A Few Rounds of Canister: Bowling with Dilger at Chancellorsville

     In the early evening of hours of May 2, 1863, the six 12-lb bronze Napoleons of Captain Hubert Dilger’s Battery I of the 1st Ohio Volunteer Light Artillery sat well behind the front lines of the 11th Corps. The battery’s commander, a well-regarded German emigree known by his men as “Leatherbreeches” for his propensity to wear doeskin pants, was convinced that the army was about to be struck in the flank. To be sure, Dilger had made a personal reconnaissance earlier that afternoon in which he stumbled into a hornet’s nest of Rebels and tried in vain to convince his superiors of this fact, but Leatherbreeches’ command of English failed him and he galloped back into camp fit to be tied. Shortly thereafter, Jackson’s attack began and Dilger’s battery soon found itself amidst the maelstrom of the collapsing 11th Corps.

The subsequent conduct of Captain Hubert Dilger in fighting his battery during the retreat of the 11th Army Corps at Chancellorsville proved one of the few bright spots in the 11th Corps during that disastrous day, and eventually earned him a Medal of Honor in 1893. General Carl Schurz witnessed his heroism firsthand, stating in his official report that Dilger “limbered up only when the enemy’s infantry was already between his pieces. His horse was shot under him, as well as the two wheel horses and one lead horse of one his guns. After an ineffectual effort to drag this piece along with the dead horses still hanging in the harness, he had to abandon it to the enemy. The retreat now became general and the confusion increased as the troops marched through the woods. Captain Dilger had sent his battery towards Chancellorsville, keeping one piece with him which he brought several times into action with very good success during the retreat of the corps. The conduct of this officer was, on this as on all former occasions, exemplary.” One soldier put it more succinctly, stating that “our shot would go tearing down upon the road as if it were a bowling alley. I think we made some ten strikes.”

While most of Battery I was raised from Cincinnati, a contingent of men from Portage County, Ohio also served with the battery including Corporal Sidney S. Allen who served as the gunner on the lone gun Dilger personally commanded to sweep the Plank Road during the latter stages of the retreat. Accounts from three members of the battery are included below to give their experiences of the retreat that earned “Leatherbreeches” Dilger his Medal of Honor 30 years later.

 

Captain Hubert Dilger (1836-1911) of Battery I of the 1st Ohio Volunteer Light Artillery developed the reputation as one of the most daring and efficient artillerists in the army during the Civil War. His actions at Chancellorsville and Gettysburg earned him much renown, and during the Atlanta campaign he was given virtual free reign to deploy his battery where he felt it would do the most good. Dilger emigrated to the U.S. and moved to Cincinnati where he later joined Battery I and became the battery's commander in the fall of 1862. 

Private Charles A. Wright:

          As the 11th Corps has been the subject of much reproach for its recent flight at the Battle of Chancellorsville, I request the publication of the following statement of the facts connected with this unhappy event to the end that the citizens of Portage County having relatives in that corps, and particularly those having friends in Dilger’s Battery, may know the circumstances which those who had been uniformly successful under General Sigel had to contend with.

          Up to the 2nd of May, the fighting had been confined exclusively to the left and center- we occupying the right- on which day at 3 p.m. hostilities suddenly ceased. The report now spread through the army that the Rebels were in full retreat towards Richmond. Shortly afterwards, an order was received to draw three days’ rations and march next morning. Now bands struck up Yankee Doddle, Hail Columbia, etc., and were joyous at the prospect of pursuing them to the wall, but alas, the boot was on the other foot. For scarcely had the strains of music died away when a volley of bullets from Jackson’s corps greeted us. Imagine our dilemma- many of the troops had stacked their arms, some had begun cooking their three days’ rations and about a third of the officers, some of whom were very high in position, were absent from their commands.

          These are the undeniable facts concerning the flight of the 11th Corps. Let candid people attach the blame to whom it belongs.

          The first material check the Rebels received was when they came in contact with the canister we poured into their ranks as they emerged from the woods facing us. But the check was of short duration for onward they rushed, only maddened by our destructive fire for which they charged on us with great desperation. Failing to stop them, and our support having long before left, we limbered up as the only alternative to save the battery. We lost one gun, however, owing to the fact that the horses were all shot down and no time to draw it away by hand. Our loss in men was one man killed (Otis C. Gilbert) of Edinburg and eleven wounded.

