How Wilder's Brigade Got Their Lightning
After chasing General John H.
Morgan’s troopers over half of southern Kentucky, Colonel John T. Wilder thought there had to be a better way to fight the war.
The tipping
point came on January 1, 1863, at the small crossroads of Bear Wallow,
Kentucky. For the past several days, Wilder had been marching his brigade
consisting of the 98th Illinois, 17th Indiana, 72nd
Indiana, 75th Indiana, and 18th Indiana Battery after
Morgan’s marauding cavalrymen. Wilder heard gunfire in the distance and
resolved to mount some of his men on the brigade’s mules and try to pursue
Morgan that way. It proved a complete disaster as remembered by Corporal
Benjamin F. Magee of the 72nd Indiana.
“The mules
were brought out in great haste, each one shaking his tail as if he knew there
was extra duty demanded,” the Hoosier recalled. “Not more than one mule out of
sic ever had a man on its back and never wanted to have. The order to mount was
given and the bold men and officers each leaped upon his mule, each mule gave a
bray, brought his head between his fore feet as his heels flew high in the air,
and each man also flew high into the air and flopped down in the mud. The mules
wiggled their tails, shook their heads and became as demure as Quakers. The men
picked themselves up out of the mud and each went for his mule again and sprang
upon their backs. The mules turned a handspring as before, sending the men
tumbling into the air. Scarcely a man stuck except those that got on to the
saddle mules.”
Colonel Wilder
stood beside hardly able to contain his laughter and frustration at the farce,
but it gave him an inspiration. “We had been chasing Morgan’s force which was
mounted on the best blooded horses of the South in mule wagons and on foot,”
Magee continued. “The Colonel, seeing the futility of such chases, determined
we would try and have the brigade mounted so as to travel as rapidly as Morgan
could.” The idea was sound, but it was equally obvious that mounting the
brigade on mules was not the answer.
Wilder’s
struggle touched upon a recurrent problem faced by the Federal armies in the West.
The Confederate cavalry during the first two years of the war in the West
generally ran circles around their Federal opponents. Between John Morgan,
Nathan Bedford Forrest, and Joe Wheeler, Union communications and supplies were
under continual threat and the existing Federal cavalry force was both too
small and improperly employed to combat the threat. Confederate cavalry
operations proved a major factor in deciding the course of the war in the West;
by striking at Union positions along the Louisville & Nashville Railroad in
the summer of 1862, they were able to halt General Don Carlos Buell’s drive on
Chattanooga. With spectacular raids on places such as Murfreesboro in July and at Big South Tunnel in Gallatin during August, Forrest and
Morgan made household names of themselves and always seem one step ahead of
their Federal pursuers.
General
Rosecrans also had been struggling to correct to issues with the cavalry. His
first step was to persuade the War Department to send him General David S.
Stanley to take over as the army’s cavalry chief. Stanley’s first tackled the
problem of deployment; the army’s cavalry was scattered in small detachments
across Tennessee and Stanley directed it to be concentrated into brigades. The
infantry commanders resisted this, but eventually Stanley (with Rosecrans’
backing) got his way. Emphasis was placed on acquiring better arms and well as
polishing up on saber drill and the cavalry gave a better account of itself
during the Stones River campaign. But there was still a long way to go.
The biggest
problem was there just wasn’t enough cavalry to go around. Rosecrans
continually pestered Washington for cavalry reinforcements, but they proved
very slow in coming. Horses were also hard to come by. When Wilder approached
Rosecrans in January with the idea of mounting his brigade, he met a ready
audience. One thing Rosecrans had in abundance was infantry; if he could find a
way to utilize them to combat the Confederate cavalry, he was all ears. The
method that Wilder proposed to secure mounts for his brigade was simple:
impressment from the “disloyal inhabitants” of the region. Wilder sold
Rosecrans on the idea and on February 16th Rosey issued Special
Field Order No. 16 directing Wilder to follow through on his plan.
Wilder and his
infantrymen had enlisted to fight as infantry, and now that they were changing
their mode of arms, Wilder had the issue put to a vote within the brigade. All
of the regiments except the 75th Indiana voted to go with the
change; the 75th Indiana would depart the brigade in May, replaced
by the 123rd Illinois. The men were adamant: they did not intend to
become cavalry- they would move and fight as mounted infantry. In March, they
received new hats and uniforms: standard Federal cavalry jackets trimmed in
yellow and reinforced trousers. The men promptly tore off the yellow piping on
the jackets as is shown on the example shown below.
Throughout the
spring of 1863, Wilder led his men on a series of raids throughout middle
Tennessee securing horses for his brigade. The question now turned to armament.
