A Mississippi Gunner at Perryville

     Stanford’s Mississippi Battery galloped into action on one of the hottest spots of the Perryville battlefield on the afternoon of October 8, 1862. “Stanford’s battery was brought into action on the very ground a retiring battery had just occupied and formed under a terrible fire of shot and shell from a large battery of twelve-pounders, Napoleons, and James’ rifled pieces, the best artillery that is used,” wrote Corporal Benjamin W.L. Butt. “Soon the shrill report of our six-pounder rifled pieces responded to the heavier boom of the enemy’s guns. Each battery was in plain view of the other on the opposite hills one mile distant. Every flash from the distant guns was followed at intervals of five seconds by a report and the next instant a conical shell or solid shot would come screaming and plunging into our midst, tearing up the earth or riving the timber into fragments. Fortunately for us, most of their shots were aimed too high to strike us. In a short time after we formed, however, one of our horses was killed and soon a fatal shell struck down three of our brave boys.”

Stanford’s Mississippi battery was formed at Grenada, Mississippi in November 1861 as a six-gun battery originally armed with two 12-pound howitzers, three 6-pound smoothbores, and a single 3-inch rifle. Four of these guns were lost in action at Shiloh and the battery was re-equipped with fresh horses and four brass rifled pieces which the battery took on campaign into Kentucky.  Benjamin Watkins Leigh Butt was born in 1837 in Duck Hill, Mississippi and enlisted in Stanford’s Battery on March 17, 1862 at Corinth, Mississippi. A gifted writer, his frequent missives to the Memphis Daily Appeal were published under the penname of “Leigh” and provide a remarkable portrait of life in the western Confederate army. He survived the war but died in October 1876 in Brownsville, Mississippi.

Corporal Butt’s letter describing the Battle of Perryville was originally published in the November 4, 1862 edition of the Memphis Daily Appeal which at this time was being published in Grenada, Mississippi.

 

In their long range duel with Federal artillery batteries at Perryville, Stanford's four rifled brass pieces would have fired 12-lb solid shots or Mullane shells to knock out their opponents. 

Camp near Knoxville, Tennessee

October 26, 1862

          Since my last communication from Bardstown, important events have transpired, and the Army of the Mississippi has been compelled by the force of circumstances to fall back from Kentucky upon what we know to be Confederate soil. While in Kentucky, we fought one hard and bloody battle and as the victory has been claimed by both parties, it would not be uninteresting perhaps to your readers to have a faithful account of what I saw and heard for myself on the sanguinary field.

          Our army had fallen back from Bardstown to Harrodsburg by way of Danville followed by the enemy when it was ascertained by our scouts that a large body of Federals were in the vicinity of Perryville some ten miles distant. In accordance with this information, our generals determined to give them battle. Our division, commanded by General Frank Cheatham, with the exception of Preston Smith’s brigade, left Harrodsburg at 5 p.m. on the 7th instant and at about midnight we took a position on the outskirts of Perryville and slept on our arms, expecting the fight to open early in the morning. About daybreak, a scattering fire of pickets was heard some two miles distant which was soon discontinued. Presently a cannon and then another and still another boomed in the distance and we thought the action had opened in earnest, but not yet. Thus, an occasional cannonading was kept up for several hours, the object being on our part to ascertain the exact position of the enemy.

          About noon, we learned that the Federals were in heavy force on our right. Consequently, our whole line was put in motion and, indeed, the entire front changed. We marched about a mile northwest of town when the action commenced at one o’clock by cannonading at long range. The position of the enemy was well chosen. They were posted on a range of hills in the edge of a large old field about a mile in width, their left flank resting upon a skirt of woods. On the opposite side of the field upon a similar elevation, two or three of our batteries took position and opened the fight. Our guns were six-pounder smoothbores and howitzers, both ineffective at such a long range so that they could not cope on fair terms with the superior artillery of the enemy. Consequently, one of these batteries [Carnes’ Tennessee Battery], which was most exposed, was compelled to retire from the heavy fire of the enemy’s guns, some of the cannoneers and even the gunners having left their posts though afterwards they took a better position, and it is said fought well.

