The Horrors of War on All Hands: The “Fighting Parson” of the 79th Illinois Recalls Franklin

Colonel Allen Buckner of Illinois was accorded the nickname of “The Fighting Parson” for his key role in driving home the successful attack of the Union army at Missionary Ridge. A former Methodist minister in Illinois, he led his 79th Illinois into action at Franklin a battle-scarred veteran. Buckner had fought at Pea Ridge with the 25th Illinois, and led the 79th Illinois through Stones River, Chickamauga, and Missionary Ridge. He had just returned to the regiment having been severely wounded months before at the Battle of Rocky Face Ridge at the outset of the Atlanta campaign. But Franklin proved “the most terrific battle I ever saw,” Colonel Buckner later wrote.

His regiment, assigned to Colonel Joseph Conrad’s brigade of General George Wagner’s Second Division of the 4th Army Corps, was in the outer line of Union works on the afternoon of November 30, 1864, a position Buckner stated that his regiment should never have been placed. “We had hard fighting before, but now the horrors of war were on all hands,” he wrote. “Our game was in our immediate front and charging all along the line. Our boys had passed beyond the realm of scare and excitement into the region of cool deliberation. We had several ranks on and behind the little fortifications working like majors, some loading and handing guns to the men who had the best positions, they firing and returning the guns to be reloaded.”

Colonel Buckner’s memoir of Franklin originally appeared in the March 19, 1890 edition of the Western Veteran published in Topeka, Kansas.

 

Colonel Allen Buckner took command of the 79th Illinois in the midst of the Battle of Stones River after its original colonel, Sheridan P. Read, was killed on the field. Buckner would lead his regiment through the end of the war, earning the sobriquet of "The Fighting Parson" for his heroism at Chickamauga and Missionary Ridge. He missed most of the Atlanta campaign after being shot through the body at Rocky Face Ridge, but returned in time to lead his regiment at Franklin and a brigade at Nashville. Returning home to Illinois after the war, Buckner devoted the remainder of his life to ministerial work, moving from Illinois to Kansas in 1871. He served as a the chaplain of the Kansas State Senate for 8 years and as trustee for Baker University. Colonel Buckner died in his sleep at the home of his son-in-law in Mt. Vernon, Iowa on November 9, 1900 at the age of 70. 

          The most terrific battle I ever saw or read was that of Franklin, Tennessee. Our army was falling back to Nashville. General Hood was in command of the Rebel forces and General Thomas of the Union army. Our troops consisted of the 4th and 23rd Army Corps of the Army of the Cumberland with a small cavalry force. The object of General Hood was to counteract Sherman’s march to the sea.

          On the evening before the battle, we had a skirmish at Spring Hill nine or ten miles below Franklin. Our people built fortifications and made a show of fight until midnight; the campfires of both armies were close together. At 1 a.m., we muffled our artillery wheels and slipped out, trains and troops reaching Franklin in the early morning. The trains were hurried across the Harpeth River over two small bridges. The Rebel army was close at hand.

          At about noon they were forming on a line of ridges or hills from one to two miles in our front. Our first line of breastworks was in the shape of a half circle reaching from the river below to the river above and just in front of town. As soon as the necessary dispositions were made, the larger part of the 4th and 23rd Army Corps were placed behind these slender works. Two brigades of the second division (4th Corps) were stopped 800 yards in front of the first line; one of these brigades was placed on the right and the other on the left of the Columbia Pike with orders to fix bayonets and stay as long as possible.

          Our brigade, the Third, built a line of works in a hurry but the brigade to our right did not build such works as we did. Our skirmishers and those of the enemy were now engaged while the whole Rebel army was moving steadily and with great precision down the slopes to the right and left as far as we could see. It was evident that nearly the entire army that Sherman had been pressing from Dalton to Atlanta in the spring and summer was now in our front. General Thomas being back at Nashville, General Schofield was in immediate command with headquarters on the north bank of the Harpeth. General David Stanley was in command of the 4th Corps and with us on the field.

At about 3 p.m. the enemy was sufficiently close to the outer line to be reached very easily. The day was still and clear; we opened with terrific effect and continued until the enemy was on us. Our smoke rose in such dense clouds that I did not observe their presence until they were on the 51st Illinois to my right. I ordered my regiment to retreat, supposing other regimental commanders did the same as we had no order from the brigade commander. A great many of our noble men were killed and captured at these works. Afterwards, we learned that we had dealt death and ruin in the enemy’s ranks but we should never have been left in the front of that great army to be run over thus.

This detailed view from the American Battlefield Trust's map of Franklin shows the initial position of the 79th Illinois near the center of Wagner's line in front of Franklin. Struck by Cleburne's division around 4 p.m., the 79th fell back north along the Columbia Pike through the center of the Federal position with the Rebels hard behind them. The fight for the second line of breastworks would last well into the night. 

Without blame to the noble men who were waiting to receive the shock, quite a number of our boys were killed by their comrades as we came in. The Rebels were jubilant, officers swinging their hats and swords while shouting, “Break that line and it means Nashville and the Ohio River!” An opening was forced near our center on the Columbia Pike and the enemy rushed in. It seemed to me for a few moments that we were to be overwhelmed, but in the nick of time, the brave Colonel Emerson Opdycke of the 125th Ohio came with one of the brigades of the second division (which had been held in reserve) to the rescue and the enemy was crowded back at the point of the bayonet and our lines re-established.