 

Corporal Sidney Allen's gun fired canister and round shot down the Plank Road into the ranks of Jackson's troops during the desperate retreat of the 11th Corps on the evening of May 2nd. Corporal Allen likened it to shooting rounds down a bowling alley and stated "I think we made some ten strikes."

Corporal Sidney S. Allen:

          I was in the fight and it was a little the tightest place I was ever in, and but for the disgraceful panic of the corps (General Howard’s command), we could have repulsed the Rebels. The attack was unexpected and from an unlooked-for direction, but our men ought not to have run. Our battery took position and did nobly- not a man left his post. We stayed until our infantry was all gone and the Rebels were within ten rods of us. We sweetened them nicely with canister. I think more Rebels fell from the shots of my gun than they killed in our whole corps.

          Captain Dilger took my gun out into the road and I kept it clear, for as often as they would fill it up, it was cleared with a few rounds of canister. We retreated slowly down the road firing at nearly every step and had no infantry to support us. I was wounded after we retreated over a mile and half and came very near being captured. After the other corps came up and checked the Rebels, General Carl Schurz came up and inquired what gun came down the road. Captain Dilger told him and he came and shook hands with all the men. He said he never saw such determined bravery in all his life and did not know that men could work a gun under such a fire.

          There were three of us wounded on the gun and we are all satisfied to take the wounds we received for we know that we did more damage to the Rebels than they did to us. The road we withdrew upon was a fine plank road and our shot would go tearing down upon it as if it were a bowling alley. I think we made some ten strikes.

 

Monument of Battery I, 1st Ohio Light Artillery at Gettysburg

A few weeks later, an unknown member of the battery sent a letter home describing General Howard’s inspection of the battery in the aftermath of the battle and shared General Schurz’s address given to the battery on May 18, 1863.

 

“We were inspected yesterday afternoon by General Howard; all the other batteries in the corps were also inspected. In a very pleasant manner, he asked all the cannoneers numerous questions in regard to their pieces, their duty, about the caissons, ammunition, of what composed, ranges, and elevations, but did not trap any of the boys. Then we had to drill and unexpectedly came the command to dismount the pieces and carriages. There was a rattling of implements for a few seconds and down lay the men and battery flat on the ground. At the word of command, all were speedily mounted and we were firing at some imaginary enemy. It was a very pretty trick to do, if well done, but we never dismount those heavy pieces in action. All of the batteries did not come off so well as we did. General Howard told the two German batteries to return to camp and go to drilling and when they could drill like Dilger’s battery, he would see them again. General Howard appears like a fine man, seems to notice everything, and does not put on the amount of style that some generals do. I am inclined to like him, but somehow I have not got the confidence in him that I had in Sigel.”

“I enclose a short speech that General Schurz made us while we were in the Artillery Reserve of the corps. We were formed in line when he spoke to us a few words in substance nearly as enclosed.

 

General Schurz’s Speech to Dilger’s Battery on May 18, 1863

In the disasters that have lately befallen us, there is one organization that has maintained for itself a fair reputation and that is Dilger’s Battery. From information received from the enemy, the fire of your guns upon their advancing columns, pressing hard our shattered forces, was more destructive to them than all others combined. In all the engagements in which I have seen you, I can say that I never saw a man leave his post and go to the rear or the battery retire without orders. May the same spirit that had actuated you in the past prompt you to like conduct in the future. I am proud to say that you formerly belonged to my division and I am sorry you have been taken from it. I return thanks to you on behalf of my division and I might add that of the whole corps. In the coming campaign upon which we are about to enter, though you are not with me as before, I hope we shall be as close to each other as possible.

 

 

Sources:

Letter from Corporal Sidney S. Allen, Battery I, 1st Ohio Volunteer Light Artillery, Portage County Democrat (Ohio), May 20, 1863, pg. 3

Letter from Private Charles A. Wright, Battery I, 1st Ohio Volunteer Light Artillery, Portage County Democrat (Ohio), May 27, 1863, pg. 2

Letter from unknown member of Battery I, 1st Ohio Volunteer Light Artillery, Portage County Democrat (Ohio), June 10, 1863, pg. 2