General Benjamin Franklin Cheatham at center surrounded by portraits of his staff.


          General Cheatham, seeing the condition of affairs, called for a battery which could stand when our brigade commander General Alexander P. Stewart remarked that he had one he thought would do for the emergency. So, Stanford’s battery which had been seeking a suitable position for half an hour was brought into action on the very ground the retiring battery had just occupied and formed under a terrible fire of shot and shell from a large battery of twelve-pounders, Napoleons, and James’ rifled pieces, the best artillery that is used.

          A new knight had now entered the lists, and soon the shrill report of our six-pounder rifled pieces responded to the heavier boom of the enemy’s guns. Each battery was in plain view of the other on the opposite hills one mile distant , the intervening space being as before mentioned an open field. Every flash from the distant guns was followed at intervals of five seconds by a report and the next instant a conical shell or solid shot would come screaming and plunging into our midst, tearing up the earth or riving the timber into fragments. Fortunately for us, most of their shots were aimed too high to strike us. In a short time after we formed, however, one of our horses was killed and soon a fatal shell struck down three of our brave boys, two to rise no more, and the third so dangerously hurt that his recovery is doubtful.

          Our battery, in connection with two others, now fought a regular artillery duel with a corresponding number of the enemy’s guns for an hour and a half, the loss on our side being small. We do not know for certain how much damage we did the enemy, but Major Bankhead, who conversed with the Federal chief of artillery after the capture of the battery (see the story of the capture of Major Charles S. Cotter here) says that we succeeded in exploding a caisson, killing a number of men and horses, besides doing considerable damage with other shots.

The implied ferocity of the Bowie knife is offset by the boyish face of this teenaged Confederate artillerist. 

After we had fired from 40-60 rounds per gun, we ceased firing for the guns to cool when it was determined to storm the enemy’s lines with infantry. This was about 3 o’clock in the afternoon. Our brigade, from which we had been separated, formed a part of the right wing under General Cheatham on which part of our line the heaviest fighting was done. The 30th Mississippi regiment under Colonel Neill lay immediately behind our battery while the 33rd Mississippi, belonging to Buckner’s division, followed it as a reserve when the charge was made. We were in an excellent position to observe the movements of our troops in the fight and watched them with the deepest interest as they were led on to the assault. There were several brigades in plain view marching across the old field to attack the enemy in his strong position.

 

“I soon found a favorable position on the border of the old field. From this point the infantry of the enemy were distinctly to be seen at a distance of a half mile behind a stone fence to near to some stacks of corn or fodder. At this juncture I had some fears about firing lest I should disturb the right of General Hardee’s command, but finding that these troops held in check by superior numbers of the opponents, I determined to risk the effects of the fire and threw one or two shots by way of a feeler which passed about 100 yards to the right of our friends and into the rank of the foe. The effect was such as was anticipated. Their flags immediately went out and waved in order that we might know them as friends. This signal was promptly answered by my flag which immediately restored confidence. It was then I gave the command to the battery to commenced firing. This was heartily responded to and with such terrible effect as to produce confusion in their ranks after the discharge of four rounds.” ~ Captain Thomas J. Stanford, Stanford’s Mississippi Battery

 

Oh, it was a noble, a glorious sight to see our gallant boys marching on undaunted apparently into the very jaws of death. When they had arrived to within 600 yards of the enemy’s lines, a terrible fire of cannister and musketry poured into their ranks, but they pressed on bravely without returning a shot until they were at close range when they opened fire with such terrible energy and execution that the enemy’s line was soon thrown into confusion. The Federals fought well but could not stand before the fierce charges of our gallant troops. Their artillerymen were shot down and the infantry driven back leaving several fine guns in our hands. But they fell back, slowly disputing every inch of ground as they were repeatedly reinforced.