We had hard fighting before, but now the horrors of war were on all hands. Our game was in our immediate front and charging all along the line. Our boys had passed beyond the realm of scare and excitement into the region of cool deliberation where every move was steady and at the same time quick with a consciousness of what must have been the result had we been crushed.

We had several ranks on and behind the little fortifications working like majors, some loading and handing guns to the men who had the best positions, they firing and returning the guns to be reloaded. Our artillery was mowing fearful swathes in the enemy’s ranks; their charges were frequent but our boys met them with bayonets, turning them back in confusion. For 800 yards in front, the dead and dying were lying thick.

These charges were kept up until 10 p.m. when the enemy drew back. We had sent a great many prisoners and most of our wounded to the rear. We left a thin skirmish line at the works and the army marched back to Nashville that night and the next morning. Our loss was very heavy but that the Rebels was simply awful. The enemy followed us with a weak hand to Nashville where in a few weeks Pap Thomas literally annihilated that army. But they got their death blow at Franklin.

 To learn more about the Battle of Franklin, please check out the following posts:

Source:

“A Terrific Battle,” Colonel Allen Buckner, 79th Illinois Volunteer Infantry, Western Veteran (Kansas), March 19, 1890, pg. 1

Comments

Post a Comment

Most Popular Posts

Arming the Buckeyes: Longarms of the Ohio Infantry Regiments

Image
     A common question that comes up in conversation about Civil War Buckeye regiments is "What were they armed with?" We are fortunate in that the state of Ohio kept good records of how the regiments were armed when they went into service, this being especially true for those regiments which went into service in 1861 and 1862. The state adjutant general's reports for 1861 and 1862 have been heavily drawn upon to construct this article, as well as consultation with Phil Spaugy who has done extensive research on how Ohio's troops were armed during the war.      Buckeyes carried a fairly wide variety of weapons into the field, and the below article breaks this down into weapons of both domestic manufacture and imported arms. The early days of the war found the state of Ohio practically bereft of longarms; as an example, when the 1st and 2nd Ohio Volunteer Militia left the state in late April 1861, they left unarmed, being armed at Lancaster, Pennsylvania on t...
Read more

Bullets for the Union: Manufacturing Small Arms Ammunition During the Civil War

Image
       Civil War bullets are perhaps the most common item collected from the era; the two armies expended bullets by the millions during the four years’ conflict and spent or deformed bullets of all shapes and sizes have made fascinating and affordable collectibles since the guns went silent in 1865.       I recently acquired a display piece featuring 35 different types of small arms ammunition used during the Civil War, including everything from a small .28 caliber ball up to a .69 caliber three-ring Minie and it triggered some questions: how did the Federal army obtain its small arms ammunition during the war? Where did the lead come from to make the bullets, and where and how was the ammunition manufactured? This post seeks to answer those questions. A typical .58 caliber 3-ring Minie bullet   “Whenever the blasts of war blow in the ears of men who trade in the implements of destruction, they are apt to experience more joy than the true ...
Read more

Dressing the Rebels: How to Dye Butternut Jeans Cloth

Image
     In the early days of the Civil War,  the Southern states found themselves with an abundance of cotton but a shortage of cloth with which to make army uniforms. The trade in cloth prior to the war had largely been to send raw cotton or wool north to New England (or Great Britain) where it was converted into usable cloth; but now that trade was broken and the Southern states were thrown upon their own resources in their efforts to properly clothe the Confederate army.  This collection of Confederate enlisted men's frock coats and shell jackets gives some indication of the variety of shades of butternut worn during the war. All of them are shades of yellow brown, some heavier on the yellow and some heavier on the brown. The blue used around the collar or as rank insignia indicates that the soldier was in the infantry. Surviving Confederate uniforms are considered rather rare and command quite a healthy price in the collecting market. For an in-depth study of h...
Read more

The Wizard of Oz and the Civil War

Image
T he 1939 film The Wizard of Oz has delighted viewers for 85 years and ranks as a personal favorite, especially during the Halloween season. While watching it with the family the other night, I wondered if there were any connections between the film and the Civil War. Not surprisingly, the answer is yes and those connections touch both the blue and the gray.           Interestingly both “witches” in the film not only had Civil War ancestors but had connections with Civil War soldiers from Ohio. Margaret Hamilton, the “Wicked Witch of the West,” was born in Cleveland, Ohio on December 9, 1902, to attorney Walter Jones Hamilton and his wife Mary Jane Adams; Margaret’s grandfather was Judge Edwin Timothy Hamilton. Judge Hamilton had served as a private in Co. D of the 84 th Ohio Infantry during the summer of 1862. The 84 th Ohio, a three months’ regiment, served nearly the whole of its service attached to the Railroad District in western Ma...
Read more

