Sunbrowned and War-Worn Stalwarts: A Character Study of Western Federals

 "They are tall, stalwart fellows, looking rather thin, sunbrowned, and war-worn. But there was something in the firm step, intelligent look, and resolute bearing of those tall, sinewy, iron-framed warriors that showed the thinking mind, and unfailing energy of the true soldier.” ~ New York Daily Herald, May 25, 1865

During the Civil War, observers noticed a distinct difference between eastern theater and western theater Federal soldiers. As the war progressed, the differences between the two grew more nuanced but stood in stark relief during the Grand Review of the armies in May 1865. As the Cleveland Morning Leader stated “though somewhat behind their brother Army of the Potomac in dress which could not be well-supplied on account of their long, incessant marches, in marching, physique, and soldierly bearing they favorably compared with them. They are tall, stalwart fellows, looking rather thin, sunbrowned, and war-worn. But there was something in the firm step, intelligent look, and resolute bearing of those sinewy, iron-framed warriors that showed the thinking mind and unfailing energy of the true soldier.” 

          D. Reid Ross noted in his 2008 article on the Grand Review that “the spectators and reporters who stayed over the second day consistently noted that Sherman’s “wolves” were taller, they looked older and stronger, and their marching stride was several inches longer. Even General Meade’s officers conceded that Sherman’s men marched better, their faces were more intelligent, self-reliant, and determined. Overall, Sherman’s slouch hats overtopped the easterners in their physical appearance and soldierly bearing.”

          This begs the question: what made western Federals different from their eastern theater comrades?

Quintessential western Federals: Co. H of the 44th Indiana poses in camp at Chattanooga, Tennessee in the spring of 1864. The "Iron 44th" first saw action at Fort Donelson in February 1862 then went on to fight at Shiloh, Stones River, and Chickamauga. After Missionary Ridge, the regiment was assigned to provost duty in Chattanooga where they served out the remainder of their term of service. 

     The very term “western Federals” denotes soldiers who fought anywhere west of the primary eastern theater fighting in eastern Virginia. This broad swathe of territory stretching west from the Appalachian Mountains to the Rockies encapsulated thousands of square miles of territory, much of it only a generation removed from the frontier. For the purposes of this review, I’d like to keep the focus on the two primary Federal armies that fought the war between the Appalachians and the Mississippi River: the Army of the Cumberland and the Army of the Tennessee.

Private James Cunningham
8th Missouri

         That there were distinct differences should come as little surprise. As the war progressed, these characteristics tended to become more nuances than stark black-and-white differences.

     First let's look at leadership. The popular perception of the Army of the Potomac is that it was a spit-and-polish very Regulation Army outfit. That tone of pomp and circumstance was set early by General George McClellan who insisted on both a snappy appearance of his troops as well as strict adherence to the regulations in all respects. As the war progressed, the soldiers of McClellan’s army grew into veterans just like their western comrades which tended to erode some of the early spit-and-polish, but the differences remained throughout the war.

          In contrast to the Army of the Potomac was the Army of the Tennessee which was led for much of its existence by both Generals Ulysses S. Grant and William T. Sherman. Both Ohioans adopted a less formal style of both command and dress, and their subordinates followed their lead and adopted the same manner with the rank and file. In the Army of Ohio (which became the Army of the Cumberland in early 1863), General Don Carlos Buell struggled to get his freewheeling westerners to follow the regulations which led, in part, to Buell’s steadily worsening popularity with the men after Shiloh.  Buell's injunctions and punishments against foraging (while his men suffered on half rations or less) rubbed against the grain and ruined Buell's reputation with his men. His replacement William S. Rosecrans was no softie on discipline but possessed a finer touch with his western volunteers and proved a far more popular commander. 

This image of an unknown company of western Federals recently surfaced; the subtle tinting and determined look of the officers and men help make this a superb image. Note also the drummer boy standing near the left of the line while the company officers, denoted by the red officers' sashes, stand front and center. 


    Secondly, the very nature of the campaigns in the west added their own flavor to both the appearance and conduct of the western federals. From the beginning, the westerners were an army on the move, their campaigns marked by lengthy marches traveling vast distances far removed from bases of supply. The men grew hardier under the strain or broke down completely and eventually left the army. The long marches and time away from camp tended to impact not only discipline (generally looser in the west) but appearance as well. The western preference for slouch hats and other wide-brimmed hats stemmed from the fact that a forage cap or kepi provided little if any protection from the sun; the men simply needed better cover while on the march.