The battle now raged with terrible fury. The very heavens were rent with the continuous crash of small arms interrupted only by the thundering boom of the artillery and the fearful explosion of shells. Our battery now took a new position much nearer the enemy and were so situated that our fire, together with the infantry on our left, subjected the enemy to a terrible crossfire. We directed our pieces toward a body of Federals behind a stone fence which had withstood the assault of our troops for more than an hour and threw among them several rounds of percussion shells with great precision and effect. (see story of 3rd Ohio click here) In less than five minutes, they broke in great confusion and disorder, our troops immediately taking possession of the ground they had just occupied and pursuing the now routed foe.

By 4:15 p.m., Stanford's Mississippi had deployed forward with Maney's and Stewart's brigades and was providing close support by blasting away at a stonewall behind which the Federals were holding the Confederate advance in check. (Map by Hal Jespersen)


This was the last fighting our battery did during the action. The fight was now carried on mainly by the infantry in the woods, the enemy constantly retiring before our troops. Once only did our forces fall back before a heavy reinforcement of the enemy estimated at 16,000 troops, but being themselves also reinforced, they soon regained the ground they had lost and drove the enemy a full two miles from the original scene of action.

Night now closed in upon us and put an end to the sanguinary conflict. We were in full possession of the field, having captured 16 guns, hundreds of stands of arms, and several hundred prisoners. We slept on the battlefield soundly and sweetly, while the peaceful moon looked calmly down upon the late scene of strife and the gentle Southern breeze lightly fanned the features of the slain.

We had in the fight parts of three divisions numbering in all 15,000 men; the enemy had at least 30,000, many of these being new recruits. Our loss in killed, wounded, and missing was about 2,200 men of which General Cheatham’s division lost 1,436. This division is composed entirely of Tennesseans with the exception of two Mississippi batteries and one Texas regiment, and be it said to their credit never did men fight better. The 30th Mississippi conducted itself nobly in the fight; indeed, the entire force we had engaged displayed the greatest determination and bravery. The enemy’s loss is estimated at between 5,000-6,000 which I think a moderate figure.

During the night, the enemy fell back to Springfield some ten miles distant and in the morning sent in a flag of truce asking permission to bury their dead. On the morning of the 9th, our forces with the exception of the cavalry fell back to Harrodsburg. Most of the artillery we captured was disabled and left behind as we had no munitions in the ordnance department available for such pieces. A large number of our wounded afterwards fell into the hands of the enemy as we did not have transportation sufficient for the removal of all. Our surgeons remained with them, however, and no doubt they will receive the best attention that circumstances will afford.

 

 Sources:

Letter from Corporal Benjamin Watkins Leigh Butt, Stanford’s Mississippi Battery, Memphis Daily Appeal (Tennessee), November 4, 1862, pg. 2

Report of Captain Thomas J. Stanford, Stanford’s Mississippi Battery, Memphis Daily Appeal (Tennessee), November 8, 1862, pg. 2

Comments

Post a Comment

Most Popular Posts

Arming the Buckeyes: Longarms of the Ohio Infantry Regiments

Image
     A common question that comes up in conversation about Civil War Buckeye regiments is "What were they armed with?" We are fortunate in that the state of Ohio kept good records of how the regiments were armed when they went into service, this being especially true for those regiments which went into service in 1861 and 1862. The state adjutant general's reports for 1861 and 1862 have been heavily drawn upon to construct this article, as well as consultation with Phil Spaugy who has done extensive research on how Ohio's troops were armed during the war.      Buckeyes carried a fairly wide variety of weapons into the field, and the below article breaks this down into weapons of both domestic manufacture and imported arms. The early days of the war found the state of Ohio practically bereft of longarms; as an example, when the 1st and 2nd Ohio Volunteer Militia left the state in late April 1861, they left unarmed, being armed at Lancaster, Pennsylvania on t...
Read more