The Vaunted Enfield Rifle Musket

Image
     The English-made Model 1853 .577 caliber Enfield Rifle Musket was widely regarded as the best infantry arm in the world at the outbreak of the Civil War in April 1861. Favorable international press describing its efficiency in the Crimean War and in suppressing the Indian rebellion led to the widespread desire of American infantrymen (both Federal and Confederate) to be armed with these accurate and well-made arms. The lock plate of this well-worn P1853 Enfield rifle musket produced in 1862 shows the typical markings of a British-made weapon that made it through the Federal blockade.  ( Army of Tennessee Relics ) Enfield-pattern weapons were imported into the states by the tens and hundreds of thousands during the war years; one estimate stated that the Federal government purchased 500,000 while the Confederates purchased another 400,000. The Confederate government dispatched Captain Caleb Huse to Europe in April 1861 to purchase weapons and Huse focused on se...
Read more

In front of Atlanta with the 68th Ohio

Image
  The arrow corps badge of the 17th Army Corps was worn by many members of the 68th Ohio in the latter days of the war.       Private Edward A. Bigelow of Co. F of the 68th Ohio Volunteer Infantry wrote this brief account of the Battle of Atlanta just two days afterwards to his father back home in Henry County, Ohio. The regiment formed a part of Colonel Robert K. Scott's three regiment all-Ohio brigade consisting of the 20th, 68th, and 78th regiments, being designated the Second Brigade of the Third Division of Frank Blair's 17th Army Corps. Bigelow's letter originally appeared in the Napoleon Press newspaper and was copied in the Toledo Daily Commercial which was providential as no known copies exist today of the wartime Napoleon Press.  
Read more

Charging Battery Robinett: An Alabama Soldier Recalls the Vicious Fighting at Corinth

Image
W riting 30 years after the Battle of Corinth, James A. McKinstry of the 42 nd Alabama recalled his experiences storming Battery Robinett with Colonel William P. Rogers of the 2 nd Texas and expressed guilt that it was perhaps his action that brought about the colonel’s demise. “On seeing a line of Federals approaching, and before giving the situation a thought, I immediately raised my gun and fired full into the breast of a Federal sergeant, who was in front of the column, and only a short distance from us.  'Twas then that Captain George Foster shouted, "Cease firing, men! cease firing!" and waved his handkerchief, then I realized the true situation. 'Twas too late! That fatal volley had been turned on our little band from the muzzles of 1,500 muskets. I was still standing just as I was when I fired my last shot, and within a few feet of Colonel Rogers, when a Minie ball went crashing through my left hip and turned me half round; another went tearing through my ...
Read more

Cook & Brother of New Orleans

Image
    The lockplate of a New Orleans-made Cook & Brother Enfield rifle produced in 1862 shows the fine craftsmanship that became the hallmark of the maker throughout the Civil War. Note the stars and bars flag at left, an emblem used on C&B's production throughout the war and the Cook & Brother, N.O. 1862 markings. Earlier production weapons at New Orleans had the flag located just above the maker's name while later weapons produced in Athens, Georgia would have a modified flag and Athens on the plate followed by the serial number.        In the spring of 1861, two English-born businessmen, Ferdinand and Francis Cook of New Orleans, perceived the need for the South to have its own domestic production of firearms and  set out to prove "that rifles could made here as well as in Yankee land or in Europe." The brothers  elected to produce copies of the British Model 1853 .577 caliber Enfield rifle as this was considered the benchmark longarm...
Read more

I Want to See a Battle: A Hoosier at Shiloh

Image
W riting in his diary, Private Manius Buchanan of the 29 th Indiana recalled the eagerness with which his regiment marched towards Savannah, Tennessee with the sounds of the battle of Shiloh ringing in their ears.           “The forced march was kept up until 2 p.m. when we were halted until 4 p.m,” he noted. “The rest was really needed, but the continual question is ‘Why are we stopped here?’ The sound of battle increased in volume and anxiety to be up and doing grows more intense. As I am weak from a late sickness, I am urged to fall to the rear; but no, in common with all, I want to see a battle and fear this will be my only chance.” The regiment would go into action the following afternoon, and of the four neighborhood boys who had enlisted together in Co. B, only Buchanan escaped unscathed. One afternoon's exposure to the horrors of battle was all it took to satisfy this Hoosier's desire to see the elephant. “I wanted to see a battl...
Read more

An Interview with Forrest in May 1864

Image
  “The noise of battle is the only music that ravishes the senses of Forrest.” I t was May 1864. Back east, the Army of Northern Virginia and the Army of the Potomac were locked in the deadly dance of the Overland Campaign while in Georgia, General William Tecumseh Sherman's army squared off against General Joseph E. Johnston and the Army of the Tennessee in the campaign for Atlanta.       Based in relatively quiet northern Mississippi, General Nathan Bedford Forrest bided his time waiting for a Federal advance from Memphis. Earlier in the month, General Samuel Sturgis led a brief campaign into Mississippi but Forrest was sure Sturgis would venture out again. In the meantime, he tried to keep his reorganized command intact despite persistent demands from his superiors that he return the absentees and deserters who inflated his ranks (nearly 1,000 in number) to their original commands.      Around this same time,  an old acquaintance from Me...
Read more