gives some indication of the variety of shades of butternut worn during the war. All of them are shades of yellow brown, some heavier on the yellow and some heavier on the brown. The blue used around the collar or as rank insignia indicates that the soldier was in the infantry. Surviving Confederate uniforms are considered rather rare and command quite a healthy price in the collecting market. For an in-depth study of how Confederate jacke
Read more

Bullets for the Union: Manufacturing Small Arms Ammunition During the Civil War

Image
       Civil War bullets are perhaps the most common item collected from the era; the two armies expended bullets by the millions during the four years’ conflict and spent or deformed bullets of all shapes and sizes have made fascinating and affordable collectibles since the guns went silent in 1865.       I recently acquired a display piece featuring 35 different types of small arms ammunition used during the Civil War, including everything from a small .28 caliber ball up to a .69 caliber three-ring Minie and it triggered some questions: how did the Federal army obtain its small arms ammunition during the war? Where did the lead come from to make the bullets, and where and how was the ammunition manufactured? This post seeks to answer those questions. A typical .58 caliber 3-ring Minie bullet   “Whenever the blasts of war blow in the ears of men who trade in the implements of destruction, they are apt to experience more joy than the true warrior, for then comes the harvest of gain.
Read more

The Cannons are Now Silent: The Field of Death of Tupelo

Image
       The smoke of battle had drifted away from the battlefield at Tupelo, Mississippi on the hot afternoon of July 14, 1864, but the carnage of war lay spread across the open fields. “Scattered at intervals over the field of a few yards are dull gray blotches half shaded by grass,” an officer from the 7 th Minnesota Infantry recorded. “These are the Rebel dead. They have fought their last battle and lie generally in attitudes of rest; some of them look as if they had welcomed death. On the faces of two is imprinted a smile. One is a boy of 16 with delicate features, almost girlish in their beauty. His last gaze seems to have been directed toward his hand on the forefinger of which was a ring. A circle of purer white indicates its place; the ring was carried off as a trophy of the field.” The following account of the Battles of Tupelo and Old Town Creek was written by an unknown officer of the 7 th Minnesota Infantry, his account appearing in the August 5 th 1864 edition of the
Read more

The Vaunted Enfield Rifle Musket

Image
     The English-made Model 1853 .577 caliber Enfield Rifle Musket was widely regarded as the best infantry arm in the world at the outbreak of the Civil War in April 1861. Favorable international press describing its efficiency in the Crimean War and in suppressing the Indian rebellion led to the widespread desire of American infantrymen (both Federal and Confederate) to be armed with these accurate and well-made arms. The lock plate of this well-worn P1853 Enfield rifle musket produced in 1862 shows the typical markings of a British-made weapon that made it through the Federal blockade.  ( Army of Tennessee Relics ) Enfield-pattern weapons were imported into the states by the tens and hundreds of thousands during the war years; one estimate stated that the Federal government purchased 500,000 while the Confederates purchased another 400,000. The Confederate government dispatched Captain Caleb Huse to Europe in April 1861 to purchase weapons and Huse focused on securing all the Enfi
Read more

Straw Already Threshed: Sherman on Shiloh

Image
  W illiam Tecumseh Sherman was enjoying retired life in New York City when just before Christmas in 1889 he was presented with an article written by John Cockerill, a former drummer boy in the 24 th Ohio who was visiting his father Colonel Joseph Cockerill of the 70 th Ohio of Sherman’s division when the Battle of Shiloh began. Cockerill’s article, originally published in the New York Journalist and later featured in the January 1893 issue of Blue & Gray Magazine, Sherman later pronounced as “the best war story ever written” and the truest account of Shiloh.           On New Year’s Day 1890, General Sherman composed the following letter to his friend Marshall P. Wilder thanking him for sending along Cockerill’s article and giving his own explanation of Shiloh. “This to me is straw already threshed for we have fought this battle on paper several times, a much more agreeable task than to fight with bullets,” he concluded. “When in England some years ago I was gratified to liste
Read more

Federal Arms in the Stones River Campaign

Image
  T he following list, constructed after many years of research, lists unit by unit which type of weapons were carried by the Army of the Cumberland during the Stones River campaign. A number of sources were consulted including state ordnance reports, Federal quarterly ordnance reports (thank you Research Arsenal ), Ken Baumann’s Arming the Suckers, regimental histories and memoirs, captured ordnance reports, and consultation with knowledgeable experts in the field of firearms. Some of this information has been shared on the blog before in “ Rosy’s Heavy Metal: Artillery of the Army of the Cumberland ” or “ Shoulder Arms: How Sheridan’s and Davis’s Divisions Were Armed at Stones River ” but this is the first time the army as a whole has been presented. The overall conclusion I drew from looking at this data is that the Army of the Cumberland in December 1862 was an organization in the midst of transformation as far as arms. Many of the regiments still retained their original issue
Read more

Federal Arms in the Chickamauga Campaign

Image
T he ordnance returns of the Army of the Cumberland at the end of September 1863 show the results of a transformational year in weaponry. Since taking command of the army at the end of October 1862, General William S. Rosecrans had repeatedly pestered the War Department to supply his regiments with better firearms both to improve the command’s efficiency as well as expand its striking power. The results speak for themselves: for the infantrymen at the end of September 1863, 90% of them now carried Class I long arms (36,058 out of 39,959), 8.3% carried Class II arms, and a mere 1.5% carried Class III weapons. Most of the foreign-made weapons (except Enfields) were gone, and by and large the army had settled on a single common .58 caliber ammunition, although a few .54 caliber and .69 caliber weapons remained within the ranks. The English-made Enfield rifle musket was by far the most common arm, carried by 56% of the men while the second-most common arm was the .58 caliber M1861 Spring
Read more

In front of Atlanta with the 68th Ohio

Image
  The arrow corps badge of the 17th Army Corps was worn by many members of the 68th Ohio in the latter days of the war.       Private Edward A. Bigelow of Co. F of the 68th Ohio Volunteer Infantry wrote this brief account of the Battle of Atlanta just two days afterwards to his father back home in Henry County, Ohio. The regiment formed a part of Colonel Robert K. Scott's three regiment all-Ohio brigade consisting of the 20th, 68th, and 78th regiments, being designated the Second Brigade of the Third Division of Frank Blair's 17th Army Corps. Bigelow's letter originally appeared in the Napoleon Press newspaper and was copied in the Toledo Daily Commercial which was providential as no known copies exist today of the wartime Napoleon Press.  
Read more