Comments

Post a Comment

Most Popular Posts

Arming the Buckeyes: Longarms of the Ohio Infantry Regiments

Image
     A common question that comes up in conversation about Civil War Buckeye regiments is "What were they armed with?" We are fortunate in that the state of Ohio kept good records of how the regiments were armed when they went into service, this being especially true for those regiments which went into service in 1861 and 1862. The state adjutant general's reports for 1861 and 1862 have been heavily drawn upon to construct this article, as well as consultation with Phil Spaugy who has done extensive research on how Ohio's troops were armed during the war.      Buckeyes carried a fairly wide variety of weapons into the field, and the below article breaks this down into weapons of both domestic manufacture and imported arms. The early days of the war found the state of Ohio practically bereft of longarms; as an example, when the 1st and 2nd Ohio Volunteer Militia left the state in late April 1861, they left unarmed, being armed at Lancaster, Pennsylvania on t...
Read more

Bullets for the Union: Manufacturing Small Arms Ammunition During the Civil War

Image
       Civil War bullets are perhaps the most common item collected from the era; the two armies expended bullets by the millions during the four years’ conflict and spent or deformed bullets of all shapes and sizes have made fascinating and affordable collectibles since the guns went silent in 1865.       I recently acquired a display piece featuring 35 different types of small arms ammunition used during the Civil War, including everything from a small .28 caliber ball up to a .69 caliber three-ring Minie and it triggered some questions: how did the Federal army obtain its small arms ammunition during the war? Where did the lead come from to make the bullets, and where and how was the ammunition manufactured? This post seeks to answer those questions. A typical .58 caliber 3-ring Minie bullet   “Whenever the blasts of war blow in the ears of men who trade in the implements of destruction, they are apt to experience more joy than the true ...
Read more

Dressing the Rebels: How to Dye Butternut Jeans Cloth

Image
     In the early days of the Civil War,  the Southern states found themselves with an abundance of cotton but a shortage of cloth with which to make army uniforms. The trade in cloth prior to the war had largely been to send raw cotton or wool north to New England (or Great Britain) where it was converted into usable cloth; but now that trade was broken and the Southern states were thrown upon their own resources in their efforts to properly clothe the Confederate army.  This collection of Confederate enlisted men's frock coats and shell jackets gives some indication of the variety of shades of butternut worn during the war. All of them are shades of yellow brown, some heavier on the yellow and some heavier on the brown. The blue used around the collar or as rank insignia indicates that the soldier was in the infantry. Surviving Confederate uniforms are considered rather rare and command quite a healthy price in the collecting market. For an in-depth study of h...
Read more

The Wizard of Oz and the Civil War

Image
T he 1939 film The Wizard of Oz has delighted viewers for 85 years and ranks as a personal favorite, especially during the Halloween season. While watching it with the family the other night, I wondered if there were any connections between the film and the Civil War. Not surprisingly, the answer is yes and those connections touch both the blue and the gray.           Interestingly both “witches” in the film not only had Civil War ancestors but had connections with Civil War soldiers from Ohio. Margaret Hamilton, the “Wicked Witch of the West,” was born in Cleveland, Ohio on December 9, 1902, to attorney Walter Jones Hamilton and his wife Mary Jane Adams; Margaret’s grandfather was Judge Edwin Timothy Hamilton. Judge Hamilton had served as a private in Co. D of the 84 th Ohio Infantry during the summer of 1862. The 84 th Ohio, a three months’ regiment, served nearly the whole of its service attached to the Railroad District in western Ma...
Read more

The Vaunted Enfield Rifle Musket

Image
     The English-made Model 1853 .577 caliber Enfield Rifle Musket was widely regarded as the best infantry arm in the world at the outbreak of the Civil War in April 1861. Favorable international press describing its efficiency in the Crimean War and in suppressing the Indian rebellion led to the widespread desire of American infantrymen (both Federal and Confederate) to be armed with these accurate and well-made arms. The lock plate of this well-worn P1853 Enfield rifle musket produced in 1862 shows the typical markings of a British-made weapon that made it through the Federal blockade.  ( Army of Tennessee Relics ) Enfield-pattern weapons were imported into the states by the tens and hundreds of thousands during the war years; one estimate stated that the Federal government purchased 500,000 while the Confederates purchased another 400,000. The Confederate government dispatched Captain Caleb Huse to Europe in April 1861 to purchase weapons and Huse focused on se...
Read more

