Straw Already Threshed: Sherman on Shiloh
William Tecumseh Sherman was enjoying retired life in New York City when just before Christmas in 1889 he was presented with an article written by John Cockerill, a former drummer boy in the 24th Ohio who was visiting his father Colonel Joseph Cockerill of the 70th Ohio of Sherman’s division when the Battle of Shiloh began. Cockerill’s article, originally published in the New York Journalist and later featured in the January 1893 issue of Blue & Gray Magazine, Sherman later pronounced as “the best war story ever written” and the truest account of Shiloh.
On New Year’s
Day 1890, General Sherman composed the following letter to his friend Marshall
P. Wilder thanking him for sending along Cockerill’s article and giving his own
explanation of Shiloh. “This to me is straw already threshed for we have fought
this battle on paper several times, a much more agreeable task than to fight
with bullets,” he concluded. “When in England some years ago I was gratified to
listen to veterans fighting Waterloo and Sebastopol over again. So, I infer
that our children will continue the fight of Shiloh long after we are dead and
gone.”
General
Sherman’s letter was reprinted in the April 29, 1891, edition of the Western
Veteran.
73 West 71st Street, New York, New York
January 1, 1890
My dear friend,
I thank you
for sending me the printed paper containing the observations and experiences of
a friend about the battle of Shiloh or Pittsburg Landing. Having leisure this
New Year’s Day, I have read every word of it and from his standpoint as a boy
in the rear of where the hard fighting was done, his account is literally true.
His father (a noble gentleman) and I were fighting for time because our enemy
for the moment outnumbered us and we had good reason momentarily to expect Lew
Wallace’s division, only six miles off, and Buell’s whole army, only 20 miles
away. By contesting every foot of ground, the enemy was checked until night.
Our reinforcements came and, on the 7th, we swept on in front and pursued a
retreating enemy ten miles and afterwards followed up to Corinth, Memphis,
Vicksburg, etc. to the end.
That bloody
battle was fought April 6th and 7th 1862. After we had
actually driven our assailants back 26 miles to Corinth, we received the St.
Louis, Cincinnati, and Louisville papers from which we learned that we were “surprised,”
bayonetted in our beds with blankets to the ground and disgracefully routed.
These reports were heard back at the riverbank and from steamboats under high
pressure to get well away and such is history.
In the rear of
all battles there is a mass of fugitives. We had at the time 32,000 men, of
whom say 5,000-6,000 were at the steamboat landing but what of the others? A
braver, finer set of men never existed on earth. The reporters dwell on the
fugitives because they were of them, but who is to stand up for the brave men
at the front? We had no reporters with us. Like sensible men, they preferred a
steamboat bound for Paducah and Cincinnati whence they could describe the
battle better than we who were without pen or ink.
This to me is straw already threshed for we have fought this battle on paper several times, a much more agreeable task than to fight with bullets. When in England some years ago I was gratified to listen to veterans fighting Waterloo and Sebastopol over again. So, I infer that our children will continue the fight of Shiloh long after we are dead and gone. Wishing you a happy new Year, I am, sincerely yours,
W.T. Sherman
To learn more about the controversy at Shiloh, particularly Sherman’s letter writing campaign against Lieutenant Governor Benjamin Stanton of Ohio, please check out “Surprised at Shiloh? Hell no, said Sherman.”
“Not Surprised at Shiloh,” Western Veteran (Kansas),
April 29, 1891, pg. 7
Comments
Post a Comment