Bullets for the Union: Manufacturing Small Arms Ammunition During the Civil War

Image
       Civil War bullets are perhaps the most common item collected from the era; the two armies expended bullets by the millions during the four years’ conflict and spent or deformed bullets of all shapes and sizes have made fascinating and affordable collectibles since the guns went silent in 1865.       I recently acquired a display piece featuring 35 different types of small arms ammunition used during the Civil War, including everything from a small .28 caliber ball up to a .69 caliber three-ring Minie and it triggered some questions: how did the Federal army obtain its small arms ammunition during the war? Where did the lead come from to make the bullets, and where and how was the ammunition manufactured? This post seeks to answer those questions. A typical .58 caliber 3-ring Minie bullet   “Whenever the blasts of war blow in the ears of men who trade in the implements of destruction, they are apt to experience more joy than the true ...
Read more

Dressing the Rebels: How to Dye Butternut Jeans Cloth

Image
     In the early days of the Civil War,  the Southern states found themselves with an abundance of cotton but a shortage of cloth with which to make army uniforms. The trade in cloth prior to the war had largely been to send raw cotton or wool north to New England (or Great Britain) where it was converted into usable cloth; but now that trade was broken and the Southern states were thrown upon their own resources in their efforts to properly clothe the Confederate army.  This collection of Confederate enlisted men's frock coats and shell jackets gives some indication of the variety of shades of butternut worn during the war. All of them are shades of yellow brown, some heavier on the yellow and some heavier on the brown. The blue used around the collar or as rank insignia indicates that the soldier was in the infantry. Surviving Confederate uniforms are considered rather rare and command quite a healthy price in the collecting market. For an in-depth study of h...
Read more

The Wizard of Oz and the Civil War

Image
T he 1939 film The Wizard of Oz has delighted viewers for 85 years and ranks as a personal favorite, especially during the Halloween season. While watching it with the family the other night, I wondered if there were any connections between the film and the Civil War. Not surprisingly, the answer is yes and those connections touch both the blue and the gray.           Interestingly both “witches” in the film not only had Civil War ancestors but had connections with Civil War soldiers from Ohio. Margaret Hamilton, the “Wicked Witch of the West,” was born in Cleveland, Ohio on December 9, 1902, to attorney Walter Jones Hamilton and his wife Mary Jane Adams; Margaret’s grandfather was Judge Edwin Timothy Hamilton. Judge Hamilton had served as a private in Co. D of the 84 th Ohio Infantry during the summer of 1862. The 84 th Ohio, a three months’ regiment, served nearly the whole of its service attached to the Railroad District in western Ma...
Read more

The Vaunted Enfield Rifle Musket

Image
     The English-made Model 1853 .577 caliber Enfield Rifle Musket was widely regarded as the best infantry arm in the world at the outbreak of the Civil War in April 1861. Favorable international press describing its efficiency in the Crimean War and in suppressing the Indian rebellion led to the widespread desire of American infantrymen (both Federal and Confederate) to be armed with these accurate and well-made arms. The lock plate of this well-worn P1853 Enfield rifle musket produced in 1862 shows the typical markings of a British-made weapon that made it through the Federal blockade.  ( Army of Tennessee Relics ) Enfield-pattern weapons were imported into the states by the tens and hundreds of thousands during the war years; one estimate stated that the Federal government purchased 500,000 while the Confederates purchased another 400,000. The Confederate government dispatched Captain Caleb Huse to Europe in April 1861 to purchase weapons and Huse focused on se...
Read more

In front of Atlanta with the 68th Ohio

Image
  The arrow corps badge of the 17th Army Corps was worn by many members of the 68th Ohio in the latter days of the war.       Private Edward A. Bigelow of Co. F of the 68th Ohio Volunteer Infantry wrote this brief account of the Battle of Atlanta just two days afterwards to his father back home in Henry County, Ohio. The regiment formed a part of Colonel Robert K. Scott's three regiment all-Ohio brigade consisting of the 20th, 68th, and 78th regiments, being designated the Second Brigade of the Third Division of Frank Blair's 17th Army Corps. Bigelow's letter originally appeared in the Napoleon Press newspaper and was copied in the Toledo Daily Commercial which was providential as no known copies exist today of the wartime Napoleon Press.  
Read more