In front of Atlanta with the 68th Ohio

Image
  The arrow corps badge of the 17th Army Corps was worn by many members of the 68th Ohio in the latter days of the war.       Private Edward A. Bigelow of Co. F of the 68th Ohio Volunteer Infantry wrote this brief account of the Battle of Atlanta just two days afterwards to his father back home in Henry County, Ohio. The regiment formed a part of Colonel Robert K. Scott's three regiment all-Ohio brigade consisting of the 20th, 68th, and 78th regiments, being designated the Second Brigade of the Third Division of Frank Blair's 17th Army Corps. Bigelow's letter originally appeared in the Napoleon Press newspaper and was copied in the Toledo Daily Commercial which was providential as no known copies exist today of the wartime Napoleon Press.  
Read more

Charging Battery Robinett: An Alabama Soldier Recalls the Vicious Fighting at Corinth

Image
W riting 30 years after the Battle of Corinth, James A. McKinstry of the 42 nd Alabama recalled his experiences storming Battery Robinett with Colonel William P. Rogers of the 2 nd Texas and expressed guilt that it was perhaps his action that brought about the colonel’s demise. “On seeing a line of Federals approaching, and before giving the situation a thought, I immediately raised my gun and fired full into the breast of a Federal sergeant, who was in front of the column, and only a short distance from us.  'Twas then that Captain George Foster shouted, "Cease firing, men! cease firing!" and waved his handkerchief, then I realized the true situation. 'Twas too late! That fatal volley had been turned on our little band from the muzzles of 1,500 muskets. I was still standing just as I was when I fired my last shot, and within a few feet of Colonel Rogers, when a Minie ball went crashing through my left hip and turned me half round; another went tearing through my ...
Read more

Cook & Brother of New Orleans

Image
    The lockplate of a New Orleans-made Cook & Brother Enfield rifle produced in 1862 shows the fine craftsmanship that became the hallmark of the maker throughout the Civil War. Note the stars and bars flag at left, an emblem used on C&B's production throughout the war and the Cook & Brother, N.O. 1862 markings. Earlier production weapons at New Orleans had the flag located just above the maker's name while later weapons produced in Athens, Georgia would have a modified flag and Athens on the plate followed by the serial number.        In the spring of 1861, two English-born businessmen, Ferdinand and Francis Cook of New Orleans, perceived the need for the South to have its own domestic production of firearms and  set out to prove "that rifles could made here as well as in Yankee land or in Europe." The brothers  elected to produce copies of the British Model 1853 .577 caliber Enfield rifle as this was considered the benchmark longarm...
Read more

I Want to See a Battle: A Hoosier at Shiloh

Image
W riting in his diary, Private Manius Buchanan of the 29 th Indiana recalled the eagerness with which his regiment marched towards Savannah, Tennessee with the sounds of the battle of Shiloh ringing in their ears.           “The forced march was kept up until 2 p.m. when we were halted until 4 p.m,” he noted. “The rest was really needed, but the continual question is ‘Why are we stopped here?’ The sound of battle increased in volume and anxiety to be up and doing grows more intense. As I am weak from a late sickness, I am urged to fall to the rear; but no, in common with all, I want to see a battle and fear this will be my only chance.” The regiment would go into action the following afternoon, and of the four neighborhood boys who had enlisted together in Co. B, only Buchanan escaped unscathed. One afternoon's exposure to the horrors of battle was all it took to satisfy this Hoosier's desire to see the elephant. “I wanted to see a battl...
Read more

An Interview with Forrest in May 1864

Image
  “The noise of battle is the only music that ravishes the senses of Forrest.” I t was May 1864. Back east, the Army of Northern Virginia and the Army of the Potomac were locked in the deadly dance of the Overland Campaign while in Georgia, General William Tecumseh Sherman's army squared off against General Joseph E. Johnston and the Army of the Tennessee in the campaign for Atlanta.       Based in relatively quiet northern Mississippi, General Nathan Bedford Forrest bided his time waiting for a Federal advance from Memphis. Earlier in the month, General Samuel Sturgis led a brief campaign into Mississippi but Forrest was sure Sturgis would venture out again. In the meantime, he tried to keep his reorganized command intact despite persistent demands from his superiors that he return the absentees and deserters who inflated his ranks (nearly 1,000 in number) to their original commands.      Around this same time,  an old acquaintance from Me...
Read more