Private Horace H. Smith, 16th Wisconsin

The need for comfort on the march also led to western Federals preferring sack coats versus frock coats; the men tended to gravitate more towards utilitarian garments versus ones that provided a fine appearance. Westerners typically wore less hat brass than their eastern comrades, and the idea of wearing corps badges didn’t really catch on in the west until after the battles for Chattanooga when the westerners were introduced to corps badges by their new comrades in the 11th and 12th Corps from the Army of the Potomac. However, many western Federals posed to get their “likeness” taken wearing frock coats complete with regulation Hardee hats, much like their eastern comrades. Once again, leadership at the regimental, brigade, and divisional level generally set the tone as far as standards of dress.

The roving nature of their campaigns squared with the pre-war experiences of many of these western troops. Everyone in the western army was one or at most two generations removed from the frontier; many of the soldiers from places like Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin, Missouri, and Kansas were actively living a frontier lifestyle when they joined the army. That said, these men tended to adopt a more pioneering and adventurous spirit, were less settled in outlook, rather restless, tended to be freewheeling, independent in thought and action with a devil-may-care attitude. Educational opportunities lagged in the western U.S. at this time, so the men tended to be a bit less educated in the aggregate than their eastern comrades.  

This image shows Co. H of the 7th Iowa at Corinth, Mississippi in late 1862. The difference in headgear is significant- most of the men are wearing forage caps with just a few slouch hats. As the western campaigns grew to include much more marching, the men preferred slouch hats as they provided more shade from the sun than a kepi or forage cap. Few soldiers after 1861 considered using havelocks since they just made the soldier sweaty and uncomfortable. 

In general, the composition of the armies in the west tended to feature less trades and businessmen and more farmers than in the east. These farmers were used to not only hard work but also were used to being their own boss which made them more apt to question their superiors, and consequently less apt to conform to discipline. In many ways, western Federal attitudes and outlooks tended to coincide with their western Confederate opponents more so than their eastern Federal comrades.

Captain Benjamin Stone from the 73rd Ohio of the 11th Army Corps of the Army of the Potomac observed when he arrived in Tennessee in October 1863 that the Army of the Cumberland was “very brave. It fights well but is very loose, unsystematic, undisciplined, and confused. Its business departments are loosely managed and its whole method of working is slovenly. It takes something besides courage to make an army.” Stone’s observation touches on the freewheeling nature that became a hallmark of the western Federals; the men tended to fight on their own hook once the shooting started and the independent nature of the men made them a little more willing to take initiative lower down in the ranks. The nature of their wide-ranging campaigns tended to drive the men to forage more heavily upon the countryside and the men subsequently adopted a hard-war posture earlier than their eastern comrades.

Western Federals could present just as a sharp an appearance as their eastern comrades. On the right, Sergeant John Baldwin of the 74th Ohio posed for the above image in Nashville in late 1862 wearing full regulation uniform: a nine-button frock coat, Hardee hat complete with brass horn, company letter, and regimental number, and black ostrich plume. He also is carrying his non-commissioned officers' sword and has a revolver tucked into his waist belt. On the left, Private Henry Lincoln of the 47th New York poses dressed for the march including his regulation knapsack, striped trousers, and kepi. 


Rank and file western Federals often felt like second-class citizens compared to their comrades back east. The western troops usually had to utilize older weapons and had a lower priority on equipment than the Army of the Potomac. Despite this apparent handicap, the men felt that they were better fighters than their eastern comrades and pointed to their successful war record with a great deal of pride. Repeated victories over the Confederate armies in Tennessee, Mississippi, and Georgia  stood in stark contrast to the repeated defeats suffered by the Army of the Potomac. Over time, the westerners developed something of a chip on their shoulders as they forged their own identity as rough and tumble soldiers who never got the credit they deserved from both the press and the public. That focus on the eastern theater carried on well into the late 20th century and it is only in the past 30-40 years that this "eastern theater bias" as begun to shift.

Regardless, as time went on, the western Federals earned grudging respect from their Confederate opponents who clearly could tell the differences between western and eastern Federals. One Confederate from the 47th Georgia recalled telling an eastern comrade at Chickamauga that “you ain’t fighting Dutch and Downeasters like you’ve been used to in Virginny.”   Robert Anderson of the 2nd Kentucky likewise told one of Longstreet’s men “them fellers out thar you are goin’ up against ain’t none of the blue-bellied, white-livered Yanks and sassidge-eatin’ forin’ hirelins’ you have in Virginny that run at the snap of a cap. They’re western fellers and they’ll mighty quick give you a bellyful o’ fightin’.” I think most western Federals would have smiled at that last comment and taken it as a hard-earned compliment.  