Charging Battery Robinett: An Alabama Soldier Recalls the Vicious Fighting at Corinth

Image
W riting 30 years after the Battle of Corinth, James A. McKinstry of the 42 nd Alabama recalled his experiences storming Battery Robinett with Colonel William P. Rogers of the 2 nd Texas and expressed guilt that it was perhaps his action that brought about the colonel’s demise. “On seeing a line of Federals approaching, and before giving the situation a thought, I immediately raised my gun and fired full into the breast of a Federal sergeant, who was in front of the column, and only a short distance from us.  'Twas then that Captain George Foster shouted, "Cease firing, men! cease firing!" and waved his handkerchief, then I realized the true situation. 'Twas too late! That fatal volley had been turned on our little band from the muzzles of 1,500 muskets. I was still standing just as I was when I fired my last shot, and within a few feet of Colonel Rogers, when a Minie ball went crashing through my left hip and turned me half round; another went tearing through my ...
Read more

Cook & Brother of New Orleans

Image
    The lockplate of a New Orleans-made Cook & Brother Enfield rifle produced in 1862 shows the fine craftsmanship that became the hallmark of the maker throughout the Civil War. Note the stars and bars flag at left, an emblem used on C&B's production throughout the war and the Cook & Brother, N.O. 1862 markings. Earlier production weapons at New Orleans had the flag located just above the maker's name while later weapons produced in Athens, Georgia would have a modified flag and Athens on the plate followed by the serial number.        In the spring of 1861, two English-born businessmen, Ferdinand and Francis Cook of New Orleans, perceived the need for the South to have its own domestic production of firearms and  set out to prove "that rifles could made here as well as in Yankee land or in Europe." The brothers  elected to produce copies of the British Model 1853 .577 caliber Enfield rifle as this was considered the benchmark longarm...
Read more

I Want to See a Battle: A Hoosier at Shiloh

Image
W riting in his diary, Private Manius Buchanan of the 29 th Indiana recalled the eagerness with which his regiment marched towards Savannah, Tennessee with the sounds of the battle of Shiloh ringing in their ears.           “The forced march was kept up until 2 p.m. when we were halted until 4 p.m,” he noted. “The rest was really needed, but the continual question is ‘Why are we stopped here?’ The sound of battle increased in volume and anxiety to be up and doing grows more intense. As I am weak from a late sickness, I am urged to fall to the rear; but no, in common with all, I want to see a battle and fear this will be my only chance.” The regiment would go into action the following afternoon, and of the four neighborhood boys who had enlisted together in Co. B, only Buchanan escaped unscathed. One afternoon's exposure to the horrors of battle was all it took to satisfy this Hoosier's desire to see the elephant. “I wanted to see a battl...
Read more

An Interview with Forrest in May 1864

Image
  “The noise of battle is the only music that ravishes the senses of Forrest.” I t was May 1864. Back east, the Army of Northern Virginia and the Army of the Potomac were locked in the deadly dance of the Overland Campaign while in Georgia, General William Tecumseh Sherman's army squared off against General Joseph E. Johnston and the Army of the Tennessee in the campaign for Atlanta.       Based in relatively quiet northern Mississippi, General Nathan Bedford Forrest bided his time waiting for a Federal advance from Memphis. Earlier in the month, General Samuel Sturgis led a brief campaign into Mississippi but Forrest was sure Sturgis would venture out again. In the meantime, he tried to keep his reorganized command intact despite persistent demands from his superiors that he return the absentees and deserters who inflated his ranks (nearly 1,000 in number) to their original commands.      Around this same time,  an old acquaintance from Me...
Read more