In March 1863, the brigade received a supply of hatchets and for a hot minute
were known as the Hatchet Brigade, but this would hardly do as a weapon in
modern warfare. The men carried a mix of single shot muzzleloading weapons including
Austrian Lorenz rifles and Springfields. Solid arms to be sure, but
impractical to use while mounted. Wilder felt that to gain a tactical edge on
the Confederate cavalry, he needed a handier arm. A few weapons were considered
including the 16-shot Henry repeating rifle before Wilder eventually settling on
the seven-shot .56 caliber Spencer repeating rifle.
Christopher M.
Spencer, inventor of the Model 1860 Spencer rifle, brought a weapon directly to
Murfreesboro in March and put on a firing demonstration for Rosecrans and
Wilder. The lever-action gun featured a tubular magazine within the stock that
held seven metallic cartridges. To load the weapon, the soldier would move the hammer
to the half cock position, then actuate the loading lever which would move a
bullet from the magazine into the chamber and seat it into position. The
soldier then would manually move the hammer to the fully cocked position then
fire. It was an innovative weapon but more importantly the stout lever action gave
evidence of being able to withstand the rigors of field use. The rate of fire
poured out was simply incredible; a trained soldier could empty his entire
magazine in roughly 20 seconds and later accounts showed a rate of fire of
nearly 20 rounds a minute. Compared with the two to three shots a minute an
infantryman could fire from a muzzle loading rifle musket, this was lightning,
indeed.
Wilder was instantly sold. “I
believe them to be the best arm for army use that I have seen,” Wilder wrote
enthusiastically. “No line of men who within 50 yards of another force armed
with Spencers can either get away alive or reach them with a charge as in
either case they are certain to be destroyed by the terrible fire poured from
the ranks by cool men thus armed.” Wilder negotiated a $35 price per gun with
Spencer and landed upon an unorthodox way to pay for them: self-financing.
Turning to banker friends back in Indiana, Wilder persuaded them to put forward
the money so that each man would sign a promissory note agreeing to purchase
their own gun. Wilder even offered up his home and business as collateral to
facilitate the loan; the bankers agreed to execute the loan without the
collateral as long as Wilder co-signed which he readily agreed to do. Wilder
promptly cut an order for 1,400 Spencer rifles directly from the Spencer Repeating
Rifle Company in Massachusetts. Eventually, Wilder and Rosecrans worked out a
deal where the War Department paid for the rifles alleviating Wilder’s men from
the debt. [At the end of the war, the survivors of the Lighting Brigade had the opportunity to purchase their Spencers for just a few dollars apiece by having the amount deducted from their final settlement payment.]
By May, the new weapons started
to arrive in Tennessee and instantly proved a big hit with the men. “It never got
out of repair,” Corporal Magee noted. “It was put together entirely with screws
and anybody that had sense enough to be a soldier could take one all to pieces
and put it all together just as well as the man that made it. When held in the
hand at a ready, the weight was exactly balanced between two hands and it was
the easiest gun to handle in the manual of arms drill I have ever seen.” Interestingly,
the guns also came with a bayonet, one officer citing them as “highly useful
part of the repeating rifle.”
One issue early on was the
shortage of the expensive metallic cartridge ammunition. The biggest advantage
offered was that the cartridge was waterproof and sure to fire in any weather
conditions, a frequent problem with the paper-wrapped cartridges used by most
infantry arms at the time. But at $30 per box of 1,000 rounds, ammunition
needed to be carefully husbanded lest the brigade shoot itself right out of
business. Regimental commanders issued strict orders prohibiting unnecessary
firing “except when positively necessary.”
A .56 caliber Spencer rifle shown with the bayonet and frog. |
By early June, Wilder’s
foot-slogging infantrymen now found themselves mounted on the best Tennessee
horses they could find and armed with superb new repeating arms. Cavalrymen
dismissed Wilder’s experiment as “tadpole cavalry,” but morale was high and
within weeks the brigade would meet its first test at Hoover’s Gap in one of
the opening engagements of the Tullahoma campaign. Here they would earn the
nickname as Wilder’s Mounted Lightning Brigade, a sobriquet they would carry
for the rest of the war.
Sources:
Baumgartner, Richard A. Blue Lightning: Wilder’s Mounted Infantry Brigade in the Battle of Chickamauga. Huntingdon: Blue Acorn Press, 2007, pgs. 63-64
Magee, Benjamin F. History of the 72nd Indiana
Volunteer Infantry of the Mounted Lightning Brigade. Lafayette: S. Vater
& Co., 1882, pgs. 88-89
Comments
Post a Comment