Sources:

“The Grand Review,” Cleveland Morning Leader (Ohio), May 25, 1865, pg. 1

“The Review: Sherman’s Veterans on Parade,” New York Daily Herald (New York), May 25, 1865, pg. 1



Comments

Post a Comment

Most Popular Posts

Arming the Buckeyes: Longarms of the Ohio Infantry Regiments

Image
     A common question that comes up in conversation about Civil War Buckeye regiments is "What were they armed with?" We are fortunate in that the state of Ohio kept good records of how the regiments were armed when they went into service, this being especially true for those regiments which went into service in 1861 and 1862. The state adjutant general's reports for 1861 and 1862 have been heavily drawn upon to construct this article, as well as consultation with Phil Spaugy who has done extensive research on how Ohio's troops were armed during the war.      Buckeyes carried a fairly wide variety of weapons into the field, and the below article breaks this down into weapons of both domestic manufacture and imported arms. The early days of the war found the state of Ohio practically bereft of longarms; as an example, when the 1st and 2nd Ohio Volunteer Militia left the state in late April 1861, they left unarmed, being armed at Lancaster, Pennsylvania on t...
Read more

Bullets for the Union: Manufacturing Small Arms Ammunition During the Civil War

Image
       Civil War bullets are perhaps the most common item collected from the era; the two armies expended bullets by the millions during the four years’ conflict and spent or deformed bullets of all shapes and sizes have made fascinating and affordable collectibles since the guns went silent in 1865.       I recently acquired a display piece featuring 35 different types of small arms ammunition used during the Civil War, including everything from a small .28 caliber ball up to a .69 caliber three-ring Minie and it triggered some questions: how did the Federal army obtain its small arms ammunition during the war? Where did the lead come from to make the bullets, and where and how was the ammunition manufactured? This post seeks to answer those questions. A typical .58 caliber 3-ring Minie bullet   “Whenever the blasts of war blow in the ears of men who trade in the implements of destruction, they are apt to experience more joy than the true ...
Read more

Dressing the Rebels: How to Dye Butternut Jeans Cloth

Image
     In the early days of the Civil War,  the Southern states found themselves with an abundance of cotton but a shortage of cloth with which to make army uniforms. The trade in cloth prior to the war had largely been to send raw cotton or wool north to New England (or Great Britain) where it was converted into usable cloth; but now that trade was broken and the Southern states were thrown upon their own resources in their efforts to properly clothe the Confederate army.  This collection of Confederate enlisted men's frock coats and shell jackets gives some indication of the variety of shades of butternut worn during the war. All of them are shades of yellow brown, some heavier on the yellow and some heavier on the brown. The blue used around the collar or as rank insignia indicates that the soldier was in the infantry. Surviving Confederate uniforms are considered rather rare and command quite a healthy price in the collecting market. For an in-depth study of h...
Read more

The Wizard of Oz and the Civil War

Image
T he 1939 film The Wizard of Oz has delighted viewers for 85 years and ranks as a personal favorite, especially during the Halloween season. While watching it with the family the other night, I wondered if there were any connections between the film and the Civil War. Not surprisingly, the answer is yes and those connections touch both the blue and the gray.           Interestingly both “witches” in the film not only had Civil War ancestors but had connections with Civil War soldiers from Ohio. Margaret Hamilton, the “Wicked Witch of the West,” was born in Cleveland, Ohio on December 9, 1902, to attorney Walter Jones Hamilton and his wife Mary Jane Adams; Margaret’s grandfather was Judge Edwin Timothy Hamilton. Judge Hamilton had served as a private in Co. D of the 84 th Ohio Infantry during the summer of 1862. The 84 th Ohio, a three months’ regiment, served nearly the whole of its service attached to the Railroad District in western Ma...
Read more

The Vaunted Enfield Rifle Musket

Image
     The English-made Model 1853 .577 caliber Enfield Rifle Musket was widely regarded as the best infantry arm in the world at the outbreak of the Civil War in April 1861. Favorable international press describing its efficiency in the Crimean War and in suppressing the Indian rebellion led to the widespread desire of American infantrymen (both Federal and Confederate) to be armed with these accurate and well-made arms. The lock plate of this well-worn P1853 Enfield rifle musket produced in 1862 shows the typical markings of a British-made weapon that made it through the Federal blockade.  ( Army of Tennessee Relics ) Enfield-pattern weapons were imported into the states by the tens and hundreds of thousands during the war years; one estimate stated that the Federal government purchased 500,000 while the Confederates purchased another 400,000. The Confederate government dispatched Captain Caleb Huse to Europe in April 1861 to purchase weapons and Huse focused on se...
Read more

In front of Atlanta with the 68th Ohio

Image
  The arrow corps badge of the 17th Army Corps was worn by many members of the 68th Ohio in the latter days of the war.       Private Edward A. Bigelow of Co. F of the 68th Ohio Volunteer Infantry wrote this brief account of the Battle of Atlanta just two days afterwards to his father back home in Henry County, Ohio. The regiment formed a part of Colonel Robert K. Scott's three regiment all-Ohio brigade consisting of the 20th, 68th, and 78th regiments, being designated the Second Brigade of the Third Division of Frank Blair's 17th Army Corps. Bigelow's letter originally appeared in the Napoleon Press newspaper and was copied in the Toledo Daily Commercial which was providential as no known copies exist today of the wartime Napoleon Press.  
Read more

Charging Battery Robinett: An Alabama Soldier Recalls the Vicious Fighting at Corinth

Image
W riting 30 years after the Battle of Corinth, James A. McKinstry of the 42 nd Alabama recalled his experiences storming Battery Robinett with Colonel William P. Rogers of the 2 nd Texas and expressed guilt that it was perhaps his action that brought about the colonel’s demise. “On seeing a line of Federals approaching, and before giving the situation a thought, I immediately raised my gun and fired full into the breast of a Federal sergeant, who was in front of the column, and only a short distance from us.  'Twas then that Captain George Foster shouted, "Cease firing, men! cease firing!" and waved his handkerchief, then I realized the true situation. 'Twas too late! That fatal volley had been turned on our little band from the muzzles of 1,500 muskets. I was still standing just as I was when I fired my last shot, and within a few feet of Colonel Rogers, when a Minie ball went crashing through my left hip and turned me half round; another went tearing through my ...
Read more

Cook & Brother of New Orleans

Image
    The lockplate of a New Orleans-made Cook & Brother Enfield rifle produced in 1862 shows the fine craftsmanship that became the hallmark of the maker throughout the Civil War. Note the stars and bars flag at left, an emblem used on C&B's production throughout the war and the Cook & Brother, N.O. 1862 markings. Earlier production weapons at New Orleans had the flag located just above the maker's name while later weapons produced in Athens, Georgia would have a modified flag and Athens on the plate followed by the serial number.        In the spring of 1861, two English-born businessmen, Ferdinand and Francis Cook of New Orleans, perceived the need for the South to have its own domestic production of firearms and  set out to prove "that rifles could made here as well as in Yankee land or in Europe." The brothers  elected to produce copies of the British Model 1853 .577 caliber Enfield rifle as this was considered the benchmark longarm...
Read more

I Want to See a Battle: A Hoosier at Shiloh

Image
W riting in his diary, Private Manius Buchanan of the 29 th Indiana recalled the eagerness with which his regiment marched towards Savannah, Tennessee with the sounds of the battle of Shiloh ringing in their ears.           “The forced march was kept up until 2 p.m. when we were halted until 4 p.m,” he noted. “The rest was really needed, but the continual question is ‘Why are we stopped here?’ The sound of battle increased in volume and anxiety to be up and doing grows more intense. As I am weak from a late sickness, I am urged to fall to the rear; but no, in common with all, I want to see a battle and fear this will be my only chance.” The regiment would go into action the following afternoon, and of the four neighborhood boys who had enlisted together in Co. B, only Buchanan escaped unscathed. One afternoon's exposure to the horrors of battle was all it took to satisfy this Hoosier's desire to see the elephant. “I wanted to see a battl...
Read more

An Interview with Forrest in May 1864

Image
  “The noise of battle is the only music that ravishes the senses of Forrest.” I t was May 1864. Back east, the Army of Northern Virginia and the Army of the Potomac were locked in the deadly dance of the Overland Campaign while in Georgia, General William Tecumseh Sherman's army squared off against General Joseph E. Johnston and the Army of the Tennessee in the campaign for Atlanta.       Based in relatively quiet northern Mississippi, General Nathan Bedford Forrest bided his time waiting for a Federal advance from Memphis. Earlier in the month, General Samuel Sturgis led a brief campaign into Mississippi but Forrest was sure Sturgis would venture out again. In the meantime, he tried to keep his reorganized command intact despite persistent demands from his superiors that he return the absentees and deserters who inflated his ranks (nearly 1,000 in number) to their original commands.      Around this same time,  an old acquaintance from Me...
Read more